Atrial fibrillation (acute onset).

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2014-11-27
Gregory Y H Lip, Stavros Apostolakis
{"title":"Atrial fibrillation (acute onset).","authors":"Gregory Y H Lip,&nbsp;Stavros Apostolakis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute atrial fibrillation is rapid, irregular, and chaotic atrial activity of recent onset. Various definitions of acute atrial fibrillation have been used in the literature, but for the purposes of this review we have included studies where atrial fibrillation may have occurred up to 7 days previously. Risk factors for acute atrial fibrillation include increasing age, cardiovascular disease, alcohol, diabetes, and lung disease. Acute atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke and heart failure. The condition resolves spontaneously within 24 to 48 hours in more than 50% of people; however, many people will require interventions to control heart rate or restore sinus rhythm.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of interventions to prevent embolism, for conversion to sinus rhythm, and to control heart rate in people with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (within 7 days) who are haemodynamically stable? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 26 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: amiodarone, antithrombotic treatment before cardioversion, atenolol, bisoprolol, carvedilol, digoxin, diltiazem, direct current cardioversion, flecainide, metoprolol, nebivolol, propafenone, sotalol, timolol, and verapamil.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246362/pdf/2014-0210.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute atrial fibrillation is rapid, irregular, and chaotic atrial activity of recent onset. Various definitions of acute atrial fibrillation have been used in the literature, but for the purposes of this review we have included studies where atrial fibrillation may have occurred up to 7 days previously. Risk factors for acute atrial fibrillation include increasing age, cardiovascular disease, alcohol, diabetes, and lung disease. Acute atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke and heart failure. The condition resolves spontaneously within 24 to 48 hours in more than 50% of people; however, many people will require interventions to control heart rate or restore sinus rhythm.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of interventions to prevent embolism, for conversion to sinus rhythm, and to control heart rate in people with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (within 7 days) who are haemodynamically stable? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results: We found 26 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions: In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: amiodarone, antithrombotic treatment before cardioversion, atenolol, bisoprolol, carvedilol, digoxin, diltiazem, direct current cardioversion, flecainide, metoprolol, nebivolol, propafenone, sotalol, timolol, and verapamil.

心房颤动(急性发作)。
简介:急性心房颤动是最近发作的快速、不规则和混乱的心房活动。急性房颤的各种定义已在文献中使用,但为了本综述的目的,我们纳入了房颤可能在7天前发生的研究。急性心房颤动的危险因素包括年龄增长、心血管疾病、酒精、糖尿病和肺部疾病。急性心房颤动增加中风和心力衰竭的风险。超过50%的人在24至48小时内病情自行消退;然而,许多人需要干预来控制心率或恢复窦性心律。方法和结果:我们进行了一项系统回顾,旨在回答以下临床问题:对于血流动力学稳定的新发房颤患者(7天内),干预措施对预防栓塞、转换为窦性心律和控制心率的影响是什么?我们检索了截至2014年4月的Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库(临床证据综述定期更新;请查看我们的网站获取最新版本的评论)。我们纳入了来自相关组织的危害警报,如美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和英国药品和保健产品监管局(MHRA)。结果:我们发现26项研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们对干预措施的证据质量进行了GRADE评价。结论:在这篇系统综述中,我们介绍了以下干预措施的有效性和安全性:胺碘酮、转复前抗血栓治疗、阿替洛尔、比索洛尔、卡维地洛尔、地高辛、地尔硫卓、直流电转复、氟卡奈德、美托洛尔、奈比洛尔、普罗帕酮、索他洛尔、替马洛尔和维拉帕米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信