Outcomes on home haemodialysis: registry challenges.

NDT Plus Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI:10.1093/ndtplus/sfr126
Mark S MacGregor
{"title":"Outcomes on home haemodialysis: registry challenges.","authors":"Mark S MacGregor","doi":"10.1093/ndtplus/sfr126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care policy is encouraging expansion of home haemodialysis, aiming to improve patient outcomes and reduce cost. However, most patient outcome data derive from retrospective observational studies, with all their inherent weaknesses. Conventional thrice weekly home haemodialysis delivers a 22-51% reduction in mortality, but why should that be? Frequent and/or nocturnal haemodialysis reduces mortality by 36-66%, with comparable outcomes to deceased donor kidney transplantation. Approaches which might improve the quality of future observational studies are discussed. Patient-relevant outcomes other than mortality are also discussed. </p>","PeriodicalId":18987,"journal":{"name":"NDT Plus","volume":"4 Suppl 3","pages":"iii32-iii35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ndtplus/sfr126","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NDT Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfr126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Health care policy is encouraging expansion of home haemodialysis, aiming to improve patient outcomes and reduce cost. However, most patient outcome data derive from retrospective observational studies, with all their inherent weaknesses. Conventional thrice weekly home haemodialysis delivers a 22-51% reduction in mortality, but why should that be? Frequent and/or nocturnal haemodialysis reduces mortality by 36-66%, with comparable outcomes to deceased donor kidney transplantation. Approaches which might improve the quality of future observational studies are discussed. Patient-relevant outcomes other than mortality are also discussed.

家庭血液透析的结果:登记挑战。
卫生保健政策鼓励扩大家庭血液透析,旨在改善患者的结果和降低成本。然而,大多数患者结果数据来自回顾性观察性研究,这些研究都有其固有的弱点。传统的每周三次家庭血液透析可使死亡率降低22-51%,但为什么会这样呢?频繁和/或夜间血液透析可降低36-66%的死亡率,其结果与死亡供体肾移植相当。讨论了可能提高未来观察性研究质量的方法。除死亡率外,还讨论了与患者相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信