Relationship between the usability and physicochemical properties of triamcinolone acetonide ointments

Yutaka Inoue, Rikimaru Maeda, Kayoko Furuya, Murata Isamu, Kimura Masayuki, Ikuo Kanamoto
{"title":"Relationship between the usability and physicochemical properties of triamcinolone acetonide ointments","authors":"Yutaka Inoue,&nbsp;Rikimaru Maeda,&nbsp;Kayoko Furuya,&nbsp;Murata Isamu,&nbsp;Kimura Masayuki,&nbsp;Ikuo Kanamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.rinphs.2013.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the physicochemical properties of TA ointments and conduct a human sensory test to assess the properties of those ointments. Physicochemical assessment was done via near-infrared (NIR) absorption spectroscopy, measurement of water content, microscopy, and measurement of viscoelasticity. The human sensory test examined 5 aspects (texture, cohesiveness, spreadability, smell, and feel). Three TA ointments were used: TA-A, a brand-name preparation, and TA-B and TA-C, two generics. The sensory test revealed significant differences between TA-A and TA-B and TA-C in terms of cohesiveness and spreadability. Significant differences between TA-A and TA-C and between TA-B and TA-C in terms of feel were noted. Microscopic examination revealed that TA-C had good dispersibility while TA-A and TA-B produced crystallization. NIR spectroscopy revealed differences in absorption spectra attributed to oil and water content in TAA, TA-B, and TA-C. Measurement of water content indicated water content of 0.06 ± 0.02% for TA-A, 0.08 ± 0.08% for TA-B, and 36.7 ± 1.19% for TA-C. Assessment of viscoelasticity indicated that stress decreased for all 3 ointments at 35 °C compared to that at 25 °C. TA-A and TA-B were found to have a higher percent decrease in stress than was TA-C. These findings indicate that differences in the types and content of additives caused differences in the physicochemical properties of individual ointments. In addition, differences in physicochemical properties presumably resulted in the close correlation between cohesiveness and spreadability in the sensory test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89718,"journal":{"name":"Results in pharma sciences","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 15-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rinphs.2013.10.002","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in pharma sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211286313000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the physicochemical properties of TA ointments and conduct a human sensory test to assess the properties of those ointments. Physicochemical assessment was done via near-infrared (NIR) absorption spectroscopy, measurement of water content, microscopy, and measurement of viscoelasticity. The human sensory test examined 5 aspects (texture, cohesiveness, spreadability, smell, and feel). Three TA ointments were used: TA-A, a brand-name preparation, and TA-B and TA-C, two generics. The sensory test revealed significant differences between TA-A and TA-B and TA-C in terms of cohesiveness and spreadability. Significant differences between TA-A and TA-C and between TA-B and TA-C in terms of feel were noted. Microscopic examination revealed that TA-C had good dispersibility while TA-A and TA-B produced crystallization. NIR spectroscopy revealed differences in absorption spectra attributed to oil and water content in TAA, TA-B, and TA-C. Measurement of water content indicated water content of 0.06 ± 0.02% for TA-A, 0.08 ± 0.08% for TA-B, and 36.7 ± 1.19% for TA-C. Assessment of viscoelasticity indicated that stress decreased for all 3 ointments at 35 °C compared to that at 25 °C. TA-A and TA-B were found to have a higher percent decrease in stress than was TA-C. These findings indicate that differences in the types and content of additives caused differences in the physicochemical properties of individual ointments. In addition, differences in physicochemical properties presumably resulted in the close correlation between cohesiveness and spreadability in the sensory test.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

曲安奈德软膏的可用性与理化性质的关系
本研究的目的是检查TA软膏的物理化学性质,并进行人体感官测试来评估这些软膏的性质。物理化学评估通过近红外(NIR)吸收光谱、含水量测量、显微镜和粘弹性测量来完成。人体感官测试检查了5个方面(质地、凝聚力、铺展性、气味和手感)。使用了三种TA软膏:TA- a,一种名牌制剂,TA- b和TA- c,两种仿制药。感官测试结果显示TA-A与TA-B和TA-C在黏结性和铺展性方面存在显著差异。TA-A和TA-C之间以及TA-B和TA-C之间在感觉方面存在显著差异。显微检查表明TA-C具有良好的分散性,TA-A和TA-B产生结晶。近红外光谱分析表明,TAA、TA-B和TA-C的油和水含量不同,其吸收光谱也不同。测定水分含量,TA-A含量为0.06±0.02%,TA-B含量为0.08±0.08%,TA-C含量为36.7±1.19%。粘弹性评估表明,与25°C相比,所有3种软膏在35°C时的应力都降低了。TA-A和TA-B被发现比TA-C有更高的压力降低百分比。这些结果表明,添加剂的种类和含量的不同导致了单个软膏的物理化学性质的差异。此外,物理化学性质的差异可能导致了感官测试中的内聚性和铺展性之间的密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信