Comparison of epidemiological methods for estimation of hepatitis B incidence and residual risk for blood donors in southern Brazil.

Journal of transfusion Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-05-10 DOI:10.4061/2011/985383
Emil Kupek, Andrea Petry
{"title":"Comparison of epidemiological methods for estimation of hepatitis B incidence and residual risk for blood donors in southern Brazil.","authors":"Emil Kupek,&nbsp;Andrea Petry","doi":"10.4061/2011/985383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and Objective. The objective of this work was to compare three methods for estimating hepatitis B virus (HBV) incidence and residual risk. Methods. Computerized blood donor records in southern Brazil were examined for the period 2004-2006. The methods for estimating HBV incidence included stand-alone HBsAg, HBsAg yield method, and an extension of the latter which added recent anti-HBc seroconversions as incident HBV cases. Results. HBV incidences for the above methods were 9.91, 20.09, and 22.93 per 100000 repeat donors, respectively. In the same order, corresponding residual risks were 1 : 62482, 1 : 30821, and 1 : 47559, respectively. First-time donors had 52 higher HBV incidence compared to repeat donors. Conclusion. Although the three methods compared produced overlapping 95% confidence intervals, their variation was considerably lower for the method which included recent anti-HBc seroconversions. First-time donors are primary cause for concern regarding HBV transmission via blood transfusion in southern Brazil. </p>","PeriodicalId":90634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transfusion","volume":"2011 ","pages":"985383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4157395/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/985383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background and Objective. The objective of this work was to compare three methods for estimating hepatitis B virus (HBV) incidence and residual risk. Methods. Computerized blood donor records in southern Brazil were examined for the period 2004-2006. The methods for estimating HBV incidence included stand-alone HBsAg, HBsAg yield method, and an extension of the latter which added recent anti-HBc seroconversions as incident HBV cases. Results. HBV incidences for the above methods were 9.91, 20.09, and 22.93 per 100000 repeat donors, respectively. In the same order, corresponding residual risks were 1 : 62482, 1 : 30821, and 1 : 47559, respectively. First-time donors had 52 higher HBV incidence compared to repeat donors. Conclusion. Although the three methods compared produced overlapping 95% confidence intervals, their variation was considerably lower for the method which included recent anti-HBc seroconversions. First-time donors are primary cause for concern regarding HBV transmission via blood transfusion in southern Brazil.

巴西南部献血者乙型肝炎发病率和剩余风险估计的流行病学方法比较
背景和目的。这项工作的目的是比较三种估计乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)发病率和剩余风险的方法。方法。对2004-2006年期间巴西南部的计算机化献血者记录进行了检查。估计HBV发病率的方法包括单独的HBsAg法、HBsAg产率法以及后者的扩展,后者将最近的抗- hbc血清转化作为事件HBV病例。结果。上述方法的HBV感染率分别为9.91 / 10万、20.09 / 10万、22.93 / 10万。在相同的顺序下,对应的剩余风险分别为1:6 2482、1:30 821、1:47 559。与重复献血者相比,首次献血者的HBV发病率高出52%。结论。虽然比较的三种方法产生重叠的95%置信区间,但对于包括最近的抗- hbc血清转换的方法,它们的差异要低得多。在巴西南部,首次献血者是HBV通过输血传播的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信