Open arterial revascularization of the critically ischemic foot using arterial homograft.

Joseph J Naoum, Jean Bismuth, Hosam F El-Sayed, Mark G Davies, Eric K Peden, Alan B Lumsden
{"title":"Open arterial revascularization of the critically ischemic foot using arterial homograft.","authors":"Joseph J Naoum,&nbsp;Jean Bismuth,&nbsp;Hosam F El-Sayed,&nbsp;Mark G Davies,&nbsp;Eric K Peden,&nbsp;Alan B Lumsden","doi":"10.12816/0006212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Revascularization alternatives for patients with critical limb ischemia and without adequate autogenous vein remain challenging. We reviewed our experience with the use of arterial homograft as a conduit for limb salvage in patients with limb ischemia and active lower extremity infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent open arterial revascularization of the lower extremity with cryopreserved femoral artery homograft for the treatment of symptomatic critical limb ischemia (i.e., foot ulceration, infection, or gangrene) during an 18-month period was performed. Relevant clinical variables and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Clinical success was defined as limb salvage for one year, patency of the reconstruction, and wound healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients (5 men; average age 71 +/- 83 years, range 51-87 years) were treated during this study period. Treatment indications included 10 (77%) foot ulcerations, 2 (15%) critically ischemic limbs without ulceration, and 1 (8%) infected polytetrafluoroethylene bypass graft with acute occlusion and limb ischemia. A femoral below-the-knee popliteal bypass was performed in 4 (1%), femoral to anterior tibial artery in 4 (31%), femoral to posterior tibial artery in 3 (23%), and femoral to peroneal artery in 2 (15%). All 13 limbs were preserved. Minor amputations were performed in 6 patients, 2 underwent toe amputations and 4 patients had a trans-metatarsal amputation. The cumulative patency rate at 6, 9, and 18 months was 92.3%, 70.3%, and 58.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open arterial revascularization with arterial femoral homograft is an acceptable treatment method in patients with critical limb ischemia and active infection in whom autogenous vein is not available or the use of a synthetic conduit is not possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":430072,"journal":{"name":"Le Journal médical libanais. The Lebanese medical journal","volume":"62 3","pages":"125-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Le Journal médical libanais. The Lebanese medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0006212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Revascularization alternatives for patients with critical limb ischemia and without adequate autogenous vein remain challenging. We reviewed our experience with the use of arterial homograft as a conduit for limb salvage in patients with limb ischemia and active lower extremity infections.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent open arterial revascularization of the lower extremity with cryopreserved femoral artery homograft for the treatment of symptomatic critical limb ischemia (i.e., foot ulceration, infection, or gangrene) during an 18-month period was performed. Relevant clinical variables and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Clinical success was defined as limb salvage for one year, patency of the reconstruction, and wound healing.

Results: Thirteen patients (5 men; average age 71 +/- 83 years, range 51-87 years) were treated during this study period. Treatment indications included 10 (77%) foot ulcerations, 2 (15%) critically ischemic limbs without ulceration, and 1 (8%) infected polytetrafluoroethylene bypass graft with acute occlusion and limb ischemia. A femoral below-the-knee popliteal bypass was performed in 4 (1%), femoral to anterior tibial artery in 4 (31%), femoral to posterior tibial artery in 3 (23%), and femoral to peroneal artery in 2 (15%). All 13 limbs were preserved. Minor amputations were performed in 6 patients, 2 underwent toe amputations and 4 patients had a trans-metatarsal amputation. The cumulative patency rate at 6, 9, and 18 months was 92.3%, 70.3%, and 58.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: Open arterial revascularization with arterial femoral homograft is an acceptable treatment method in patients with critical limb ischemia and active infection in whom autogenous vein is not available or the use of a synthetic conduit is not possible.

同种动脉移植治疗严重缺血足部的开放动脉重建术。
背景:对于肢体严重缺血且没有足够自体静脉的患者,血运重建的选择仍然具有挑战性。我们回顾了我们在肢体缺血和活动性下肢感染患者中使用动脉同种移植物作为保肢导管的经验。方法:回顾性分析在18个月的时间里,采用冷冻股动脉同种移植物行下肢开放动脉血运重建术治疗症状性肢体缺血(即足部溃疡、感染或坏疽)的患者。分析相关临床变量及治疗结果。临床成功的定义是肢体保留一年,重建通畅,伤口愈合。结果:13例患者(男性5例;平均年龄71±83岁(范围51 ~ 87岁)。治疗指征包括足部溃疡10例(77%),无溃疡的重度缺血肢体2例(15%),急性闭塞伴肢体缺血感染聚四氟乙烯搭桥1例(8%)。股骨膝下腘动脉搭桥4例(1%),股至胫骨前动脉搭桥4例(31%),股至胫骨后动脉搭桥3例(23%),股至腓骨动脉搭桥2例(15%)。13条四肢全部保存完好。6例患者行小截肢,2例行足趾截肢,4例行经跖骨截肢。6个月、9个月和18个月的累计通畅率分别为92.3%、70.3%和58.6%。结论:对于无法获得自体静脉或无法使用人工血管的肢体缺血和活动性感染患者,开放动脉血管重建术联合股动脉同种异体移植物是一种可接受的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信