Risk management analysis of air ambulance blood product administration in combat operations.

Nicole Powell-Dunford, Jose F Quesada, Robert F Malsby, Victoria Chou, Robert T Gerhardt, Kirby R Gross, Stacy A Shackelford
{"title":"Risk management analysis of air ambulance blood product administration in combat operations.","authors":"Nicole Powell-Dunford,&nbsp;Jose F Quesada,&nbsp;Robert F Malsby,&nbsp;Victoria Chou,&nbsp;Robert T Gerhardt,&nbsp;Kirby R Gross,&nbsp;Stacy A Shackelford","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.3851.2014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between June-October 2012, 61 flight-medic-directed transfusions took place aboard U.S. Army Medical Evacuation (medevac) helicopters in Afghanistan. This represents the initial experience for pre-hospital blood product transfusion by U.S. Army flight medics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of clinical records, operating guidelines, after-action reviews, decision and information briefs, bimonthly medical conferences, and medevac-related medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A successful program was administered at 10 locations across Afghanistan. Adherence to protocol transfusion indications was 97%. There were 61 casualties who were transfused without any known instance of adverse reaction or local blood product wastage. Shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) improved significantly en route, with a median shock index of 1.6 (IQR 1.2-2.0) pre-transfusion and 1.1 (IQR 1.0-1.5) post-transfusion (P < 0.0001). Blood resupply, training, and clinical procedures were standardized across each of the 10 areas of medevac operations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Potential risks of medical complications, reverse propaganda, adherence to protocol, and diversion and/or wastage of limited resources were important considerations in the development of the pilot program. Aviation-specific risk mitigation strategies were important to ensure mission success in terms of wastage prevention, standardized operations at multiple locations, and prevention of adverse clinical outcomes. Consideration of aviation risk mitigation strategies may help enable other helicopter emergency medical systems to develop remote pre-hospital transfusion capability. This pilot program provides preliminary evidence that blood product administration by medevac is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1130-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.3851.2014","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3851.2014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: Between June-October 2012, 61 flight-medic-directed transfusions took place aboard U.S. Army Medical Evacuation (medevac) helicopters in Afghanistan. This represents the initial experience for pre-hospital blood product transfusion by U.S. Army flight medics.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of clinical records, operating guidelines, after-action reviews, decision and information briefs, bimonthly medical conferences, and medevac-related medical records.

Results: A successful program was administered at 10 locations across Afghanistan. Adherence to protocol transfusion indications was 97%. There were 61 casualties who were transfused without any known instance of adverse reaction or local blood product wastage. Shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) improved significantly en route, with a median shock index of 1.6 (IQR 1.2-2.0) pre-transfusion and 1.1 (IQR 1.0-1.5) post-transfusion (P < 0.0001). Blood resupply, training, and clinical procedures were standardized across each of the 10 areas of medevac operations.

Discussion: Potential risks of medical complications, reverse propaganda, adherence to protocol, and diversion and/or wastage of limited resources were important considerations in the development of the pilot program. Aviation-specific risk mitigation strategies were important to ensure mission success in terms of wastage prevention, standardized operations at multiple locations, and prevention of adverse clinical outcomes. Consideration of aviation risk mitigation strategies may help enable other helicopter emergency medical systems to develop remote pre-hospital transfusion capability. This pilot program provides preliminary evidence that blood product administration by medevac is safe.

作战行动中空中救护血制品管理的风险管理分析。
背景:2012年6月至10月期间,在阿富汗美军医疗后送直升机上进行了61次飞行医疗指导输血。这是美国陆军飞行医务人员院前输血的初步经验。方法:我们对临床记录、操作指南、事后评价、决策和信息简报、双月医学会议和医疗后送相关病历进行回顾性分析。结果:一个成功的项目在阿富汗的10个地点实施。对输血指征的依从性为97%。有61名伤员输血时没有任何已知的不良反应或局部血液制品浪费。休克指数(心率/收缩压)在输血过程中显著改善,输血前休克指数中位数为1.6 (IQR 1.2-2.0),输血后休克指数中位数为1.1 (IQR 1.0-1.5) (P < 0.0001)。血液补给、训练和临床程序在10个医疗后送行动区都标准化了。讨论:医疗并发症的潜在风险、反向宣传、对方案的遵守、有限资源的转移和/或浪费是制定试点方案时的重要考虑因素。针对航空的风险缓解战略对于确保特派团在预防浪费、多地点标准化作业和预防不良临床结果方面取得成功至关重要。考虑航空风险缓解战略可能有助于其他直升机紧急医疗系统发展远程院前输血能力。这一试点项目提供了初步证据,证明由医疗后送机给药血液制品是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信