Chapter 7 the relationship between coping and psychological adjustment in family caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
Malcolm I Anderson, Grahame K Simpson, Maysaa Daher, Lucinda Matheson
{"title":"Chapter 7 the relationship between coping and psychological adjustment in family caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.","authors":"Malcolm I Anderson, Grahame K Simpson, Maysaa Daher, Lucinda Matheson","doi":"10.1891/0739-6686.33.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the association between coping (as measured by the Ways of Coping Questionnaire [WOCQ]) and psychological adjustment in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A search conducted using the CINAHL, Medline, and PsycINFO databases yielded 201 citations between 1974 and 2014. A total of seven articles met the inclusion criteria; namely, the respondents who completed the WOCQ were family caregivers of individuals with TBI (including 66-item, 42-item, or 21-item versions). Reviews were conducted in accordance with the American Academy of Neurology guidelines (2011) for classifying evidence. The results found no Class 1 or Class II studies but only four Class III and three Class IV studies. The major finding across the better-rated Class III studies was that the use of emotion-focused coping and problem-focused coping was possibly associated with psychological adjustment in caregivers. The Class IV studies were determined to be inadequate or conflicting in determining the association between coping and psychological adjustment. Future studies need to employ carefully crafted designs, adhere to statistical procedure, apply advanced analytic techniques, and employ explicit models of coping, which will increase the accuracy and generalizability of the findings. </p>","PeriodicalId":35733,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of nursing research","volume":"33 ","pages":"219-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.33.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the association between coping (as measured by the Ways of Coping Questionnaire [WOCQ]) and psychological adjustment in caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A search conducted using the CINAHL, Medline, and PsycINFO databases yielded 201 citations between 1974 and 2014. A total of seven articles met the inclusion criteria; namely, the respondents who completed the WOCQ were family caregivers of individuals with TBI (including 66-item, 42-item, or 21-item versions). Reviews were conducted in accordance with the American Academy of Neurology guidelines (2011) for classifying evidence. The results found no Class 1 or Class II studies but only four Class III and three Class IV studies. The major finding across the better-rated Class III studies was that the use of emotion-focused coping and problem-focused coping was possibly associated with psychological adjustment in caregivers. The Class IV studies were determined to be inadequate or conflicting in determining the association between coping and psychological adjustment. Future studies need to employ carefully crafted designs, adhere to statistical procedure, apply advanced analytic techniques, and employ explicit models of coping, which will increase the accuracy and generalizability of the findings.
本研究旨在系统评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者照护者应对方式(WOCQ)与心理适应的关系。使用CINAHL, Medline和PsycINFO数据库进行的搜索在1974年至2014年期间产生了201次引用。共有7篇文章符合纳入标准;即,完成WOCQ的被调查者是TBI个体的家庭照顾者(包括66题、42题和21题版本)。根据美国神经病学学会(American Academy of Neurology) 2011年的证据分类指南进行评估。结果发现没有1类或II类研究,只有4个III类和3个IV类研究。评分较高的第三类研究的主要发现是,以情绪为中心的应对和以问题为中心的应对可能与照顾者的心理调整有关。第四类研究在确定应对和心理适应之间的关系方面被认为是不充分的或相互矛盾的。未来的研究需要采用精心设计的设计,坚持统计程序,应用先进的分析技术,并采用明确的应对模型,这将提高研究结果的准确性和普遍性。
期刊介绍:
This landmark annual review has provided nearly three decades of knowledge, insight, and research on topics critical to nurses everywhere. The purpose of this annual review is to critically examine the full gamut of literature on key topics in nursing practice, including nursing theory, care delivery, nursing education, and the professional aspects of nursing. Past volumes of ARNR have addressed critical issues such as: •Pediatric care •Complementary and alternative health •Chronic illness •Geriatrics •Alcohol abuse •Patient safety •Rural nursing •Tobacco use