On Consistency of Self- and Proxy-reported Regular Smoking Initiation Age.

Julia N Soulakova, Brianna C Bright, Lisa J Crockett
{"title":"On Consistency of Self- and Proxy-reported Regular Smoking Initiation Age.","authors":"Julia N Soulakova,&nbsp;Brianna C Bright,&nbsp;Lisa J Crockett","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early onset of smoking is associated with heavier tobacco consumption and longer smoking careers. Consequently, obtaining accurate estimates of early smoking is a priority. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of proxy reports of the age of smoking initiation, and specifically to explore whether there are differences in the consistency of proxy-reported and self-reported smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history of participants were reported by self-and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. Sequential multiple-testing methods were used to assess significance of the differences in reported prevalence of consistent reports among specific sub-populations defined by age, gender and survey administration mode. Results indicated that self-reports are more reliable (more consistent over time) than proxy reports or mixed reports that include self-report at one time point and proxy reports at another. The rate of perfect agreement was also highest for self-reports. The impact of respondent type on the consistency of reports also depended on the target subjects' age and the survey administration mode (phone or in-person).</p>","PeriodicalId":90627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse and alcoholism","volume":"1 1","pages":"1001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233135/pdf/nihms641046.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early onset of smoking is associated with heavier tobacco consumption and longer smoking careers. Consequently, obtaining accurate estimates of early smoking is a priority. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of proxy reports of the age of smoking initiation, and specifically to explore whether there are differences in the consistency of proxy-reported and self-reported smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history of participants were reported by self-and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. Sequential multiple-testing methods were used to assess significance of the differences in reported prevalence of consistent reports among specific sub-populations defined by age, gender and survey administration mode. Results indicated that self-reports are more reliable (more consistent over time) than proxy reports or mixed reports that include self-report at one time point and proxy reports at another. The rate of perfect agreement was also highest for self-reports. The impact of respondent type on the consistency of reports also depended on the target subjects' age and the survey administration mode (phone or in-person).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自我报告与代理报告开始吸烟年龄的一致性研究。
早开始吸烟与大量烟草消费和较长的吸烟生涯有关。因此,获得早期吸烟的准确估计是当务之急。本研究的目的是检验开始吸烟年龄的代理报告的效用,特别是探讨代理报告和自我报告的吸烟行为的一致性是否存在差异。数据来自2002-2003年当前人口调查的烟草使用补充,其中参与者的当前吸烟行为和吸烟史由自我和代理受访者两次报告,间隔一年。采用顺序多重检验方法评估按年龄、性别和调查管理模式定义的特定亚人群中一致报告的患病率差异的显著性。结果表明,自我报告比代理报告或混合报告更可靠(随着时间的推移更一致),混合报告包括一个时间点的自我报告和另一个时间点的代理报告。自我报告的完全一致率也是最高的。调查对象类型对报告一致性的影响还取决于目标对象的年龄和调查管理模式(电话或面对面)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信