Big data challenges in bone research: genome-wide association studies and next-generation sequencing.

BoneKEy reports Pub Date : 2015-02-11 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1038/bonekey.2015.2
Nerea Alonso, Gavin Lucas, Pirro Hysi
{"title":"Big data challenges in bone research: genome-wide association studies and next-generation sequencing.","authors":"Nerea Alonso,&nbsp;Gavin Lucas,&nbsp;Pirro Hysi","doi":"10.1038/bonekey.2015.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been developed as a practical method to identify genetic loci associated with disease by scanning multiple markers across the genome. Significant advances in the genetics of complex diseases have been made owing to advances in genotyping technologies, the progress of projects such as HapMap and 1000G and the emergence of genetics as a collaborative discipline. Because of its great potential to be used in parallel by multiple collaborators, it is important to adhere to strict protocols assuring data quality and analyses. Quality control analyses must be applied to each sample and each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). The software package PLINK is capable of performing the whole range of necessary quality control tests. Genotype imputation has also been developed to substantially increase the power of GWAS methodology. Imputation permits the investigation of associations at genetic markers that are not directly genotyped. Results of individual GWAS reports can be combined through meta-analysis. Finally, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has gained popularity in recent years through its capacity to analyse a much greater number of markers across the genome. Although NGS platforms are capable of examining a higher number of SNPs compared with GWA studies, the results obtained by NGS require careful interpretation, as their biological correlation is incompletely understood. In this article, we will discuss the basic features of such protocols. </p>","PeriodicalId":72441,"journal":{"name":"BoneKEy reports","volume":" ","pages":"635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/bonekey.2015.2","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BoneKEy reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2015.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been developed as a practical method to identify genetic loci associated with disease by scanning multiple markers across the genome. Significant advances in the genetics of complex diseases have been made owing to advances in genotyping technologies, the progress of projects such as HapMap and 1000G and the emergence of genetics as a collaborative discipline. Because of its great potential to be used in parallel by multiple collaborators, it is important to adhere to strict protocols assuring data quality and analyses. Quality control analyses must be applied to each sample and each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). The software package PLINK is capable of performing the whole range of necessary quality control tests. Genotype imputation has also been developed to substantially increase the power of GWAS methodology. Imputation permits the investigation of associations at genetic markers that are not directly genotyped. Results of individual GWAS reports can be combined through meta-analysis. Finally, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has gained popularity in recent years through its capacity to analyse a much greater number of markers across the genome. Although NGS platforms are capable of examining a higher number of SNPs compared with GWA studies, the results obtained by NGS require careful interpretation, as their biological correlation is incompletely understood. In this article, we will discuss the basic features of such protocols.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骨研究中的大数据挑战:全基因组关联研究和下一代测序。
全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经发展成为一种通过扫描基因组中的多个标记来识别与疾病相关的遗传位点的实用方法。由于基因分型技术的进步、HapMap和1000G等项目的进展以及遗传学作为一门协作学科的出现,复杂疾病的遗传学取得了重大进展。由于它具有由多个协作者并行使用的巨大潜力,因此遵守确保数据质量和分析的严格协议非常重要。质量控制分析必须应用于每个样品和每个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)。软件包PLINK能够执行所有必要的质量控制测试。基因型插补也已发展,以大大增加GWAS方法的力量。代入允许对不直接基因分型的遗传标记的关联进行调查。个体GWAS报告的结果可以通过meta分析合并。最后,下一代测序(NGS)近年来因其分析基因组中更多标记的能力而受到欢迎。尽管与GWA研究相比,NGS平台能够检测更多的snp,但NGS获得的结果需要仔细解释,因为它们的生物学相关性尚不完全清楚。在本文中,我们将讨论这些协议的基本特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信