{"title":"Commentary on: \"Sterile Seroma Resulting from Multilevel XLIF Procedure as Possible Adverse Effect of Prophylactic Vancomycin Powder: A Case Report\".","authors":"Scott L Parker, Clinton J Devin","doi":"10.1055/s-0034-1386759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is the second most common health care – associated infection in the United States, second only to urinary tract infections, and resulting in an estimated 8,205 deaths in 2002 alone. 1 Furthermore, SSIs have been shown to result in a prolongation of hospital stay by 9.7 days and increase treatment cost by $20,842 per admission. 2 Assuch, signi fi cant attention has been focused on means of reducing SSIs and their associated morbidity and excess health care costs. Gram-positive microorganisms are the most common cause of SSI following spine surgery. 3 The use of prophylactic intrawound vancomycin powder has recently become a more common practice due to its ease of application, low cost, and ability to achieve high local con-centrations with low systemic levels. 4,5 A recent meta-analy-sis found that vancomycin powder was associated with a signi fi cant reduction in SSI (odds ratio: 0.19, 95% con fi dence interval: 0.09 – 0.38). 6 Furthermore, cost analyses on patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures have demonstrated that the use of vancomycin powder was associated with a cost savings of $438,165 per 100 spinal fusions performed. 7 As with any new technology, medication, or technique, adverse events and/or sequelae will inevitably surface following generalized practice implementation. Well-described adverse drug reactions to systemic intravenous vancomycin use include red","PeriodicalId":89675,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","volume":"5 2","pages":"134-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0034-1386759","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1386759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is the second most common health care – associated infection in the United States, second only to urinary tract infections, and resulting in an estimated 8,205 deaths in 2002 alone. 1 Furthermore, SSIs have been shown to result in a prolongation of hospital stay by 9.7 days and increase treatment cost by $20,842 per admission. 2 Assuch, signi fi cant attention has been focused on means of reducing SSIs and their associated morbidity and excess health care costs. Gram-positive microorganisms are the most common cause of SSI following spine surgery. 3 The use of prophylactic intrawound vancomycin powder has recently become a more common practice due to its ease of application, low cost, and ability to achieve high local con-centrations with low systemic levels. 4,5 A recent meta-analy-sis found that vancomycin powder was associated with a signi fi cant reduction in SSI (odds ratio: 0.19, 95% con fi dence interval: 0.09 – 0.38). 6 Furthermore, cost analyses on patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures have demonstrated that the use of vancomycin powder was associated with a cost savings of $438,165 per 100 spinal fusions performed. 7 As with any new technology, medication, or technique, adverse events and/or sequelae will inevitably surface following generalized practice implementation. Well-described adverse drug reactions to systemic intravenous vancomycin use include red