Reliability of a Scale Assessing Depressed Mood in the Context of Sleep.

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology Pub Date : 2013-03-01 DOI:10.4473/TPM20.1.1

Brandy M Roane, Ronald Seifer, Katherine M Sharkey, Eliza Van Reen, Tamara L Y Bond, Tifenn Raffray, Mary A Carskadon

{"title":"Reliability of a Scale Assessing Depressed Mood in the Context of Sleep.","authors":"Brandy M Roane, Ronald Seifer, Katherine M Sharkey, Eliza Van Reen, Tamara L Y Bond, Tifenn Raffray, Mary A Carskadon","doi":"10.4473/TPM20.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study assessed the reliability of Kandel & Davies mood scale with and without sleep-related items. 178 Brown University first-year students (mean age=18.1 years; 108 females) completed online biweekly surveys after weeks 2, 6, 8, and 10 and on 2 consecutive days after weeks 4 and 12 of their first semester. The scale was examined as a 1) full 6-item scale, 2) 5-item scale excluding the sleep item, and 3) 4-item scale excluding the sleep and tired items. Intraclass correlations (ICC) values for consecutive-day assessments and 6 biweekly surveys were similar and not a function of the weeks evaluated. Total-item correlations and inter-measure correlations with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depressed Mood Scale (CES-D) supported the removal of the sleep-related items from the 6-item scale. These analyses confirm the reliability of the original Kandel and Davies depressed mood scale as well as without the sleep-related items.</p>","PeriodicalId":46266,"journal":{"name":"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206909/pdf/nihms598445.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM20.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

The current study assessed the reliability of Kandel & Davies mood scale with and without sleep-related items. 178 Brown University first-year students (mean age=18.1 years; 108 females) completed online biweekly surveys after weeks 2, 6, 8, and 10 and on 2 consecutive days after weeks 4 and 12 of their first semester. The scale was examined as a 1) full 6-item scale, 2) 5-item scale excluding the sleep item, and 3) 4-item scale excluding the sleep and tired items. Intraclass correlations (ICC) values for consecutive-day assessments and 6 biweekly surveys were similar and not a function of the weeks evaluated. Total-item correlations and inter-measure correlations with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depressed Mood Scale (CES-D) supported the removal of the sleep-related items from the 6-item scale. These analyses confirm the reliability of the original Kandel and Davies depressed mood scale as well as without the sleep-related items.

查看原文本刊更多论文

睡眠环境下抑郁情绪评估量表的可靠性。

目前的研究评估了坎德尔和戴维斯情绪量表的可靠性，包括和不包括与睡眠有关的项目。布朗大学一年级学生178名(平均年龄18.1岁;108名女性)在第2周、第6周、第8周和第10周以及第一学期第4周和第12周后连续两天完成了每两周一次的在线调查。量表采用1)完整的6项量表，2)不含睡眠项的5项量表，3)不含睡眠和疲劳项的4项量表。连续一天评估和6个双周调查的类内相关性(ICC)值相似，不是评估周的函数。与流行病学研究中心抑郁情绪量表(CES-D)的总项目相关性和测量间相关性支持从6项量表中删除与睡眠相关的项目。这些分析证实了最初的坎德尔和戴维斯抑郁情绪量表的可靠性，以及没有睡眠相关项目的可靠性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

14.30%

发文量