Creation and Validation of the Self-esteem/Self-image Female Sexuality (SESIFS) Questionnaire.

Clinical medicine insights. Women's health Pub Date : 2014-12-14 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.4137/CMWH.S19182

Maria Co Lordello, Carolina C Ambrogini, Ana L Fanganiello, Teresa R Embiruçu, Marina M Zaneti, Laise Veloso, Livia B Piccirillo, Bianca L Crude, Mauro Haidar, Ivaldo Silva

{"title":"Creation and Validation of the Self-esteem/Self-image Female Sexuality (SESIFS) Questionnaire.","authors":"Maria Co Lordello, Carolina C Ambrogini, Ana L Fanganiello, Teresa R Embiruçu, Marina M Zaneti, Laise Veloso, Livia B Piccirillo, Bianca L Crude, Mauro Haidar, Ivaldo Silva","doi":"10.4137/CMWH.S19182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Self-esteem and self-image are psychological aspects that affect sexual function.Aims: To validate a new measurement tool that correlates the concepts of self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality.Methods: A 20-question test (the self-esteem/self-image female sexuality [SESIFS] questionnaire) was created and tested on 208 women. Participants answered: Rosenberg's self-esteem scale, the female sexual quotient (FSQ), and the SESIFS questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test concurrent validity of the SESIFS against Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and the FSQ. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.Result: The new questionnaire had a good overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha r = 0.862, p < 0.001), but the sexual domain scored lower than expected (r = 0.65). The validity was good: overall score r = 0.38, p < 0.001, self-esteem domain r = 0.32, p < 0.001, self-image domain r = 0.31, p < 0.001, sexual domain r = 0.29, p < 0.001.Conclusions: The SESIFS questionnaire has limitations in measuring the correlation among self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality domains. A new, revised version is being tested and will be presented in an upcoming publication.","PeriodicalId":90142,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","volume":"7 ","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/CMWH.S19182","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/CMWH.S19182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Self-esteem and self-image are psychological aspects that affect sexual function.

Aims: To validate a new measurement tool that correlates the concepts of self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality.

Methods: A 20-question test (the self-esteem/self-image female sexuality [SESIFS] questionnaire) was created and tested on 208 women. Participants answered: Rosenberg's self-esteem scale, the female sexual quotient (FSQ), and the SESIFS questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test concurrent validity of the SESIFS against Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and the FSQ. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

Result: The new questionnaire had a good overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha r = 0.862, p < 0.001), but the sexual domain scored lower than expected (r = 0.65). The validity was good: overall score r = 0.38, p < 0.001, self-esteem domain r = 0.32, p < 0.001, self-image domain r = 0.31, p < 0.001, sexual domain r = 0.29, p < 0.001.

Conclusions: The SESIFS questionnaire has limitations in measuring the correlation among self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality domains. A new, revised version is being tested and will be presented in an upcoming publication.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自尊/自我形象女性性(SESIFS)问卷的编制与验证。

自尊和自我形象是影响性功能的心理方面。目的:验证一种新的测量工具，它将自尊、自我形象和性的概念联系起来。方法:采用自尊/自我形象女性性行为问卷(SESIFS)对208名女性进行问卷调查。参与者回答:罗森博格自尊量表、女性性商(FSQ)和SESIFS问卷。采用Pearson相关系数检验SESIFS与Rosenberg自尊量表和FSQ的并发效度。采用Cronbach’s alpha系数检验信度。结果:新问卷总体信度较好(Cronbach’s alpha r = 0.862, p < 0.001)，但性别领域得分低于预期(r = 0.65)。效度较好:总分r = 0.38, p < 0.001，自尊领域r = 0.32, p < 0.001，自我形象领域r = 0.31, p < 0.001，性领域r = 0.29, p < 0.001。结论:SESIFS问卷在测量自尊、自我形象和性取向之间的相关性方面存在局限性。一个新的修订版本正在测试中，并将在即将出版的出版物中提出。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical medicine insights. Women's health

自引率

0.00%

发文量