{"title":"Partha banerjea.","authors":"Sabina Dosani","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.114.046979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dr Partha Banerjea is a consultant adolescent psychiatrist, running a high-risk, high-impact adolescent service at the Maudsley Hospital in South London. He is lead clinician for Southwark Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, and visiting lecturer at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He has a keen interest in how to train future psychiatrists and interdisciplinary ideas such as the interface between psychiatry and the arts. He studied as an undergraduate at the University of Birmingham, then undertook postgraduate studies in New Zealand before returning to the Maudsley and St George's to complete his training. What is your idea of a perfect mental health service? Free at point of access, mindful of differential engagement patterns (race, ethnicity and class all play a part here), flexible, resourced financially with treatments that work, backed by research in the real world that utilises cross-disciplinary ideas as a way of embedding implementation, creative, and free from both central government whimsy and sanctimonious therapists making no difference in the lives of the people they respectfully serve and see. Which psychiatrist, living or dead, do you most admire? Easily it would be Professor David Goldberg, who ran the adolescent service in Wandsworth while I was training. He is a psychiatrist who demonstrated immense generosity of spirit combined with a polymath's ability to effortlessly synthesise academic data not only from psychiatry and numerous psychological therapies, but also from anthropology, sociology and politics, and he brought it alive often in the room with a patient, to their benefit. To this day it is unlikely ever to be surpassed. What do you consider to be your greatest achievements? Teaching systemic theory through the films of Kurosawa, seeing the excitement in a trainee when a new idea sparks like a rewind in a dancehall, talking Miles Davies with colleagues and adolescents alike. What has been your most controversial idea? That class may be a greater factor in alignments of perception than race and that if services wanted creativity they need to tolerate uncertainty and discomfort. What frustrates you most about working in psychiatry? Government ministers introducing policy in stark contrast to available evidence, while simultaneously forgetting that they are here to serve the people. They forget that politics is showbiz for ugly people, and since most political careers end in failure, the price for their particular hubris should not be paid for by the everyman on the street. …","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.114.046979","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.046979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dr Partha Banerjea is a consultant adolescent psychiatrist, running a high-risk, high-impact adolescent service at the Maudsley Hospital in South London. He is lead clinician for Southwark Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, and visiting lecturer at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He has a keen interest in how to train future psychiatrists and interdisciplinary ideas such as the interface between psychiatry and the arts. He studied as an undergraduate at the University of Birmingham, then undertook postgraduate studies in New Zealand before returning to the Maudsley and St George's to complete his training. What is your idea of a perfect mental health service? Free at point of access, mindful of differential engagement patterns (race, ethnicity and class all play a part here), flexible, resourced financially with treatments that work, backed by research in the real world that utilises cross-disciplinary ideas as a way of embedding implementation, creative, and free from both central government whimsy and sanctimonious therapists making no difference in the lives of the people they respectfully serve and see. Which psychiatrist, living or dead, do you most admire? Easily it would be Professor David Goldberg, who ran the adolescent service in Wandsworth while I was training. He is a psychiatrist who demonstrated immense generosity of spirit combined with a polymath's ability to effortlessly synthesise academic data not only from psychiatry and numerous psychological therapies, but also from anthropology, sociology and politics, and he brought it alive often in the room with a patient, to their benefit. To this day it is unlikely ever to be surpassed. What do you consider to be your greatest achievements? Teaching systemic theory through the films of Kurosawa, seeing the excitement in a trainee when a new idea sparks like a rewind in a dancehall, talking Miles Davies with colleagues and adolescents alike. What has been your most controversial idea? That class may be a greater factor in alignments of perception than race and that if services wanted creativity they need to tolerate uncertainty and discomfort. What frustrates you most about working in psychiatry? Government ministers introducing policy in stark contrast to available evidence, while simultaneously forgetting that they are here to serve the people. They forget that politics is showbiz for ugly people, and since most political careers end in failure, the price for their particular hubris should not be paid for by the everyman on the street. …