NORMATIVE STANDARDS AND PATTERNING OF FAT AND MUSCLE IN WHITE AND BLACK NEWBORN INFANTS.

Jon M Brandt, G Andrew Allen, Merlin G Butler
{"title":"NORMATIVE STANDARDS AND PATTERNING OF FAT AND MUSCLE IN WHITE AND BLACK NEWBORN INFANTS.","authors":"Jon M Brandt,&nbsp;G Andrew Allen,&nbsp;Merlin G Butler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the lack of normative data in newborns, we report fat and muscle patterning, and standards for the sums of fat and muscle areas and muscle circumferences for arm, forearm, thigh, and calf in white and black newborn infants that may have clinical application in the assessment of body composition in newborns. Significant differences were found between white males and white females in fatness patterning: white female newborns were larger for all 21 variables except height. Statistically significant differences (<i>t</i> test; p < 0.05) existed for five skinfold measurements (forearm, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, medial calf), three limb fat areas (forearm, thigh, calf), and the sums of the skinfolds and fat areas despite similar limb circumferences. Black female newborns were larger than black males for five of the eight skinfolds (with a significant difference observed in medial calf skinfold), for all of the limb fat areas, and for the sums of the skinfolds and fat areas. Despite their larger skinfolds and fat areas, black females had smaller circumferences. No sex-related trends or significantly different variables were observed in the muscle patterning of white infants. Differences in muscle patterning were observed between black males and black females, with males having larger values for all 14 variables. Statistically significant differences were found between white and black infants, with white newborns having greater height, medial calf skinfold, and calf fat area.</p>","PeriodicalId":90487,"journal":{"name":"Dysmorphology and clinical genetics : official publication of the Center for Birth Defects Information Services, Inc","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258714/pdf/nihms-615889.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysmorphology and clinical genetics : official publication of the Center for Birth Defects Information Services, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the lack of normative data in newborns, we report fat and muscle patterning, and standards for the sums of fat and muscle areas and muscle circumferences for arm, forearm, thigh, and calf in white and black newborn infants that may have clinical application in the assessment of body composition in newborns. Significant differences were found between white males and white females in fatness patterning: white female newborns were larger for all 21 variables except height. Statistically significant differences (t test; p < 0.05) existed for five skinfold measurements (forearm, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, medial calf), three limb fat areas (forearm, thigh, calf), and the sums of the skinfolds and fat areas despite similar limb circumferences. Black female newborns were larger than black males for five of the eight skinfolds (with a significant difference observed in medial calf skinfold), for all of the limb fat areas, and for the sums of the skinfolds and fat areas. Despite their larger skinfolds and fat areas, black females had smaller circumferences. No sex-related trends or significantly different variables were observed in the muscle patterning of white infants. Differences in muscle patterning were observed between black males and black females, with males having larger values for all 14 variables. Statistically significant differences were found between white and black infants, with white newborns having greater height, medial calf skinfold, and calf fat area.

白人和黑人新生儿脂肪和肌肉的规范标准和模式。
由于缺乏新生儿的规范数据,我们报道了白人和黑人新生儿的脂肪和肌肉模式,以及手臂、前臂、大腿和小腿的脂肪和肌肉面积和肌肉周长之和的标准,这些标准可能在评估新生儿身体成分方面具有临床应用价值。白人男性和白人女性在肥胖模式上存在显著差异:除了身高外,白人女性新生儿在所有21个变量上都更大。差异有统计学意义(t检验;5个皮褶测量值(前臂、肩胛下、髌上、大腿、小腿内侧)、3个肢体脂肪区(前臂、大腿、小腿)以及相似肢体周长的皮褶和脂肪区总和均存在P < 0.05)。黑人女性新生儿在8个皮肤褶皱中的5个(在小腿内侧的皮肤褶皱中观察到显著差异)、所有肢体脂肪区域以及皮肤褶皱和脂肪区域的总和上都比黑人男性大。尽管黑人女性的皮肤褶皱和脂肪区域较大,但她们的周长较小。在白人婴儿的肌肉模式中,没有观察到与性别相关的趋势或显著不同的变量。在黑人男性和黑人女性之间观察到肌肉模式的差异,男性在所有14个变量中都有更大的值。在白人和黑人婴儿之间发现了统计学上的显著差异,白人新生儿有更高的身高,内侧小腿皮褶和小腿脂肪面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信