{"title":"The Role of <i>Only</i> in Contrasts in and out of Context.","authors":"Katy Carlson","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three self-paced reading experiments explored the processing of \"only\" and its interaction with context. In isolated sentences, the focus particle \"only\" predicts an upcoming contrast. Ambiguous replacive sentences (e.g., \"The curator embarrassed the gallery owner in public, not the artist\") with \"only\" on the subject or object showed faster reading of the contrast phrase (\"not the artist\") than without it. The position of \"only\" also influenced the phrase's meaning; despite a bias toward object contrasts, subject \"only\" increased subject interpretations. If preceding context provides another reason for the focus particle, it no longer predicts an upcoming contrast. In biasing contexts including indirect questions, there was no facilitation when \"only\" marked the argument which answered the question, while \"only\" on the other argument slowed processing. Both \"only\" and context influenced interpretation. The results show that focus particles and questions can each influence processing of an upcoming contrast on- and off-line.</p>","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"50 4","pages":"249-275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Three self-paced reading experiments explored the processing of "only" and its interaction with context. In isolated sentences, the focus particle "only" predicts an upcoming contrast. Ambiguous replacive sentences (e.g., "The curator embarrassed the gallery owner in public, not the artist") with "only" on the subject or object showed faster reading of the contrast phrase ("not the artist") than without it. The position of "only" also influenced the phrase's meaning; despite a bias toward object contrasts, subject "only" increased subject interpretations. If preceding context provides another reason for the focus particle, it no longer predicts an upcoming contrast. In biasing contexts including indirect questions, there was no facilitation when "only" marked the argument which answered the question, while "only" on the other argument slowed processing. Both "only" and context influenced interpretation. The results show that focus particles and questions can each influence processing of an upcoming contrast on- and off-line.
三个自定节奏阅读实验探讨了“only”的加工及其与语境的相互作用。在孤立的句子中,焦点词“only”预示着即将到来的对比。用主题或对象上的“only”代替模棱两可的句子(例如,“策展人在公共场合使画廊老板难堪,而不是艺术家”),比不加“only”的对比短语(“not The artist”)的阅读速度更快。“only”的位置也影响了这个短语的意思;尽管偏向于客体对比,但主体“只”增加了主体的解释。如果前面的上下文为焦点粒子提供了另一个原因,它就不再预测即将到来的对比。在有偏见的语境中,包括间接问题,当“only”标记回答问题的论点时,没有促进作用,而“only”标记另一个论点时,则会减慢处理速度。“only”和语境都会影响解释。结果表明,焦点粒子和问题都可以影响即将到来的对比处理。
期刊介绍:
Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.