Sputum bacteriology and antibiotic sensitivity patterns of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adult patients in Nigeria: a 5-year multicentre retrospective study.

Michael O Iroezindu, Emmanuel I Chima, Godsent C Isiguzo, Godwin C Mbata, Cajetan C Onyedum, Kenneth I Onyedibe, Leo E Okoli
{"title":"Sputum bacteriology and antibiotic sensitivity patterns of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adult patients in Nigeria: a 5-year multicentre retrospective study.","authors":"Michael O Iroezindu,&nbsp;Emmanuel I Chima,&nbsp;Godsent C Isiguzo,&nbsp;Godwin C Mbata,&nbsp;Cajetan C Onyedum,&nbsp;Kenneth I Onyedibe,&nbsp;Leo E Okoli","doi":"10.3109/00365548.2014.954263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A clear knowledge of the pathogens responsible for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a given region and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns is necessary for optimal treatment. We determined the common bacterial pathogens causing CAP in Nigeria and further reviewed their antibiotic senstivity patterns with a view to providing recommendations to improve antibiotic management of CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case notes of all adult patients who were 18 years or more admitted to four major tertiary hospitals in South East Nigeria with a diagnosis of CAP between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively studied. To be eligible, patients were required to have sputum culture and sensitivity results available. Socio-demographic, clinical, pre-admission and in-hospital treatment data were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 400 patients with a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of CAP, 232 fulfilled the study criteria; 122 (52.6%) were women and the mean age was 50.6 ± 18.8 years. Aetiological agents were identified from sputum in 189 (81.5%) patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 90, 47.6%) was the most frequent isolate followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 62, 32.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 24, 12.7%) and Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 13, 6.9%). The pathogens were most sensitive to levofloxacin (77%), ceftazidime (75.5%) and ofloxacin (55.8%). The susceptibility of the isolates to antibiotics most frequently presecribed for empirical therapy was low (co-amoxiclav, 47.6%; ciprofloxacin, 45.9% and ceftriaxone, 47.6%) and this was associated with higher mortality and/or longer duration of hospital stay in survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strep. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae were the most common causes of CAP. The pathogens were most sensitive to levofloxacin and ceftazidime. We suggest that these antibiotics should increasingly be considered as superior options for empirical treatment of CAP in Nigeria.</p>","PeriodicalId":21541,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.954263","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.954263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: A clear knowledge of the pathogens responsible for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a given region and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns is necessary for optimal treatment. We determined the common bacterial pathogens causing CAP in Nigeria and further reviewed their antibiotic senstivity patterns with a view to providing recommendations to improve antibiotic management of CAP.

Methods: Case notes of all adult patients who were 18 years or more admitted to four major tertiary hospitals in South East Nigeria with a diagnosis of CAP between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively studied. To be eligible, patients were required to have sputum culture and sensitivity results available. Socio-demographic, clinical, pre-admission and in-hospital treatment data were also obtained.

Results: Of 400 patients with a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of CAP, 232 fulfilled the study criteria; 122 (52.6%) were women and the mean age was 50.6 ± 18.8 years. Aetiological agents were identified from sputum in 189 (81.5%) patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 90, 47.6%) was the most frequent isolate followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 62, 32.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 24, 12.7%) and Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 13, 6.9%). The pathogens were most sensitive to levofloxacin (77%), ceftazidime (75.5%) and ofloxacin (55.8%). The susceptibility of the isolates to antibiotics most frequently presecribed for empirical therapy was low (co-amoxiclav, 47.6%; ciprofloxacin, 45.9% and ceftriaxone, 47.6%) and this was associated with higher mortality and/or longer duration of hospital stay in survivors.

Conclusion: Strep. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae were the most common causes of CAP. The pathogens were most sensitive to levofloxacin and ceftazidime. We suggest that these antibiotics should increasingly be considered as superior options for empirical treatment of CAP in Nigeria.

尼日利亚住院成人患者社区获得性肺炎的痰细菌学和抗生素敏感性模式:一项5年多中心回顾性研究
背景:明确了解特定地区导致社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的病原体及其抗生素敏感性模式对于最佳治疗是必要的。我们确定了尼日利亚常见的导致CAP的细菌病原体,并进一步回顾了它们的抗生素敏感性模式,以期为改善CAP的抗生素管理提供建议。方法:回顾性研究2008年至2012年期间尼日利亚东南部四家主要三级医院确诊为CAP的所有18岁及以上成年患者的病例记录。为了符合条件,患者需要有痰培养和敏感性结果。还获得了社会人口统计学、临床、入院前和住院治疗数据。结果:400例经放射学诊断为CAP的患者中,232例符合研究标准;女性122例(52.6%),平均年龄50.6±18.8岁。189例(81.5%)患者痰中检出病原。肺炎链球菌(90株,47.6%)是最常见的分离菌,其次是肺炎克雷伯菌(62株,32.8%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(24株,12.7%)和化脓性链球菌(13株,6.9%)。病原菌对左氧氟沙星(77%)、头孢他啶(75.5%)和氧氟沙星(55.8%)最为敏感。分离株对经验治疗常用抗生素的敏感性较低(共阿莫昔拉夫,47.6%;环丙沙星,45.9%和头孢曲松,47.6%),这与幸存者更高的死亡率和/或更长的住院时间有关。结论:喉炎的症状。肺炎菌和肺炎克雷伯菌是最常见的致病菌,致病菌对左氧氟沙星和头孢他啶最敏感。我们建议,这些抗生素应越来越多地被视为尼日利亚CAP经验性治疗的优越选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信