Reduction of pain via platelet-rich plasma in split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a series of matched pairs.

Q1 Health Professions
Diabetic Foot & Ankle Pub Date : 2015-01-22 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3402/dfa.v6.24972
John D Miller, Timothy M Rankin, Natalie T Hua, Tina Ontiveros, Nicholas A Giovinco, Joseph L Mills, David G Armstrong
{"title":"Reduction of pain via platelet-rich plasma in split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a series of matched pairs.","authors":"John D Miller,&nbsp;Timothy M Rankin,&nbsp;Natalie T Hua,&nbsp;Tina Ontiveros,&nbsp;Nicholas A Giovinco,&nbsp;Joseph L Mills,&nbsp;David G Armstrong","doi":"10.3402/dfa.v6.24972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past decade, autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has seen increasingly widespread integration into medical specialties. PRP application is known to accelerate wound epithelialization rates, and may also reduce postoperative wound site pain. Recently, we observed an increase in patient satisfaction following PRP gel (Angel, Cytomedix, Rockville, MD) application to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. We assessed all patients known to our university-based hospital service who underwent multiple STSGs up to the year 2014, with at least one treated with topical PRP. Based on these criteria, five patients aged 48.4±17.6 (80% male) were identified who could serve as their own control, with mean time of 4.4±5.1 years between operations. In both therapies, initial dressing changes occurred on postoperative day (POD) 7, with donor site pain measured by Likert visual pain scale. Paired t-tests compared the size and thickness of harvested skin graft and patient pain level, and STSG thickness and surface area were comparable between control and PRP interventions (p>0.05 for all). Donor site pain was reduced from an average of 7.2 (±2.6) to 3 (±3.7), an average reduction in pain of 4.2 (standard error 1.1, p=0.0098) following PRP use. Based on these results, the authors suggest PRP as a beneficial adjunct for reducing donor site pain following STSG harvest. </p>","PeriodicalId":45385,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/dfa.v6.24972","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v6.24972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In the past decade, autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has seen increasingly widespread integration into medical specialties. PRP application is known to accelerate wound epithelialization rates, and may also reduce postoperative wound site pain. Recently, we observed an increase in patient satisfaction following PRP gel (Angel, Cytomedix, Rockville, MD) application to split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. We assessed all patients known to our university-based hospital service who underwent multiple STSGs up to the year 2014, with at least one treated with topical PRP. Based on these criteria, five patients aged 48.4±17.6 (80% male) were identified who could serve as their own control, with mean time of 4.4±5.1 years between operations. In both therapies, initial dressing changes occurred on postoperative day (POD) 7, with donor site pain measured by Likert visual pain scale. Paired t-tests compared the size and thickness of harvested skin graft and patient pain level, and STSG thickness and surface area were comparable between control and PRP interventions (p>0.05 for all). Donor site pain was reduced from an average of 7.2 (±2.6) to 3 (±3.7), an average reduction in pain of 4.2 (standard error 1.1, p=0.0098) following PRP use. Based on these results, the authors suggest PRP as a beneficial adjunct for reducing donor site pain following STSG harvest.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在裂厚皮肤移植供体部位通过富血小板血浆减轻疼痛:一系列匹配对。
在过去的十年中,自体富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗已经越来越广泛地融入医学专业。已知PRP应用可加速伤口上皮化率,也可减少术后伤口部位疼痛。最近,我们观察到PRP凝胶(Angel, Cytomedix, Rockville, MD)应用于分厚皮肤移植(STSG)供体部位后患者满意度的增加。我们评估了所有在2014年之前接受过多次性传播感染的大学医院服务的患者,其中至少有一人接受了局部PRP治疗。根据这些标准,确定5例患者(48.4±17.6岁,其中80%为男性)可作为自我对照,平均手术间隔时间为4.4±5.1年。在两种治疗中,最初的敷料改变发生在术后第7天(POD),用Likert视觉疼痛量表测量供体部位疼痛。配对t检验比较了移植皮肤的大小和厚度与患者疼痛程度,对照组和PRP干预之间的STSG厚度和表面积具有可比性(均p>0.05)。使用PRP后,供体部位疼痛从平均7.2(±2.6)降低到3(±3.7),疼痛平均降低4.2(标准误差1.1,p=0.0098)。基于这些结果,作者建议PRP作为减少STSG收获后供体部位疼痛的有益辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetic Foot & Ankle
Diabetic Foot & Ankle ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信