Breast cancer recurrence in patients receiving epidural and paravertebral anesthesia: a retrospective, case-control study.

Stephanie L Koonce, Sarah A Mclaughlin, Dustin L Eck, Steven Porter, Sanjay Bagaria, Steven R Clendenen, Christopher B Robards
{"title":"Breast cancer recurrence in patients receiving epidural and paravertebral anesthesia: a retrospective, case-control study.","authors":"Stephanie L Koonce,&nbsp;Sarah A Mclaughlin,&nbsp;Dustin L Eck,&nbsp;Steven Porter,&nbsp;Sanjay Bagaria,&nbsp;Steven R Clendenen,&nbsp;Christopher B Robards","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Studies have suggested an association between the use of regional paravertebral or epidural anesthesia and a reduction in tumor recurrence following breast cancer surgery. To examine this relationship we performed a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery receiving regional, regional and general, or general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed of patients undergoing surgery for stage 0 to III breast cancer. Patients identified as receiving regional anesthesia were then matched for age, stage, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor status, and HER-2 expression with patients who received no regional anesthesia. Univariate (Pearson's χ2 test and odds ratio) and multivariate logistic analyses with backward stepwise regression were performed to determine factors associated with cancer recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1998 and 2007, 816 women underwent surgery for stage 0-III breast cancer at our institution. Forty-five patients developed tumors. Univariate analysis showed the use of regional anesthesia trended towards reduced cancer recurrence, but it did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.06). Higher recurrence rates were associated with ER positive status (p = 0.003) and higher tumor stage (p < 0.0001). Age and HER-2 status were not associated with increased cancer recurrence (both p > 0.11). Multivariate analysis confirmed ER status and stage as independently influential (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although we found a trend towards reduced breast cancer recurrence with the use of regional anesthesia, univariate analysis did not reach statistical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"22 6","pages":"567-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Studies have suggested an association between the use of regional paravertebral or epidural anesthesia and a reduction in tumor recurrence following breast cancer surgery. To examine this relationship we performed a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery receiving regional, regional and general, or general anesthesia.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients undergoing surgery for stage 0 to III breast cancer. Patients identified as receiving regional anesthesia were then matched for age, stage, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor status, and HER-2 expression with patients who received no regional anesthesia. Univariate (Pearson's χ2 test and odds ratio) and multivariate logistic analyses with backward stepwise regression were performed to determine factors associated with cancer recurrence.

Results: Between 1998 and 2007, 816 women underwent surgery for stage 0-III breast cancer at our institution. Forty-five patients developed tumors. Univariate analysis showed the use of regional anesthesia trended towards reduced cancer recurrence, but it did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.06). Higher recurrence rates were associated with ER positive status (p = 0.003) and higher tumor stage (p < 0.0001). Age and HER-2 status were not associated with increased cancer recurrence (both p > 0.11). Multivariate analysis confirmed ER status and stage as independently influential (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001 respectively).

Conclusion: Although we found a trend towards reduced breast cancer recurrence with the use of regional anesthesia, univariate analysis did not reach statistical significance.

接受硬膜外和椎旁麻醉的乳腺癌复发:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
目的:研究表明,局部椎旁或硬膜外麻醉与乳腺癌手术后肿瘤复发的减少有关。为了检验这种关系,我们对接受局部、局部和全身麻醉或全身麻醉的乳腺癌手术患者进行了回顾性病例对照研究。方法:对0 ~ III期乳腺癌手术患者进行回顾性分析。然后将接受区域麻醉的患者与未接受区域麻醉的患者进行年龄、分期、雌激素受体(ER)状态、孕激素受体状态和HER-2表达的匹配。采用单因素(Pearson’s χ2检验和优势比)和多因素logistic回归分析确定与癌症复发相关的因素。结果:1998年至2007年间,816名妇女在我们的机构接受了0-III期乳腺癌手术。45名患者出现肿瘤。单因素分析显示,区域麻醉有降低肿瘤复发率的趋势,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.06)。复发率高与ER阳性(p = 0.003)和肿瘤分期高相关(p < 0.0001)。年龄和HER-2状态与癌症复发率增加无关(p > 0.11)。多因素分析证实ER状态和分期是独立影响因素(p = 0.002和p < 0.0001)。结论:虽然我们发现区域麻醉有降低乳腺癌复发率的趋势,但单因素分析不具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信