Correction factor for continuous monitoring of wood smoke fine particulate matter.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Marcy L McNamara, Curtis W Noonan, Tony J Ward
{"title":"Correction factor for continuous monitoring of wood smoke fine particulate matter.","authors":"Marcy L McNamara,&nbsp;Curtis W Noonan,&nbsp;Tony J Ward","doi":"10.4209/aaqr.2010.08.0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated a handful of instruments as Federal Reference or Federal Equivalency Methods (FRM and FEM, respectively) for the monitoring of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). More commonly used for indoor exposure assessment studies are optical scanning devices such as the DustTrak (TSI) due to the their portability and affordability. It is recommended by the manufacturer of these instruments that a \"correction factor\" be applied when assessing source-specific conditions. In this study, DustTraks were collocated with multiple samplers in various environments in an effort to establish an indoor, wood smoke-source specific correction factor. The DustTrak was found to report PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels on average 1.6 times higher than a filter based method in two indoor sampling programs. The DustTrak also reported indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations 1.7 times higher than a FRM sampler during a regional forest fire event. These real-world scenarios give a correction factor within a reasonable range of the results of a controlled laboratory experiment in which DustTraks reported PM<sub>2.5</sub> approximately 2 times higher than a FEM. Our indoor wood smoke-specific correction factor of 1.65 will allow for DustTraks to be confidently used in quantifying PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures within indoor environments predominantly impacted by wood smoke.</p>","PeriodicalId":7402,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","volume":"11 3","pages":"315-322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214921/pdf/nihms344195.pdf","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.08.0072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated a handful of instruments as Federal Reference or Federal Equivalency Methods (FRM and FEM, respectively) for the monitoring of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). More commonly used for indoor exposure assessment studies are optical scanning devices such as the DustTrak (TSI) due to the their portability and affordability. It is recommended by the manufacturer of these instruments that a "correction factor" be applied when assessing source-specific conditions. In this study, DustTraks were collocated with multiple samplers in various environments in an effort to establish an indoor, wood smoke-source specific correction factor. The DustTrak was found to report PM2.5 levels on average 1.6 times higher than a filter based method in two indoor sampling programs. The DustTrak also reported indoor PM2.5 concentrations 1.7 times higher than a FRM sampler during a regional forest fire event. These real-world scenarios give a correction factor within a reasonable range of the results of a controlled laboratory experiment in which DustTraks reported PM2.5 approximately 2 times higher than a FEM. Our indoor wood smoke-specific correction factor of 1.65 will allow for DustTraks to be confidently used in quantifying PM2.5 exposures within indoor environments predominantly impacted by wood smoke.

连续监测木烟细颗粒物的校正系数。
美国环境保护署(EPA)指定了一些工具作为监测细颗粒物(PM2.5)的联邦参考方法或联邦等效方法(FRM和FEM)。由于其便携性和可负担性,更常用于室内暴露评估研究的是光学扫描设备,如DustTrak (TSI)。这些仪器的制造商建议在评估特定源条件时应用“校正因子”。在本研究中,DustTraks与多个采样器在不同环境中配置,以建立室内木材烟源特定校正因子。在两个室内采样项目中,DustTrak报告的PM2.5水平平均比基于过滤器的方法高1.6倍。DustTrak还报告说,在一次地区森林火灾事件中,室内PM2.5浓度比FRM采样器高1.7倍。这些真实世界的场景给出了一个合理范围内的校正因子,在一个受控的实验室实验中,DustTraks报告的PM2.5大约是FEM的2倍。我们的室内木材烟雾特定校正系数为1.65,这将使DustTraks能够自信地用于量化主要受木材烟雾影响的室内环境中的PM2.5暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Aerosol and Air Quality Research ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The international journal of Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) covers all aspects of aerosol science and technology, atmospheric science and air quality related issues. It encompasses a multi-disciplinary field, including: - Aerosol, air quality, atmospheric chemistry and global change; - Air toxics (hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs)) - Sources, control, transport and fate, human exposure; - Nanoparticle and nanotechnology; - Sources, combustion, thermal decomposition, emission, properties, behavior, formation, transport, deposition, measurement and analysis; - Effects on the environments; - Air quality and human health; - Bioaerosols; - Indoor air quality; - Energy and air pollution; - Pollution control technologies; - Invention and improvement of sampling instruments and technologies; - Optical/radiative properties and remote sensing; - Carbon dioxide emission, capture, storage and utilization; novel methods for the reduction of carbon dioxide emission; - Other topics related to aerosol and air quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信