Clinical practice and self-awareness as determinants of empathy in undergraduate education: a qualitative short survey at three medical schools in Germany.

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2014-11-17 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000938
Florian Ahrweiler, Christian Scheffer, Gudrun Roling, Hadass Goldblatt, Eckhart G Hahn, Melanie Neumann
{"title":"Clinical practice and self-awareness as determinants of empathy in undergraduate education: a qualitative short survey at three medical schools in Germany.","authors":"Florian Ahrweiler, Christian Scheffer, Gudrun Roling, Hadass Goldblatt, Eckhart G Hahn, Melanie Neumann","doi":"10.3205/zma000938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study aim: </strong>Physician empathy constitutes an outcome-relevant aim of medical education. Yet, the factors promoting and inhibiting physician empathy have not yet been extensively researched, especially in Germany. In this study, we explored German medical students' views of the factors promoting and inhibiting their empathy and how their experiences were related to their curricula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative short survey was conducted at three medical schools: Bochum University, the University of Cologne and Witten/Herdecke University. Students were invited to complete an anonymous written questionnaire comprised of open-ended questions inquiring about the educational content of and situations during their medical education that positively or negatively impacted their empathy. Data were analyzed through qualitative content analysis according to the methods of Green and Thorogood.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 students participated in the survey. Respondents reported that practice-based education involving patient contact and teaching with reference to clinical practice and the patient's perspective improved their empathy, while a lack of these inhibited it. Students' internal reactions to patients, such as liking or disliking a patient, prejudice and other attitudes, were also considered to influence their empathy. Although each of the three schools takes a different approach to teaching interpersonal skills, no relevant differences were found in their students' responses concerning the possible determinants of empathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providing more training in practice and more contact with patients may be effective ways of promoting student empathy. Students need support in establishing therapeutic relationships with patients and in dealing with their own feelings and attitudes. Such support could be provided in the form of reflective practice training in order to promote self-awareness. More research is needed to evaluate these hypothetical conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 4","pages":"Doc46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000938","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Study aim: Physician empathy constitutes an outcome-relevant aim of medical education. Yet, the factors promoting and inhibiting physician empathy have not yet been extensively researched, especially in Germany. In this study, we explored German medical students' views of the factors promoting and inhibiting their empathy and how their experiences were related to their curricula.

Methods: A qualitative short survey was conducted at three medical schools: Bochum University, the University of Cologne and Witten/Herdecke University. Students were invited to complete an anonymous written questionnaire comprised of open-ended questions inquiring about the educational content of and situations during their medical education that positively or negatively impacted their empathy. Data were analyzed through qualitative content analysis according to the methods of Green and Thorogood.

Results: A total of 115 students participated in the survey. Respondents reported that practice-based education involving patient contact and teaching with reference to clinical practice and the patient's perspective improved their empathy, while a lack of these inhibited it. Students' internal reactions to patients, such as liking or disliking a patient, prejudice and other attitudes, were also considered to influence their empathy. Although each of the three schools takes a different approach to teaching interpersonal skills, no relevant differences were found in their students' responses concerning the possible determinants of empathy.

Conclusion: Providing more training in practice and more contact with patients may be effective ways of promoting student empathy. Students need support in establishing therapeutic relationships with patients and in dealing with their own feelings and attitudes. Such support could be provided in the form of reflective practice training in order to promote self-awareness. More research is needed to evaluate these hypothetical conclusions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床实践和自我意识是本科教育中共情的决定因素:一项在德国三所医学院进行的定性短期调查。
研究目的:医师共情构成医学教育的结果相关目标。然而,促进和抑制医生共情的因素尚未得到广泛的研究,特别是在德国。在本研究中,我们探讨了德国医学生对促进和抑制他们共情的因素的看法,以及他们的经历如何与他们的课程相关。方法:在波鸿大学、科隆大学和威滕/赫尔德克大学三所医学院进行定性短期调查。学生们被邀请完成一份匿名的书面问卷,问卷由开放式问题组成,询问他们在医学教育期间的教育内容和情况,这些内容和情况对他们的同理心有积极或消极的影响。根据Green和Thorogood的方法对数据进行定性含量分析。结果:共有115名学生参与调查。受访者报告说,以实践为基础的教育包括病人接触和教学,参考临床实践和病人的观点,提高了他们的同理心,而缺乏这些抑制了它。学生对病人的内在反应,如喜欢或不喜欢病人、偏见和其他态度,也被认为会影响他们的同理心。虽然这三所学校在教授人际交往技巧方面采取了不同的方法,但在学生对移情可能决定因素的反应中没有发现相关差异。结论:加强实践培训和与患者的接触可能是促进学生共情的有效途径。学生在与病人建立治疗关系和处理自己的感受和态度方面需要支持。这种支持可以以反思性实践训练的形式提供,以促进自我意识。需要更多的研究来评估这些假设的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信