Low back pain in primary care: a description of 1250 patients with low back pain in danish general and chiropractic practice.

International journal of family medicine Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-11-04 DOI:10.1155/2014/106102
Lise Hestbaek, Anders Munck, Lisbeth Hartvigsen, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Jens Søndergaard, Alice Kongsted
{"title":"Low back pain in primary care: a description of 1250 patients with low back pain in danish general and chiropractic practice.","authors":"Lise Hestbaek,&nbsp;Anders Munck,&nbsp;Lisbeth Hartvigsen,&nbsp;Dorte Ejg Jarbøl,&nbsp;Jens Søndergaard,&nbsp;Alice Kongsted","doi":"10.1155/2014/106102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study Design. Baseline description of a multicenter cohort study. Objective. To describe patients with low back pain (LBP) in both chiropractic and general practice in Denmark. Background. To optimize standards of care in the primary healthcare sector, detailed knowledge of the patient populations in different settings is needed. In Denmark, most LBP-patients access primary healthcare through chiropractic or general practice. Methods. Chiropractors and general practitioners recruited adult patients seeking care for LBP. Extensive baseline questionnaires were obtained and descriptive analyses presented separately for general and chiropractic practice patients, Mann-Whitney rank sum test and Pearson's chi-square test, were used to test for differences between the two populations. Results. Questionnaires were returned from 934 patients in chiropractic practice and 319 patients from general practice. Four out of five patients had had previous episodes, one-fourth were on sick leave, and the LBP considerably limited daily activities. The general practice patients were slightly older and less educated, more often females, and generally worse on all disease-related parameters than chiropractic patients. All differences were statistically significant. Conclusions. LBP in primary care was recurrent, causing sick leave and activity limitations. There were clear differences between the chiropractic and general practice populations in this study. </p>","PeriodicalId":89569,"journal":{"name":"International journal of family medicine","volume":"2014 ","pages":"106102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/106102","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/106102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Study Design. Baseline description of a multicenter cohort study. Objective. To describe patients with low back pain (LBP) in both chiropractic and general practice in Denmark. Background. To optimize standards of care in the primary healthcare sector, detailed knowledge of the patient populations in different settings is needed. In Denmark, most LBP-patients access primary healthcare through chiropractic or general practice. Methods. Chiropractors and general practitioners recruited adult patients seeking care for LBP. Extensive baseline questionnaires were obtained and descriptive analyses presented separately for general and chiropractic practice patients, Mann-Whitney rank sum test and Pearson's chi-square test, were used to test for differences between the two populations. Results. Questionnaires were returned from 934 patients in chiropractic practice and 319 patients from general practice. Four out of five patients had had previous episodes, one-fourth were on sick leave, and the LBP considerably limited daily activities. The general practice patients were slightly older and less educated, more often females, and generally worse on all disease-related parameters than chiropractic patients. All differences were statistically significant. Conclusions. LBP in primary care was recurrent, causing sick leave and activity limitations. There were clear differences between the chiropractic and general practice populations in this study.

Abstract Image

初级保健中的腰痛:对丹麦普通和脊椎指压治疗中1250例腰痛患者的描述。
研究设计。多中心队列研究的基线描述。目标。描述丹麦脊椎指压治疗和一般治疗中腰痛(LBP)的患者。背景。为了优化初级卫生保健部门的护理标准,需要详细了解不同环境下的患者群体。在丹麦,大多数lbp患者通过脊椎指压疗法或全科治疗获得初级保健。方法。脊医和全科医生招募了寻求腰痛治疗的成年患者。获得了广泛的基线问卷,并分别对全科和脊医患者进行了描述性分析,使用Mann-Whitney秩和检验和Pearson卡方检验来检验两个人群之间的差异。结果。对934名脊椎指压治疗患者和319名全科治疗患者进行问卷调查。五分之四的患者以前有过发作,四分之一的患者正在休病假,并且LBP严重限制了日常活动。全科病人年龄稍大,受教育程度较低,多为女性,在所有疾病相关参数上通常比脊椎指压病人差。差异均有统计学意义。结论。初级保健中的腰痛是反复发作的,导致病假和活动限制。在这项研究中,脊椎指压疗法和全科治疗人群之间存在明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书