[Teeth whitening with 6% hydrogen peroxide vs. 35% hydrogen peroxide, a comparative controlled study].

Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993) Pub Date : 2015-01-01
O Zuabi
{"title":"[Teeth whitening with 6% hydrogen peroxide vs. 35% hydrogen peroxide, a comparative controlled study].","authors":"O Zuabi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In light of the lately changes in regulations regarding teeth whitening in Europe, the use of 6% hydrogen peroxide using a dedicated device becomes the first choice treatment option. The purpose of this controlled, randomized, parallel, blinded six months prospective study was to compare this method of teeth whitening treatment with that of in-office method using 35% hydrogen peroxide.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>75 healthy american individuals, ages 18-62, participated in this study. The participants were divided into 3 groups: a 6% hydrogenperoxide group, a 35% hydrogen peroxide group and a placebo control group. Whitening procedures were performed on intact frontal teeth with color shade of A3 or higher. A controlled color measurement was performed before, immediately after, three and six months post treatment. Clinical periodontal indices, oral mucosa changes, side effects and participant satisfaction, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 6% group, the change in color shades immediately after treatment, three and six months after treatment were 2.37, 2.17 and 1.95, respectively. Tooth color changes in 35% group immediately after completion of treatment, three and six months after treatment were 3.68, 2.60 and 1.70, respectively. Statistical significant differences were found in both treatment groups between the baseline color shade and the post treatment color shade. The results were stable three and six months after treatment. Statistically significant difference between the groups immediately after treatment (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups three and six months after treatment (p > 0.5000). Side effects such as oral mucosa irritation, burns or sensitive teeth were mild and resolved without intervention. A high satisfaction level was recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tooth color shade can be substantially improved using a dedicated device with 6% hydrogen peroxide only. This whitening method can be helpful for the dentist in: home continuing treatment post in- office whitening specially in case with severe staining, maintenance of in-office whitening treatment outcomes or as an OTC home whitening procedure for patients with limmited budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":82453,"journal":{"name":"Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993)","volume":"32 1","pages":"38-44, 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In light of the lately changes in regulations regarding teeth whitening in Europe, the use of 6% hydrogen peroxide using a dedicated device becomes the first choice treatment option. The purpose of this controlled, randomized, parallel, blinded six months prospective study was to compare this method of teeth whitening treatment with that of in-office method using 35% hydrogen peroxide.

Materials and methods: 75 healthy american individuals, ages 18-62, participated in this study. The participants were divided into 3 groups: a 6% hydrogenperoxide group, a 35% hydrogen peroxide group and a placebo control group. Whitening procedures were performed on intact frontal teeth with color shade of A3 or higher. A controlled color measurement was performed before, immediately after, three and six months post treatment. Clinical periodontal indices, oral mucosa changes, side effects and participant satisfaction, were recorded.

Results: In the 6% group, the change in color shades immediately after treatment, three and six months after treatment were 2.37, 2.17 and 1.95, respectively. Tooth color changes in 35% group immediately after completion of treatment, three and six months after treatment were 3.68, 2.60 and 1.70, respectively. Statistical significant differences were found in both treatment groups between the baseline color shade and the post treatment color shade. The results were stable three and six months after treatment. Statistically significant difference between the groups immediately after treatment (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups three and six months after treatment (p > 0.5000). Side effects such as oral mucosa irritation, burns or sensitive teeth were mild and resolved without intervention. A high satisfaction level was recorded.

Conclusions: Tooth color shade can be substantially improved using a dedicated device with 6% hydrogen peroxide only. This whitening method can be helpful for the dentist in: home continuing treatment post in- office whitening specially in case with severe staining, maintenance of in-office whitening treatment outcomes or as an OTC home whitening procedure for patients with limmited budget.

[6%过氧化氢和35%过氧化氢美白牙齿,比较对照研究]。
简介:鉴于最近欧洲有关牙齿美白法规的变化,使用专用设备使用6%过氧化氢成为首选治疗方案。这项为期6个月的对照、随机、平行、盲法前瞻性研究的目的是将这种牙齿美白治疗方法与使用35%过氧化氢的办公室方法进行比较。材料与方法:75名年龄在18-62岁的健康美国人参加了本研究。参与者被分为3组:过氧化氢6%组,过氧化氢35%组和安慰剂对照组。对色度为A3或以上的完整门牙进行增白。在治疗前、治疗后立即、治疗后3个月和6个月进行对照颜色测量。记录临床牙周指标、口腔黏膜变化、不良反应及参与者满意度。结果:6%组治疗后即刻、治疗后3个月、6个月色度变化分别为2.37、2.17、1.95。35%组治疗结束后即刻、治疗后3个月、6个月牙色变化分别为3.68、2.60、1.70。在两个治疗组中,基线色度和治疗后色度之间存在统计学上的显著差异。治疗后3个月和6个月的结果稳定。治疗后即刻组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。治疗后3个月、6个月两组比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.5000)。副作用如口腔黏膜刺激、烧伤或敏感牙齿轻微,无需干预即可解决。满意度很高。结论:仅使用含有6%过氧化氢的专用装置可显著改善牙齿色度。这种美白方法可以帮助牙医在家继续治疗,特别是在严重染色的情况下,维持在办公室美白治疗的结果,或作为一个非处方家庭美白程序,为预算有限的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书