Ultrasound-assisted focused open necrosectomy in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.

IF 0.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Guntars Pupelis, Vladimir Fokin, Kaspars Zeiza, Ita Kazaka, Jelizaveta Pereca, Vita Skuja, Viesturs Boka
{"title":"Ultrasound-assisted focused open necrosectomy in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.","authors":"Guntars Pupelis,&nbsp;Vladimir Fokin,&nbsp;Kaspars Zeiza,&nbsp;Ita Kazaka,&nbsp;Jelizaveta Pereca,&nbsp;Vita Skuja,&nbsp;Viesturs Boka","doi":"10.6092/1590-8577/2953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis includes percutaneous drainage of acute necrotic collections and sequestrectomy in the late phase of the disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the conventional open necrosectomy (CON) approach with the alternative focused open necrosectomy (FON) approach in patients with infected necrosis and progression of sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were included in the study prospectively from January 2004 to July 2014. All patients had been admitted with the first or a new episode of disease. Symptomatic large fluid collections were drained percutaneously. The step-up approach was used in patients with several distant localizations of infected necrosis. The methods were analysed by comparing the individual severity according to the ASA, APACHE II and SOFA scores, infection rate, postoperative complication rate and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 patients were included in the FON group and 39 in the CON group. The incidence of infection was similar in groups. More ASA III comorbid conditions, a higher APACHE II score, a more frequent need for renal replacement therapy was observed in the CON group. The postoperative complication rate was in the range of 32% to 44%; mortality reached 6.5% in the FON group and 12.8% in the CON group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comorbid conditions, organ failure, and infection are the main risk factors in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. The step-up approach and perioperative ultrasonography navigation improves the clinical outcome and reduces the extent of invasive surgical intervention in patients unsuited to other minimally invasive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pancreas","volume":"16 2","pages":"150-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/2953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Context: The surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis includes percutaneous drainage of acute necrotic collections and sequestrectomy in the late phase of the disease.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the conventional open necrosectomy (CON) approach with the alternative focused open necrosectomy (FON) approach in patients with infected necrosis and progression of sepsis.

Methods: Patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were included in the study prospectively from January 2004 to July 2014. All patients had been admitted with the first or a new episode of disease. Symptomatic large fluid collections were drained percutaneously. The step-up approach was used in patients with several distant localizations of infected necrosis. The methods were analysed by comparing the individual severity according to the ASA, APACHE II and SOFA scores, infection rate, postoperative complication rate and mortality.

Results: A total of 31 patients were included in the FON group and 39 in the CON group. The incidence of infection was similar in groups. More ASA III comorbid conditions, a higher APACHE II score, a more frequent need for renal replacement therapy was observed in the CON group. The postoperative complication rate was in the range of 32% to 44%; mortality reached 6.5% in the FON group and 12.8% in the CON group.

Conclusions: Comorbid conditions, organ failure, and infection are the main risk factors in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. The step-up approach and perioperative ultrasonography navigation improves the clinical outcome and reduces the extent of invasive surgical intervention in patients unsuited to other minimally invasive procedures.

超声辅助下聚焦开放性坏死切除术治疗坏死性胰腺炎。
背景:坏死性胰腺炎的外科治疗包括急性坏死性集合的经皮引流和疾病晚期的隔离切除术。目的:本研究的目的是比较传统的开放性坏死切除术(CON)入路与选择性聚焦开放性坏死切除术(FON)入路在感染性坏死和脓毒症进展患者中的应用。方法:前瞻性纳入2004年1月~ 2014年7月急性坏死性胰腺炎患者。所有患者均因首次发病或新发病而入院。有症状的大量积液经皮引流。逐步入路用于几个远处感染坏死的患者。根据ASA、APACHE II和SOFA评分、感染率、术后并发症发生率和死亡率,比较两种方法的个体严重程度。结果:FON组31例,CON组39例。各组感染发生率相似。CON组观察到更多的ASA III合并症,更高的APACHE II评分,更频繁地需要肾脏替代治疗。术后并发症发生率为32% ~ 44%;FON组死亡率为6.5%,CON组为12.8%。结论:合并症、器官衰竭和感染是坏死性胰腺炎患者的主要危险因素。升压入路和围手术期超声导航改善了临床结果,减少了不适合其他微创手术的患者的侵入性手术干预程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Pancreas
Journal of the Pancreas GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信