Where are they now? Cash and Counseling successes and challenges over time.

Lori Simon-Rusinowitz, Abby J Schwartz, Dawn Loughlin, Mark Sciegaj, Kevin J Mahoney, Yaw Donkoh
{"title":"Where are they now? Cash and Counseling successes and challenges over time.","authors":"Lori Simon-Rusinowitz,&nbsp;Abby J Schwartz,&nbsp;Dawn Loughlin,&nbsp;Mark Sciegaj,&nbsp;Kevin J Mahoney,&nbsp;Yaw Donkoh","doi":"10.1891/1521-0987.15.3.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The positive results of the Cash & Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) led to the funding of a replication project that included 12 more states in 2008. Since then, the political and economic environments have changed. The authors sought to investigate how well the three original and 12 replication CCDE programs are coping with current challenges, and how their experiences may inform the growth and sustainability of emerging participant-directed programs. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with the 15 Cash & Counseling state program administrators. Key topics addressed included: successful aspects of state programs, biggest challenges for each program, and information program administrators would like to learn from state colleagues. Themes related to budget issues (e.g., staff shortages and program funding cuts) and non-budget related issues (e.g., understanding of program operations) emerged from the interviews. State program administrators also discussed program successes. To promote the sustainability and growth of participant-directed programs, existing participant-directed programs should be tied to national policy trends as well as review whether or not the programs address participant-directed principles. The development of new participant-directed programs should be based on other states' experiences as discussed in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":80262,"journal":{"name":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","volume":"15 3","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/1521-0987.15.3.104","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/1521-0987.15.3.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The positive results of the Cash & Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) led to the funding of a replication project that included 12 more states in 2008. Since then, the political and economic environments have changed. The authors sought to investigate how well the three original and 12 replication CCDE programs are coping with current challenges, and how their experiences may inform the growth and sustainability of emerging participant-directed programs. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with the 15 Cash & Counseling state program administrators. Key topics addressed included: successful aspects of state programs, biggest challenges for each program, and information program administrators would like to learn from state colleagues. Themes related to budget issues (e.g., staff shortages and program funding cuts) and non-budget related issues (e.g., understanding of program operations) emerged from the interviews. State program administrators also discussed program successes. To promote the sustainability and growth of participant-directed programs, existing participant-directed programs should be tied to national policy trends as well as review whether or not the programs address participant-directed principles. The development of new participant-directed programs should be based on other states' experiences as discussed in this paper.

他们现在在哪里?随着时间的推移,现金和咨询的成功和挑战。
现金与咨询示范与评估(CCDE)的积极成果为2008年在另外12个州开展的复制项目提供了资金。从那时起,政治和经济环境发生了变化。作者试图调查三个原始和12个复制CCDE项目如何应对当前的挑战,以及他们的经验如何为新兴的参与者导向项目的发展和可持续性提供信息。对15名现金与咨询州项目管理人员进行了半结构化的电话采访。讨论的主要主题包括:州计划的成功方面,每个计划面临的最大挑战,以及计划管理员希望从州同事那里学习的信息。与预算问题相关的主题(例如,人员短缺和项目资金削减)和与预算无关的问题(例如,对项目运作的理解)从访谈中浮现出来。州项目管理者也讨论了项目的成功。为了促进参与者主导项目的可持续性和增长,现有的参与者主导项目应与国家政策趋势联系起来,并审查这些项目是否符合参与者主导原则。正如本文所讨论的,新的参与者导向项目的发展应该基于其他州的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信