Posterior Cervicothoracic Instrumentation: Testing the Clinical Efficacy of Tapered Rods (Dual-Diameter Rods).

Q Medicine
Arvind G Kulkarni, Abhilash N Dhruv, Anupreet J Bassi
{"title":"Posterior Cervicothoracic Instrumentation: Testing the Clinical Efficacy of Tapered Rods (Dual-Diameter Rods).","authors":"Arvind G Kulkarni,&nbsp;Abhilash N Dhruv,&nbsp;Anupreet J Bassi","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the clinical efficacy of tapered rods in posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The cervicothoracic spine is a junctional area with complex biomechanics. A variety of disorders affect this region, rendering it unstable. Numerous posterior constructs have been evaluated by in vitro biomechanical studies. There are no data available on the clinical efficacy of a screw-rod system utilizing tapered (dual-diameter) rods. This is the first study analyzing the efficacy of this system in clinical scenarios in the short term.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with cervicothoracic junctional pathologies undergoing surgical treatment by posterior instrumentation utilizing tapered rods, between April 2007 and April 2012 were included in the study. The tapered rod tapers from a diameter of 5.5-3.5 mm to accommodate thoracic pedicle screws and lateral mass screws/pedicle screws of cervical spine, respectively. The cases were periodically followed up. Postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 14 cases, 11 males and 3 females. The etiology was tuberculosis in 7 cases, neoplasm in 5, and 1 each of trauma and deformity. Three patients required combined anterior and posterior surgeries and remaining 10 were managed by posterior-only procedures. The average follow-up was 28 months. Three patients died (surgically unrelated reasons) and 1 was lost to follow-up. Excluding 2 patients with neoplastic and traumatic etiologies, patients with neurological deficit had significant improvement. One patient had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak which was recognized and corrected subsequently. No biomechanical failure occurred in any of the patients. No intraoperative complications were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that tapered rods are an excellent and a viable option to connect screws to stabilize cervicothoracic junction in the short term. This study complements the biomechanical studies previously reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 10","pages":"382-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000133","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Study design: Prospective study.

Objective: To study the clinical efficacy of tapered rods in posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation.

Summary of background data: The cervicothoracic spine is a junctional area with complex biomechanics. A variety of disorders affect this region, rendering it unstable. Numerous posterior constructs have been evaluated by in vitro biomechanical studies. There are no data available on the clinical efficacy of a screw-rod system utilizing tapered (dual-diameter) rods. This is the first study analyzing the efficacy of this system in clinical scenarios in the short term.

Materials and methods: All consecutive patients with cervicothoracic junctional pathologies undergoing surgical treatment by posterior instrumentation utilizing tapered rods, between April 2007 and April 2012 were included in the study. The tapered rod tapers from a diameter of 5.5-3.5 mm to accommodate thoracic pedicle screws and lateral mass screws/pedicle screws of cervical spine, respectively. The cases were periodically followed up. Postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed.

Results: There were 14 cases, 11 males and 3 females. The etiology was tuberculosis in 7 cases, neoplasm in 5, and 1 each of trauma and deformity. Three patients required combined anterior and posterior surgeries and remaining 10 were managed by posterior-only procedures. The average follow-up was 28 months. Three patients died (surgically unrelated reasons) and 1 was lost to follow-up. Excluding 2 patients with neoplastic and traumatic etiologies, patients with neurological deficit had significant improvement. One patient had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak which was recognized and corrected subsequently. No biomechanical failure occurred in any of the patients. No intraoperative complications were noted.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that tapered rods are an excellent and a viable option to connect screws to stabilize cervicothoracic junction in the short term. This study complements the biomechanical studies previously reported.

后颈胸内固定:锥形棒(双径棒)的临床疗效测试。
研究设计:前瞻性研究。目的:探讨锥形棒在颈胸后路固定术中的临床效果。背景资料概述:颈胸椎是具有复杂生物力学的交界区。各种疾病影响着这个区域,使其不稳定。许多后路构造已经通过体外生物力学研究进行了评估。尚无关于使用锥形(双直径)棒的螺钉-棒系统的临床疗效的数据。这是第一个在短期内分析该系统临床效果的研究。材料和方法:2007年4月至2012年4月期间,所有连续接受后路锥形棒内固定手术治疗的颈胸交界病变患者纳入研究。锥形棒的直径为5.5-3.5 mm,分别用于胸椎椎弓根螺钉和颈椎侧块螺钉/椎弓根螺钉。对这些病例进行定期随访。分析术后x线片和计算机断层扫描。结果:14例,男11例,女3例。结核7例,肿瘤5例,外伤、畸形各1例。3例患者需要前后路联合手术,其余10例仅行后路手术。平均随访时间为28个月。3例死亡(与手术无关),1例失访。除2例肿瘤和外伤性病因外,神经功能缺损患者均有显著改善。1例患者术后出现脑脊液漏,经确认后予以纠正。所有患者均未发生生物力学失效。无术中并发症。结论:本研究表明锥形棒是短期内连接螺钉稳定颈胸关节的一种极好且可行的选择。这项研究补充了先前报道的生物力学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信