A novel transurethral resection technique for superficial flat bladder tumor: grasp and bite technique.

Korean Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2015-03-01 Epub Date: 2015-02-26 DOI:10.4111/kju.2015.56.3.227
Kyung Jin Oh, Yoo-Duk Choi, Ho Suck Chung, Eu Chang Hwang, Seung Il Jung, Dong Deuk Kwon, Kwangsung Park, Taek Won Kang
{"title":"A novel transurethral resection technique for superficial flat bladder tumor: grasp and bite technique.","authors":"Kyung Jin Oh,&nbsp;Yoo-Duk Choi,&nbsp;Ho Suck Chung,&nbsp;Eu Chang Hwang,&nbsp;Seung Il Jung,&nbsp;Dong Deuk Kwon,&nbsp;Kwangsung Park,&nbsp;Taek Won Kang","doi":"10.4111/kju.2015.56.3.227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) can be a challenging procedure for an inexperienced surgeon. We suggest an easy technique for TURBT, which we have named the \"grasp and bite\" technique. We describe this technique and compare its effectiveness and safety with that of conventional TURBT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Monopolar TURBT (24-Fr Karl Storz) was performed in 35 patients who had superficial bladder tumors. After defining the tumor margin, the tumor and surrounding mucosa were grasped by use of a loop electrode and resectoscope sheath. With tight grasping, linear moving resection was performed. The patients' demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed between the conventional and grasp and bite TURBT groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 35 patients, 16 patients underwent conventional TURBT (group 1), and the other 19 patients underwent grasp and bite TURBT (group 2). Both groups were similar in age, tumor multiplicity, size, anesthesia method, and location. Grasp and bite TURBT could be performed as safely and effectively as conventional TURBT. There were no significant differences in irrigation duration, urethral catheterization, postoperative hemoglobin drop, or length of hospital stay. No significant side effects such as bladder perforation, severe obturator reflex, or persistent bleeding occurred. There were no significant pathological differences between specimens according to the type of resection technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The grasp and bite TURBT technique was feasible for superficial bladder tumors. It may be a good tool for inexperienced surgeons owing to its convenient and easy manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":17819,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Urology","volume":"56 3","pages":"227-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4111/kju.2015.56.3.227","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.3.227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) can be a challenging procedure for an inexperienced surgeon. We suggest an easy technique for TURBT, which we have named the "grasp and bite" technique. We describe this technique and compare its effectiveness and safety with that of conventional TURBT.

Materials and methods: Monopolar TURBT (24-Fr Karl Storz) was performed in 35 patients who had superficial bladder tumors. After defining the tumor margin, the tumor and surrounding mucosa were grasped by use of a loop electrode and resectoscope sheath. With tight grasping, linear moving resection was performed. The patients' demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed between the conventional and grasp and bite TURBT groups.

Results: Of 35 patients, 16 patients underwent conventional TURBT (group 1), and the other 19 patients underwent grasp and bite TURBT (group 2). Both groups were similar in age, tumor multiplicity, size, anesthesia method, and location. Grasp and bite TURBT could be performed as safely and effectively as conventional TURBT. There were no significant differences in irrigation duration, urethral catheterization, postoperative hemoglobin drop, or length of hospital stay. No significant side effects such as bladder perforation, severe obturator reflex, or persistent bleeding occurred. There were no significant pathological differences between specimens according to the type of resection technique.

Conclusions: The grasp and bite TURBT technique was feasible for superficial bladder tumors. It may be a good tool for inexperienced surgeons owing to its convenient and easy manner.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新的经尿道浅表扁平膀胱肿瘤切除术技术:抓咬技术。
目的:经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)对于缺乏经验的外科医生来说是一项具有挑战性的手术。我们建议采用一种简单的turt技术,我们将其命名为“抓咬”技术。介绍了该技术,并将其与传统TURBT技术的有效性和安全性进行了比较。材料与方法:对35例浅表性膀胱肿瘤患者行单极体TURBT (24-Fr Karl Storz)手术。在确定肿瘤边缘后,利用环形电极和切除镜鞘抓住肿瘤及周围粘膜。紧抓后进行线性移动切除。对常规组和抓咬组患者的人口学、术中、术后数据进行分析。结果:35例患者中,常规TURBT 16例(1组),抓咬TURBT 19例(2组)。两组患者年龄、肿瘤多样性、大小、麻醉方式、部位相似。抓咬TURBT可以像传统TURBT一样安全有效地进行。两组患者在冲洗时间、导尿时间、术后血红蛋白下降、住院时间等方面均无显著差异。无明显的副作用,如膀胱穿孔、严重的闭孔反射或持续出血。不同切除方式标本间病理差异无统计学意义。结论:抓咬TURBT技术治疗浅表性膀胱肿瘤是可行的。对于没有经验的外科医生,它可能是一个很好的工具,因为它的方便和简单的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信