Unheard voices: outcomes of tertiary care for treatment-refractory psychosis.

S Neil Sarkar, Derek K Tracy, Maria-Jesus Mateos Fernandez, Natasza Nalesnik, Gurbinder Dhillon, Juliana Onwumere, Anne-Marye Prins, Karen Schepman, Tracy Collier, Thomas P White, Anita Patel, Fiona Gaughran, Sukhwinder S Shergill
{"title":"Unheard voices: outcomes of tertiary care for treatment-refractory psychosis.","authors":"S Neil Sarkar, Derek K Tracy, Maria-Jesus Mateos Fernandez, Natasza Nalesnik, Gurbinder Dhillon, Juliana Onwumere, Anne-Marye Prins, Karen Schepman, Tracy Collier, Thomas P White, Anita Patel, Fiona Gaughran, Sukhwinder S Shergill","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.112.042598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims and method In up to a quarter of patients, schizophrenia is resistant to standard treatments. We undertook a naturalistic study of 153 patients treated in the tertiary referral in-patient unit of the National Psychosis Service based at the Maudsley Hospital in London. A retrospective analysis of symptoms on admission and discharge was undertaken using the OPCRIT tool, along with preliminary economic modelling of potential costs related to changes in accommodation. Results In-patient treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all symptom categories in patients already identified as having schizophrenia refractory to standard secondary care. The preliminary cost analysis showed net savings to referring authorities due to changes from pre- to post-discharge accommodation. Clinical implications Despite the enormous clinical, personal and societal burden of refractory psychotic illnesses, there is insufficient information on the outcomes of specialised tertiary-level care. Our pilot data support its utility in all domains measured. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 2","pages":"71-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.112.042598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and method In up to a quarter of patients, schizophrenia is resistant to standard treatments. We undertook a naturalistic study of 153 patients treated in the tertiary referral in-patient unit of the National Psychosis Service based at the Maudsley Hospital in London. A retrospective analysis of symptoms on admission and discharge was undertaken using the OPCRIT tool, along with preliminary economic modelling of potential costs related to changes in accommodation. Results In-patient treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all symptom categories in patients already identified as having schizophrenia refractory to standard secondary care. The preliminary cost analysis showed net savings to referring authorities due to changes from pre- to post-discharge accommodation. Clinical implications Despite the enormous clinical, personal and societal burden of refractory psychotic illnesses, there is insufficient information on the outcomes of specialised tertiary-level care. Our pilot data support its utility in all domains measured.

Abstract Image

听不见的声音:难治性精神病三级护理的结果。
目的和方法在多达四分之一的精神分裂症患者中,标准治疗方法是无效的。我们对153名在伦敦莫兹利医院国家精神病服务三级转诊住院病房接受治疗的患者进行了自然研究。使用OPCRIT工具对入院和出院时的症状进行了回顾性分析,并对与住宿变化相关的潜在成本进行了初步经济建模。结果:住院治疗显示,在标准二级治疗难治性精神分裂症患者中,所有症状类别均有统计学上的显著改善。初步成本分析显示,由于从出院前到出院后住宿的改变,转诊当局节省了净费用。临床意义尽管难治性精神疾病给临床、个人和社会带来了巨大的负担,但关于专科三级护理结果的信息并不充分。我们的试点数据支持其在所有测量领域的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信