Comparison of Periochip (chlorhexidine gluconate 2.5 mg) and Arestin (Minocycline hydrochloride 1 mg) in the management of chronic periodontitis.

Navjot Jhinger, Daljit Kapoor, Rachna Jain
{"title":"Comparison of Periochip (chlorhexidine gluconate 2.5 mg) and Arestin (Minocycline hydrochloride 1 mg) in the management of chronic periodontitis.","authors":"Navjot Jhinger, Daljit Kapoor, Rachna Jain","doi":"10.4103/0975-962X.151697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate 2.5 mg (Periochip) and Minocycline hydrochloride 1 mg (Arestin) as local drug delivery agents in the management of chronic periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients in the age group of 30-50 years suffering from chronic periodontitis (12 males and 8 females), with almost identical probing depth bilaterally (5-8 mm), and exhibiting bleeding on probing were selected and divided into two groups: Group I consisted of periodontal pockets on the left side and received Periochip and group II consisted of periodontal pockets on the right side and received Arestin. Patients were recalled after 6 weeks and 3 months intervals from the baseline visit to record plaque index, gingival index, and probing depth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was reduction in all the parameters in both the groups at 6 weeks and 3 months as compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From the results of the present study, it was concluded that both the drugs were equally effective in reduction of plaque scores as well as gingival scores. It was further observed that Arestin resulted in better results at 6 weeks while Periochip showed better results at 3 months with respect to probing depth reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":90526,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of dentistry","volume":"6 1","pages":"20-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/dc/IJDENT-6-20.PMC4357074.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.151697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate 2.5 mg (Periochip) and Minocycline hydrochloride 1 mg (Arestin) as local drug delivery agents in the management of chronic periodontitis.

Materials and methods: Twenty patients in the age group of 30-50 years suffering from chronic periodontitis (12 males and 8 females), with almost identical probing depth bilaterally (5-8 mm), and exhibiting bleeding on probing were selected and divided into two groups: Group I consisted of periodontal pockets on the left side and received Periochip and group II consisted of periodontal pockets on the right side and received Arestin. Patients were recalled after 6 weeks and 3 months intervals from the baseline visit to record plaque index, gingival index, and probing depth.

Results: There was reduction in all the parameters in both the groups at 6 weeks and 3 months as compared to baseline.

Conclusion: From the results of the present study, it was concluded that both the drugs were equally effective in reduction of plaque scores as well as gingival scores. It was further observed that Arestin resulted in better results at 6 weeks while Periochip showed better results at 3 months with respect to probing depth reduction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

比较 Periochip(葡萄糖酸氯己定 2.5 毫克)和 Arestin(盐酸米诺环素 1 毫克)对慢性牙周炎的治疗效果。
研究背景该研究旨在比较葡萄糖酸洗必泰2.5毫克(Periochip)和盐酸米诺环素1毫克(Arestin)作为局部给药剂治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效:选取 20 名年龄在 30-50 岁之间的慢性牙周炎患者(12 名男性和 8 名女性),他们的双侧探诊深度几乎相同(5-8 毫米),探诊时有出血现象,并将他们分为两组:第一组为左侧牙周袋,使用 Periochip;第二组为右侧牙周袋,使用 Arestin。从基线访问开始,分别在 6 周和 3 个月后对患者进行回访,记录牙菌斑指数、牙龈指数和探诊深度:结果:与基线相比,两组患者在 6 周和 3 个月后的所有参数都有所下降:本研究结果表明,两种药物在降低牙菌斑评分和牙龈评分方面效果相同。进一步观察还发现,Arestin 在 6 周时的效果更好,而 Periochip 在 3 个月时的探诊深度减少效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信