Aristotle's Theory of Deviance and Contemporary Symbolic Interactionist Scholarship: Learning from the Past, Extending the Present, and Engaging the Future.

Robert Prus
{"title":"Aristotle's Theory of Deviance and Contemporary Symbolic Interactionist Scholarship: Learning from the Past, Extending the Present, and Engaging the Future.","authors":"Robert Prus","doi":"10.1007/s12108-014-9250-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although his work has been largely overlooked by symbolic interactionists and other students of deviance, Aristotle (c384-322BCE) addresses community life, activity, agency, and persuasive interchange in ways that not only are remarkably consistent with contemporary symbolic interactionist approaches to deviance, but that also conceptually inform present day theories of deviance and provide valuable transhistorical comparison points for subsequent analysis. Following (1) a brief overview of an interactionist approach to the study of deviance, attention is given to (2) classical Greek conceptions of good and evil (especially as these are articulated by Plato) before turning more directly to (3) Aristotle's notions of wrongdoing as this is reflected in his considerations of community, morality, agency, and culpability. While informed by Aristotle's considerations of causality (as addressed in <i>Physics</i> and <i>Metaphysics</i>), this statement builds most centrally on Aristotle's <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i> and <i>Rhetoric</i>. Striving for a broader understanding of deviance as a humanly engaged feature of community life, the paper briefly compares Aristotle's \"theory of deviance\" with Prus and Grills (2003) interactionist analysis of deviance. The paper (4) concludes with an assessment of the relative contributions of contemporary interactionist scholarship and Aristotle's materials for the study of deviance as a community-engaged process.</p>","PeriodicalId":515284,"journal":{"name":"The American Sociologist","volume":"46 1","pages":"122-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12108-014-9250-9","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Sociologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-014-9250-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Although his work has been largely overlooked by symbolic interactionists and other students of deviance, Aristotle (c384-322BCE) addresses community life, activity, agency, and persuasive interchange in ways that not only are remarkably consistent with contemporary symbolic interactionist approaches to deviance, but that also conceptually inform present day theories of deviance and provide valuable transhistorical comparison points for subsequent analysis. Following (1) a brief overview of an interactionist approach to the study of deviance, attention is given to (2) classical Greek conceptions of good and evil (especially as these are articulated by Plato) before turning more directly to (3) Aristotle's notions of wrongdoing as this is reflected in his considerations of community, morality, agency, and culpability. While informed by Aristotle's considerations of causality (as addressed in Physics and Metaphysics), this statement builds most centrally on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Rhetoric. Striving for a broader understanding of deviance as a humanly engaged feature of community life, the paper briefly compares Aristotle's "theory of deviance" with Prus and Grills (2003) interactionist analysis of deviance. The paper (4) concludes with an assessment of the relative contributions of contemporary interactionist scholarship and Aristotle's materials for the study of deviance as a community-engaged process.

亚里士多德的越轨理论与当代符号互动主义学术:从过去学习,延伸现在,并参与未来。
尽管他的工作在很大程度上被符号互动主义者和其他越轨研究的学生所忽视,但亚里士多德(公元前384- 322bce)论述社区生活、活动、代理和有说服力的交流的方式,不仅与当代符号互动主义者研究越轨的方法非常一致,而且还在概念上为当今的越轨理论提供了信息,并为后续分析提供了有价值的跨历史比较点。以下是(1)对越轨行为研究的互动主义方法的简要概述,重点是(2)古典希腊的善恶概念(特别是柏拉图对这些概念的阐述),然后再直接转向(3)亚里士多德对不法行为的概念,因为这反映在他对社区、道德、代理和罪责的考虑中。虽然亚里士多德对因果关系的考虑(如在《物理学与形而上学》中所述),但这种说法主要建立在亚里士多德的《尼各马可伦理学与修辞学》上。为了更广泛地理解偏差作为社区生活中人类参与的特征,本文简要地将亚里士多德的“偏差理论”与Prus和Grills(2003)对偏差的互动主义分析进行了比较。论文最后评估了当代互动主义学术和亚里士多德的材料对越轨行为作为一个社区参与过程的研究的相对贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书