Does etiology of acute pancreatitis matter? A review of 391 consecutive episodes.

IF 0.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gunther Weitz, Julia Woitalla, Peter Wellhöner, Klaus Schmidt, Jürgen Büning, Klaus Fellermann
{"title":"Does etiology of acute pancreatitis matter? A review of 391 consecutive episodes.","authors":"Gunther Weitz,&nbsp;Julia Woitalla,&nbsp;Peter Wellhöner,&nbsp;Klaus Schmidt,&nbsp;Jürgen Büning,&nbsp;Klaus Fellermann","doi":"10.6092/1590-8577/2959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Acute pancreatitis can be triggered by a variety of factors ranging from short lasting to sustained disruptions. It is plausible that the characteristics and course of disease differ among etiologies. Data distinguishing characteristics of patients with pancreatitis of biliary, alcoholic, idiopathic or other origin are scarce and conflicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare patients' characteristics, baseline parameters on admission, and outcome in patients with an episode of acute pancreatitis in whom the etiology was thoroughly determined.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three-hundreds and 91 consecutive episodes of acute pancreatitis through the years 2008 to 2011.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Gender, age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, history of pancreatitis, heart rate, blood pressure, plasma lipase, hematocrit, plasma creatinine, white blood cell count, rate of persistent organ failure and necrosis, maximum C-reactive protein, duration of hospitalization, mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were marked differences between the groups. Biliary etiology was associated with higher age and body weight, female predominance, higher plasma lipase, and a favourable outcome. Alcoholic etiology had male predominance, a tendency for initial hemoconcentration, a lower plasma lipase, and the highest rate of necrosis. Idiopathic etiology had the highest rate of persistent organ failure and the highest mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biliary, alcoholic and idiopathic acute pancreatitis should be treated as distinct entities. While alcoholic episodes have the highest risk of necrosis, the worst outcome was observed in the idiopathic group. Hence, finding no causality for an episode of acute pancreatitis after thorough investigation might be a predictor for poor outcome. Larger studies are warranted to confirm this.</p>","PeriodicalId":47280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pancreas","volume":"16 2","pages":"171-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/2959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Context: Acute pancreatitis can be triggered by a variety of factors ranging from short lasting to sustained disruptions. It is plausible that the characteristics and course of disease differ among etiologies. Data distinguishing characteristics of patients with pancreatitis of biliary, alcoholic, idiopathic or other origin are scarce and conflicting.

Objective: To compare patients' characteristics, baseline parameters on admission, and outcome in patients with an episode of acute pancreatitis in whom the etiology was thoroughly determined.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Single center.

Patients: Three-hundreds and 91 consecutive episodes of acute pancreatitis through the years 2008 to 2011.

Main outcome measures: Gender, age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, history of pancreatitis, heart rate, blood pressure, plasma lipase, hematocrit, plasma creatinine, white blood cell count, rate of persistent organ failure and necrosis, maximum C-reactive protein, duration of hospitalization, mortality.

Results: There were marked differences between the groups. Biliary etiology was associated with higher age and body weight, female predominance, higher plasma lipase, and a favourable outcome. Alcoholic etiology had male predominance, a tendency for initial hemoconcentration, a lower plasma lipase, and the highest rate of necrosis. Idiopathic etiology had the highest rate of persistent organ failure and the highest mortality.

Conclusions: Biliary, alcoholic and idiopathic acute pancreatitis should be treated as distinct entities. While alcoholic episodes have the highest risk of necrosis, the worst outcome was observed in the idiopathic group. Hence, finding no causality for an episode of acute pancreatitis after thorough investigation might be a predictor for poor outcome. Larger studies are warranted to confirm this.

急性胰腺炎的病因重要吗?连续391集的回顾。
背景:急性胰腺炎可由多种因素触发,从短期持续到持续中断。病因不同,疾病的特点和病程不同,这似乎是合理的。胆道性胰腺炎、酒精性胰腺炎、特发性胰腺炎或其他来源的胰腺炎患者的特征区分数据很少且相互矛盾。目的:比较病因完全确定的急性胰腺炎发作患者的特征、入院时的基线参数和转归。设计:回顾性研究。设置:单中心。患者:2008年至2011年间,有30091例急性胰腺炎连续发作。主要观察指标:性别、年龄、体重指数、Charlson合并症指数、胰腺炎病史、心率、血压、血浆脂肪酶、血细胞比容、血浆肌酐、白细胞计数、持续性器官衰竭和坏死率、最大c反应蛋白、住院时间、死亡率。结果:两组间差异有统计学意义。胆道病因与较高的年龄和体重、女性优势、较高的血浆脂肪酶和良好的结局有关。酒精性病因以男性为主,有初始血浓缩倾向,血浆脂肪酶较低,坏死率最高。特发性病因的持久性器官衰竭发生率最高,死亡率最高。结论:胆道性、酒精性和特发性急性胰腺炎应作为不同的实体进行治疗。虽然酒精发作有最高的坏死风险,但在特发性组观察到最差的结果。因此,在彻底调查后发现急性胰腺炎发作没有因果关系可能是预后不良的预测因素。有必要进行更大规模的研究来证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Pancreas
Journal of the Pancreas GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信