Safety and Efficacy of Gadobutrol for Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Central Nervous System: Results from a Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Comparator Study.

Magnetic resonance insights Pub Date : 2015-04-07 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.4137/MRI.S19794
Juan E Gutierrez, Martin Rosenberg, Jörg Seemann, Josy Breuer, Daniel Haverstock, Jacob Agris, Thomas Balzer, Nicoletta Anzalone
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Gadobutrol for Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Central Nervous System: Results from a Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Comparator Study.","authors":"Juan E Gutierrez,&nbsp;Martin Rosenberg,&nbsp;Jörg Seemann,&nbsp;Josy Breuer,&nbsp;Daniel Haverstock,&nbsp;Jacob Agris,&nbsp;Thomas Balzer,&nbsp;Nicoletta Anzalone","doi":"10.4137/MRI.S19794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the central nervous system (CNS) with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is standard of care for CNS imaging and diagnosis because of the visualization of lesions that cause blood-brain barrier breakdown. Gadobutrol is a macrocyclic GBCA with high concentration and high relaxivity. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of gadobutrol 1.0 M vs unenhanced imaging and vs the approved macrocyclic agent gadoteridol 0.5 M at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, double-blind, crossover trial in patients who underwent unenhanced MRI followed by enhanced imaging with gadobutrol or gadoteridol. Three blinded readers assessed the magnetic resonance images. The primary efficacy variables included number of lesions detected, degree of lesion contrast-enhancement, lesion border delineation, and lesion internal morphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 402 treated patients, 390 patients received study drugs. Lesion contrast-enhancement, lesion border delineation, and lesion internal morphology were superior for combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced imaging vs unenhanced imaging (P < 0.0001 for all). Compared with gadoteridol, gadobutrol was non-inferior for all primary variables and superior for lesion contrast-enhancement, as well as sensitivity and accuracy for detection of malignant disease. The percentage of patients with at least one drug-related adverse event was similar for gadobutrol (10.0%) and gadoteridol (9.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gadobutrol is an effective and well-tolerated macrocyclic contrast agent for MRI of the CNS. Gadobutrol demonstrates greater contrast-enhancement and improved sensitivity and accuracy for detection of malignant disease than gadoteridol, likely because of its higher relaxivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74096,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance insights","volume":"8 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/MRI.S19794","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/MRI.S19794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Purpose: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the central nervous system (CNS) with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is standard of care for CNS imaging and diagnosis because of the visualization of lesions that cause blood-brain barrier breakdown. Gadobutrol is a macrocyclic GBCA with high concentration and high relaxivity. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of gadobutrol 1.0 M vs unenhanced imaging and vs the approved macrocyclic agent gadoteridol 0.5 M at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight.

Materials and methods: Prospective, multicenter, double-blind, crossover trial in patients who underwent unenhanced MRI followed by enhanced imaging with gadobutrol or gadoteridol. Three blinded readers assessed the magnetic resonance images. The primary efficacy variables included number of lesions detected, degree of lesion contrast-enhancement, lesion border delineation, and lesion internal morphology.

Results: Of the 402 treated patients, 390 patients received study drugs. Lesion contrast-enhancement, lesion border delineation, and lesion internal morphology were superior for combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced imaging vs unenhanced imaging (P < 0.0001 for all). Compared with gadoteridol, gadobutrol was non-inferior for all primary variables and superior for lesion contrast-enhancement, as well as sensitivity and accuracy for detection of malignant disease. The percentage of patients with at least one drug-related adverse event was similar for gadobutrol (10.0%) and gadoteridol (9.7%).

Conclusion: Gadobutrol is an effective and well-tolerated macrocyclic contrast agent for MRI of the CNS. Gadobutrol demonstrates greater contrast-enhancement and improved sensitivity and accuracy for detection of malignant disease than gadoteridol, likely because of its higher relaxivity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Gadobutrol用于中枢神经系统磁共振造影的安全性和有效性:来自一项多中心、双盲、随机比较研究的结果。
目的:使用钆基造影剂(gbca)对中枢神经系统(CNS)进行对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)是中枢神经系统成像和诊断的标准护理,因为可以看到导致血脑屏障破坏的病变。Gadobutrol是一种高浓度、高弛豫度的大环GBCA。本研究的目的是比较1.0 M gadobutrol与未增强成像和批准的大环药物gadoteridol 0.5 M剂量为0.1 mmol/kg体重时的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:前瞻性、多中心、双盲、交叉试验,患者接受未增强MRI,随后使用加多比超或加多特多进行增强成像。三位盲眼读者评估了磁共振图像。主要疗效变量包括发现的病变数量、病变增强程度、病变边界划定和病变内部形态。结果:402例患者中,390例患者接受了研究药物治疗。病变对比增强、病变边界描绘和病变内部形态优于非增强/加多布诺增强联合成像(P < 0.0001)。与gadoteridol相比,gadobutrol在所有主要变量上均不逊色于gadoteridol,在病变对比增强以及检测恶性疾病的敏感性和准确性方面均优于gadobutrol。至少有一种药物相关不良事件的患者比例对于加多比特罗(10.0%)和加多特罗(9.7%)是相似的。结论:Gadobutrol是一种有效且耐受性良好的CNS MRI大环造影剂。在检测恶性疾病方面,Gadobutrol比gadoteridol表现出更强的对比增强和更高的灵敏度和准确性,这可能是因为它的弛豫性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书