Pain management prior to nasogastric tube placement: atomized lidocaine.

Michele Farrington, Debra Bruene, Michele Wagner
{"title":"Pain management prior to nasogastric tube placement: atomized lidocaine.","authors":"Michele Farrington,&nbsp;Debra Bruene,&nbsp;Michele Wagner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is often painful for patients of all ages. Randomized clinical trials in adult patients support the use of some form of topical lidocaine in reducing pain associated with NGT insertion. A review of pediatric evidence also confirms that NGT insertion is painful and provides guidance in determining lidocaine concentrations, dosages, and administration methods. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based-Practice to Promote Quality Care provided the framework for development of a weight-based standard of practice (SOP) for administration of atomized lidocaine prior to NGT insertion for all patients. To facilitate usage, the orders for NGT placement and atomized lidocaine administration were linked in the electronic health record (EHR). Atomized lidocaine was administered via a patient-specific intranasal mucosal delivery device. Evaluation measures included pre- and post-implementation questionnaires which measured discomfort with NGT insertion in pediatric patients (0-10 scale; pre-implementation mean = 7.4; post-implementation mean = 6.5), monitoring utilization of atomized lidocaine via automated dispensing cabinet reports, soliciting comments from families and users, and monitoring institutional patient safety (incident) and adverse drug reaction reports. No patient safety or adverse drug reactions related to atomized lidocaine were identified post-implementation. Patients of all ages have benefited from administration of weight-based intranasal atomized lidocaine to decrease pain caused by NGT insertion. Ongoing safety evaluation and research is warranted since this is the first known report in the literature describing implementation of a weight-based dosing SOP.</p>","PeriodicalId":79417,"journal":{"name":"ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is often painful for patients of all ages. Randomized clinical trials in adult patients support the use of some form of topical lidocaine in reducing pain associated with NGT insertion. A review of pediatric evidence also confirms that NGT insertion is painful and provides guidance in determining lidocaine concentrations, dosages, and administration methods. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based-Practice to Promote Quality Care provided the framework for development of a weight-based standard of practice (SOP) for administration of atomized lidocaine prior to NGT insertion for all patients. To facilitate usage, the orders for NGT placement and atomized lidocaine administration were linked in the electronic health record (EHR). Atomized lidocaine was administered via a patient-specific intranasal mucosal delivery device. Evaluation measures included pre- and post-implementation questionnaires which measured discomfort with NGT insertion in pediatric patients (0-10 scale; pre-implementation mean = 7.4; post-implementation mean = 6.5), monitoring utilization of atomized lidocaine via automated dispensing cabinet reports, soliciting comments from families and users, and monitoring institutional patient safety (incident) and adverse drug reaction reports. No patient safety or adverse drug reactions related to atomized lidocaine were identified post-implementation. Patients of all ages have benefited from administration of weight-based intranasal atomized lidocaine to decrease pain caused by NGT insertion. Ongoing safety evaluation and research is warranted since this is the first known report in the literature describing implementation of a weight-based dosing SOP.

鼻胃管置入前的疼痛处理:雾化利多卡因。
鼻胃管(NGT)的插入对所有年龄的患者都是痛苦的。成人患者的随机临床试验支持使用某种形式的局部利多卡因来减轻NGT插入相关的疼痛。对儿科证据的回顾也证实了NGT插入是痛苦的,并为确定利多卡因浓度、剂量和给药方法提供了指导。爱荷华州循证实践促进高质量护理模型为所有患者在植入NGT之前雾化利多卡因管理的基于体重的实践标准(SOP)的发展提供了框架。为了方便使用,在电子健康记录(EHR)中将NGT放置和利多卡因雾化给药的订单联系起来。雾化利多卡因通过患者特异性鼻黏膜给药装置给予。评估措施包括实施前和实施后问卷调查,测量儿童患者对NGT插入的不适(0-10分;实施前均值= 7.4;实施后平均= 6.5),通过自动配药柜报告监测雾化利多卡因的使用情况,征求家庭和使用者的意见,监测机构患者安全(事件)和药物不良反应报告。实施后未发现雾化利多卡因相关的患者安全或药物不良反应。所有年龄的患者都受益于基于体重的鼻内雾化利多卡因,以减少NGT插入引起的疼痛。由于这是文献中第一份描述基于重量给药SOP实施的已知报告,因此有必要进行安全性评估和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信