A web-based survey of residents' views on advocating with patients for a healthy built environment in Canada.

International journal of family medicine Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-11-11 DOI:10.1155/2014/458184
Matthew Cruickshank, Marcus Law
{"title":"A web-based survey of residents' views on advocating with patients for a healthy built environment in Canada.","authors":"Matthew Cruickshank,&nbsp;Marcus Law","doi":"10.1155/2014/458184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. To determine family medicine residents' perceived knowledge and attitudes towards the built environment and their responsibility for health advocacy and to identify their perceived educational needs and barriers to patient education and advocacy. Methods. A web-based survey was conducted in Canada with University of Toronto family medicine residents. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results. 93% agreed or strongly agreed that built environment significantly impacts health. 64% thought educating patients on built environment is effective disease prevention; 52% considered this a role of family physicians. 78% reported that advocacy for built environment is effective disease prevention; 56% perceived this to be the family physician's role. 59% reported being knowledgeable to discuss how a patient's environment may affect his/her health; 35% reported being knowledgeable to participate in community discussions on built environment. 78% thought education would help with integration into practice. Inadequate time (92%), knowledge (73%), and remuneration (54%) were barriers. Conclusions. While residents perceived value in education and advocacy as disease prevention strategies and acknowledged the importance of a healthy built environment, they did not consider advocacy towards this the family physician's role. Barrier reduction and medical education may contribute to improved advocacy, ultimately improving physical activity levels and patient health outcomes. </p>","PeriodicalId":89569,"journal":{"name":"International journal of family medicine","volume":"2014 ","pages":"458184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/458184","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/458184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To determine family medicine residents' perceived knowledge and attitudes towards the built environment and their responsibility for health advocacy and to identify their perceived educational needs and barriers to patient education and advocacy. Methods. A web-based survey was conducted in Canada with University of Toronto family medicine residents. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results. 93% agreed or strongly agreed that built environment significantly impacts health. 64% thought educating patients on built environment is effective disease prevention; 52% considered this a role of family physicians. 78% reported that advocacy for built environment is effective disease prevention; 56% perceived this to be the family physician's role. 59% reported being knowledgeable to discuss how a patient's environment may affect his/her health; 35% reported being knowledgeable to participate in community discussions on built environment. 78% thought education would help with integration into practice. Inadequate time (92%), knowledge (73%), and remuneration (54%) were barriers. Conclusions. While residents perceived value in education and advocacy as disease prevention strategies and acknowledged the importance of a healthy built environment, they did not consider advocacy towards this the family physician's role. Barrier reduction and medical education may contribute to improved advocacy, ultimately improving physical activity levels and patient health outcomes.

一项关于加拿大居民对与患者一起倡导健康建筑环境的看法的网络调查。
目的。确定家庭医学住院医师对建筑环境的认知和态度,以及他们对健康宣传的责任,并确定他们对患者教育和宣传的感知教育需求和障碍。方法。一项基于网络的调查是在加拿大与多伦多大学家庭医学的居民一起进行的。对数据进行描述性分析。结果:93%的人同意或强烈同意建筑环境对健康有显著影响。64%的人认为对患者进行建筑环境教育是有效的疾病预防;52%的人认为这是家庭医生的职责。78%的人报告说,倡导建筑环境是有效的疾病预防;56%的人认为这是家庭医生的职责。59%的人报告说,他们了解如何讨论患者的环境可能影响他/她的健康;35%的受访者表示他们有足够的知识参与社区关于建筑环境的讨论。78%的人认为教育有助于融入实践。时间不足(92%)、知识不足(73%)和薪酬不足(54%)是障碍。结论。虽然居民认识到教育和宣传作为疾病预防战略的价值,并认识到健康建筑环境的重要性,但他们并不认为这方面的宣传是家庭医生的职责。减少障碍和医学教育可能有助于改善宣传,最终改善身体活动水平和患者健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书