Functional outcome and satisfaction with a "self-care" protocol for the management of mallet finger injuries: a case-series.

Journal of trauma management & outcomes Pub Date : 2014-12-10 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13032-014-0021-y
Katriona Brooksbank, Paul J Jenkins, Iain C Anthony, Alisdair Gilmour, Margaret P Nugent, Lech A Rymaszewski
{"title":"Functional outcome and satisfaction with a \"self-care\" protocol for the management of mallet finger injuries: a case-series.","authors":"Katriona Brooksbank,&nbsp;Paul J Jenkins,&nbsp;Iain C Anthony,&nbsp;Alisdair Gilmour,&nbsp;Margaret P Nugent,&nbsp;Lech A Rymaszewski","doi":"10.1186/s13032-014-0021-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mallet finger injuries are usually successfully treated non-operatively with a splint. Most patients are reviewed at least twice in a clinic after the initial presentation in A&E. A new protocol promoting \"self-care\" was introduced at our institution. Patients were provided with structured verbal and written information, and given access to a telephone helpline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective electronic patient record was used to identify all patients who presented to the emergency department with a mallet finger with a minimum six month follow-up. A satisfaction and patient reported outcome measure was administered via a postal questionnaire. The response rate was 36/47 (77%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median QuickDASH score was 2.3 (IQR 0 to 4.6). All patients were satisfied with the treatment plan provided. Nine used the helpline and all were satisfied with information given. Although 13 patients reported some extensor lag, or bump, they had no functional limitation. Seven patients were reviewed by the general practitioner or other clinicians during their treatment period for issues such a skin care, splint size changes or sickness certification. Five were subsequently reviewed at the end of their treatment period in a clinic at their request, or their general practitioner, but did not require further surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-care for mallet finger injuries, with adequate patient information and telephone back-up, leads to acceptable functional results and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":87652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","volume":"8 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13032-014-0021-y","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13032-014-0021-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background: Mallet finger injuries are usually successfully treated non-operatively with a splint. Most patients are reviewed at least twice in a clinic after the initial presentation in A&E. A new protocol promoting "self-care" was introduced at our institution. Patients were provided with structured verbal and written information, and given access to a telephone helpline.

Methods: A prospective electronic patient record was used to identify all patients who presented to the emergency department with a mallet finger with a minimum six month follow-up. A satisfaction and patient reported outcome measure was administered via a postal questionnaire. The response rate was 36/47 (77%).

Results: The median QuickDASH score was 2.3 (IQR 0 to 4.6). All patients were satisfied with the treatment plan provided. Nine used the helpline and all were satisfied with information given. Although 13 patients reported some extensor lag, or bump, they had no functional limitation. Seven patients were reviewed by the general practitioner or other clinicians during their treatment period for issues such a skin care, splint size changes or sickness certification. Five were subsequently reviewed at the end of their treatment period in a clinic at their request, or their general practitioner, but did not require further surgical intervention.

Conclusions: Self-care for mallet finger injuries, with adequate patient information and telephone back-up, leads to acceptable functional results and satisfaction.

Level of evidence: III.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

锤状指损伤管理的“自我护理”方案的功能结果和满意度:一个病例系列。
背景:锤状指损伤通常是成功的非手术治疗夹板。大多数患者在急诊室初次就诊后至少在诊所复查两次。我们的机构推行了一项促进“自我照顾”的新方案。向患者提供结构化的口头和书面信息,并提供电话求助热线。方法:一份前瞻性的电子病历被用来识别所有在急诊室就诊的锤状指患者,随访时间至少为6个月。通过邮寄问卷进行满意度和患者报告的结果测量。有效率为36/47(77%)。结果:QuickDASH评分中位数为2.3 (IQR 0 ~ 4.6)。所有患者均对所提供的治疗方案满意。其中9人使用了求助热线,所有人都对提供的信息感到满意。虽然13例患者报告了一些伸肌滞后或隆起,但他们没有功能限制。7名患者在治疗期间由全科医生或其他临床医生对皮肤护理、夹板大小变化或疾病证明等问题进行了审查。5名患者在治疗期结束后应其要求或在全科医生处接受复查,但不需要进一步的手术干预。结论:锤状指损伤的自我护理,在充分的患者信息和电话支持下,可获得良好的功能效果和满意度。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书