Predicting Birth-Related Levator Ani Tear Severity in Primiparous Women: Evaluating Maternal Recovery from Labor and Delivery (EMRLD Study).

Lisa Kane Low, Ruth Zielinski, Yebin Tao, Andrzej Galecki, Catherine J Brandon, Janis M Miller
{"title":"Predicting Birth-Related Levator Ani Tear Severity in Primiparous Women: Evaluating Maternal Recovery from Labor and Delivery (EMRLD Study).","authors":"Lisa Kane Low,&nbsp;Ruth Zielinski,&nbsp;Yebin Tao,&nbsp;Andrzej Galecki,&nbsp;Catherine J Brandon,&nbsp;Janis M Miller","doi":"10.4236/ojog.2014.46043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine which maternal characteristics or birth events independently predict severity of levator ani muscle (LA) tears at first vaginal birth in a longitudinal/observational investigation in a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Ninety primiparas with at least one at risk for LA tear inclusion factor at vaginal birth: maternal age ≥ 33 years, second stage ≥ 150 minutes, macrosomia, instrumented delivery, and/or anal sphincter laceration were studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was obtained early postpartum (mean ± sd 48.9 ± 21.6 days) to identify LA tear. Severity of LA muscle fiber loss was graded on an ordinal scale of: \"0\" as no loss, \"1\" as <50% unilateral loss, \"2\" as ≥50% unilateral or <50% bilateral loss, and \"3\" as ≥50% bilateral loss. Data were analyzed using proportional odds modeling. Inclusion factors were explored as predictors of LA tear severity and at analysis episiotomy, time spent actively pushing, epidural, and oxytocin were also considered. The main outcome measures of interest included grading of severity of LA muscle fiber loss on an ordinal scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respective counts/percentages of women within each 0 thru 3 ordered category of LA tear severity were: \"0\" = 58(64%), \"1\" = 9(10%), \"2\" = 15(17%), and \"3\" = 8(9%). Estimates and 95% CI for significant demographic or obstetric univariate predictors of LA tear severity level were age, OR 1.093 (CI 1.012 - 1.180), <i>p</i> = 0.023; and time spent in active pushing, OR 1.089 (CI 1.005 - 1.180), <i>p</i> = 0.038. The other factors considered were not significant. There were too few women with forceps deliveries to analyze. CONCLUSION: In our enriched sample of primiparous women, 26% showed a significant LA tear. Maternal age and time spent actively pushing independently predict LA tear severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19676,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"4 6","pages":"266-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219623/pdf/nihms-590680.pdf","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2014.46043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Objective: To determine which maternal characteristics or birth events independently predict severity of levator ani muscle (LA) tears at first vaginal birth in a longitudinal/observational investigation in a tertiary care hospital.

Sample: Ninety primiparas with at least one at risk for LA tear inclusion factor at vaginal birth: maternal age ≥ 33 years, second stage ≥ 150 minutes, macrosomia, instrumented delivery, and/or anal sphincter laceration were studied.

Methods: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was obtained early postpartum (mean ± sd 48.9 ± 21.6 days) to identify LA tear. Severity of LA muscle fiber loss was graded on an ordinal scale of: "0" as no loss, "1" as <50% unilateral loss, "2" as ≥50% unilateral or <50% bilateral loss, and "3" as ≥50% bilateral loss. Data were analyzed using proportional odds modeling. Inclusion factors were explored as predictors of LA tear severity and at analysis episiotomy, time spent actively pushing, epidural, and oxytocin were also considered. The main outcome measures of interest included grading of severity of LA muscle fiber loss on an ordinal scale.

Results: Respective counts/percentages of women within each 0 thru 3 ordered category of LA tear severity were: "0" = 58(64%), "1" = 9(10%), "2" = 15(17%), and "3" = 8(9%). Estimates and 95% CI for significant demographic or obstetric univariate predictors of LA tear severity level were age, OR 1.093 (CI 1.012 - 1.180), p = 0.023; and time spent in active pushing, OR 1.089 (CI 1.005 - 1.180), p = 0.038. The other factors considered were not significant. There were too few women with forceps deliveries to analyze. CONCLUSION: In our enriched sample of primiparous women, 26% showed a significant LA tear. Maternal age and time spent actively pushing independently predict LA tear severity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测初产妇与出生相关的提肛肌撕裂严重程度:评估分娩和分娩后的产妇恢复(EMRLD研究)。
目的:在三级医院进行纵向/观察性调查,以确定哪些产妇特征或分娩事件独立预测首次阴道分娩时提肛肌(LA)撕裂的严重程度。样本:研究了90例阴道分娩时至少有1例LA撕裂包涵因子风险的初产妇:产妇年龄≥33岁,第二阶段≥150分钟,巨大儿,器械分娩和/或肛门括约肌撕裂伤。方法:产后早期(平均±sd 48.9±21.6天)进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查,确定LA撕裂。LA肌纤维损失的严重程度按顺序分级:“0”为无损失,“1”为结果:在LA撕裂严重程度的每个0到3排序类别中,女性的各自计数/百分比为:“0”= 58(64%),“1”= 9(10%),“2”= 15(17%),“3”= 8(9%)。LA撕裂严重程度的重要人口统计学或产科单变量预测因素的估计和95% CI为年龄,or 1.093 (CI 1.012 - 1.180), p = 0.023;和主动推压时间,OR 1.089 (CI 1.005 - 1.180), p = 0.038。其他考虑的因素并不重要。使用产钳分娩的妇女太少,无法进行分析。结论:在我们丰富的初产妇样本中,26%的人表现出明显的LA撕裂。产妇年龄和积极分娩时间独立预测LA撕裂严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信