Comparison between deep learning architectures for the 1 km, 10/15-min estimation of downward shortwave radiation from AHI and ABI

IF 11.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ruohan Li , Dongdong Wang , Shunlin Liang
{"title":"Comparison between deep learning architectures for the 1 km, 10/15-min estimation of downward shortwave radiation from AHI and ABI","authors":"Ruohan Li ,&nbsp;Dongdong Wang ,&nbsp;Shunlin Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2023.113697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The retrieval of downward shortwave radiation (DSR) with high spatiotemporal resolution and short latency is critical. It is the fundamental driving force of surface energy, carbon, and hydrological circulations, and a key energy source for photovoltaic electricity. However, existing methods face significant challenges owing to cloud heterogeneity and their reliance on other satellite-derived products, which hinder the retrieval of accurate and timely DSR with high spatiotemporal resolution. In addition to the spectral features used in traditional approaches, deep learning (DL) can incorporate the spatial and temporal features of satellite data. This study developed and compared three DL methods, namely the <span><math><mtext>DenseNet</mtext></math></span>, the bidirectional gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (<span><math><msub><mtext>BiGRU</mtext><mi>nor</mi></msub></math></span>), and the convolutional neural network with gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (<span><math><msub><mtext>CNNGRU</mtext><mi>nor</mi></msub></math></span>). These methods were used to estimate DSR at 1 km and 10/15 min resolutions directly from top-of-atmosphere reflectance over the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard Himawari-8 and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) onboard GOES-16 coverage, achieving high accuracies. The instantaneous root mean square error (RMSE) and relative RMSE for the three models were 68.4 (16.1%), 69.4 (16.3%), and 67.1 (15.7%) <span><math><mi>W</mi><mo>/</mo><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>, respectively, which are lower than the baseline machine learning method, the multilayer perceptron model (MLP), with RMSE at 76.8 <span><math><mi>W</mi><mo>/</mo><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span> (18.0%). Hourly accuracies for the three DL methods were 58.6 (14.1%), 57.8 (14.0%), and 57.3 (13.8%) <span><math><mi>W</mi><mo>/</mo><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>, which are within the DSR RMSEs that we estimated for existing datasets of the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) (88.8 <span><math><mi>W</mi><mo>/</mo><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>, 21.4%) and GeoNEX (77.8 <span><math><mi>W</mi><mo>/</mo><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>, 18.8%). The study illustrates that DL models that incorporate temporal information can eliminate the need for surface albedo as an input, which is crucial for timely monitoring and nowcasting of DSR. Incorporating spatial information can enhance retrieval accuracy in overcast conditions, and incorporating infrared bands can further improve the accuracy of DSR estimation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"295 ","pages":"Article 113697"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425723002481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The retrieval of downward shortwave radiation (DSR) with high spatiotemporal resolution and short latency is critical. It is the fundamental driving force of surface energy, carbon, and hydrological circulations, and a key energy source for photovoltaic electricity. However, existing methods face significant challenges owing to cloud heterogeneity and their reliance on other satellite-derived products, which hinder the retrieval of accurate and timely DSR with high spatiotemporal resolution. In addition to the spectral features used in traditional approaches, deep learning (DL) can incorporate the spatial and temporal features of satellite data. This study developed and compared three DL methods, namely the DenseNet, the bidirectional gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (BiGRUnor), and the convolutional neural network with gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (CNNGRUnor). These methods were used to estimate DSR at 1 km and 10/15 min resolutions directly from top-of-atmosphere reflectance over the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard Himawari-8 and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) onboard GOES-16 coverage, achieving high accuracies. The instantaneous root mean square error (RMSE) and relative RMSE for the three models were 68.4 (16.1%), 69.4 (16.3%), and 67.1 (15.7%) W/m2, respectively, which are lower than the baseline machine learning method, the multilayer perceptron model (MLP), with RMSE at 76.8 W/m2 (18.0%). Hourly accuracies for the three DL methods were 58.6 (14.1%), 57.8 (14.0%), and 57.3 (13.8%) W/m2, which are within the DSR RMSEs that we estimated for existing datasets of the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) (88.8 W/m2, 21.4%) and GeoNEX (77.8 W/m2, 18.8%). The study illustrates that DL models that incorporate temporal information can eliminate the need for surface albedo as an input, which is crucial for timely monitoring and nowcasting of DSR. Incorporating spatial information can enhance retrieval accuracy in overcast conditions, and incorporating infrared bands can further improve the accuracy of DSR estimation.

深度学习架构对AHI和ABI 1 km, 10/15 min下行短波辐射估计的比较
高时空分辨率、短时延的下向短波辐射(DSR)反演是关键。它是地表能、碳循环和水循环的根本动力,是光伏发电的关键能源。然而,由于云的异质性和对其他卫星衍生产品的依赖,现有方法面临着巨大的挑战,这阻碍了准确、及时、高时空分辨率的DSR检索。除了传统方法中使用的光谱特征外,深度学习(DL)还可以结合卫星数据的空间和时间特征。本研究开发并比较了DenseNet、不含表面反照率的双向门控循环单元(BiGRUnor)和不含表面反照率的双向门控循环单元(CNNGRUnor)三种深度学习方法。利用这些方法直接从Himawari-8搭载的高级Himawari成像仪(AHI)和GOES-16搭载的高级基线成像仪(ABI)覆盖范围的大气顶反射率估算1 km和10/15 min分辨率下的DSR,获得了较高的精度。三种模型的瞬时均方根误差(RMSE)和相对RMSE分别为68.4(16.1%)、69.4(16.3%)和67.1 (15.7%)W/m2,均低于基线机器学习方法多层感知器模型(MLP)的RMSE为76.8 W/m2(18.0%)。三种DL方法的每小时精度分别为58.6(14.1%)、57.8(14.0%)和57.3 (13.8%)W/m2,均在我们对地球辐射能量系统(CERES) (88.8 W/m2, 21.4%)和GeoNEX (77.8 W/m2, 18.8%)现有数据集估计的DSR均方根范围内。研究表明,纳入时间信息的深度降水模式可以消除地表反照率作为输入的需要,这对于DSR的及时监测和临近预报至关重要。结合空间信息可提高阴天条件下的反演精度,结合红外波段可进一步提高DSR估计的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信