Clinical evaluation of rigid gas permeable contact lenses and visual outcome after repaired corneal laceration.

Bin Zheng, Lijun Shen, Maria K Walker, Zongduan Zhang, Jingwei Zheng, Xiangjun She, Jing Zhou, Zhaoxia Xu, Yan Chen
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of rigid gas permeable contact lenses and visual outcome after repaired corneal laceration.","authors":"Bin Zheng,&nbsp;Lijun Shen,&nbsp;Maria K Walker,&nbsp;Zongduan Zhang,&nbsp;Jingwei Zheng,&nbsp;Xiangjun She,&nbsp;Jing Zhou,&nbsp;Zhaoxia Xu,&nbsp;Yan Chen","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical value of rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCLs) in patients with traumatic corneal scarring and address implications of primary corneal repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen subjects with a history of corneal laceration were fit with RGPCLs. Scar locations were divided into two zones; each patient was examined using Pentacam. Entering data included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spectacle-corrected visual acuity (SVA), time between injury and RGPCL fitting, location and size of scar, and amount of corneal astigmatism. Follow-up data included RGPCL visual acuity (RGPCLVA), RGPCL-related complications, and dropout characteristics. Visual acuity values were converted to logMAR for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No serious complications occurred. The average time between suture removal and RGPCL fitting was 5.7±5.5 months. Average corneal astigmatism was -3.44±2.09 diopters. One subject had developed corneal ectasia. RGPCLVA was more than 0.1 in three subjects: one experienced primary corneal repair complications, and two subjects (<10 years) developed amblyopia. In both zones, the difference in RGPCLVA outcome between zone I and zone II was not statistically significant (F=0.060, P=0.809). The difference between SVA in zones I and II was found to be statistically significant (F=6.131, P=0.026), as were the differences between SVA and RGPCLVA (F=8.598, P=0.010). The scar size had no significant influence on RGPCLVA, SVA, or UCVA. Four participants (22.2%) were successfully fit. Dropout characteristics included ocular discomfort, inconvenience, parental apprehension, and low motivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rigid gas permeable contact lens is an ideal method for evaluating visual potential in patients with traumatic corneal astigmatism. Pentacam examinations of those patients with poor RGPCLVA can help an ophthalmologist find and understand existing problems in suture techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":502139,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens","volume":" ","pages":"34-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000061","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCLs) in patients with traumatic corneal scarring and address implications of primary corneal repair.

Methods: Eighteen subjects with a history of corneal laceration were fit with RGPCLs. Scar locations were divided into two zones; each patient was examined using Pentacam. Entering data included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spectacle-corrected visual acuity (SVA), time between injury and RGPCL fitting, location and size of scar, and amount of corneal astigmatism. Follow-up data included RGPCL visual acuity (RGPCLVA), RGPCL-related complications, and dropout characteristics. Visual acuity values were converted to logMAR for analysis.

Results: No serious complications occurred. The average time between suture removal and RGPCL fitting was 5.7±5.5 months. Average corneal astigmatism was -3.44±2.09 diopters. One subject had developed corneal ectasia. RGPCLVA was more than 0.1 in three subjects: one experienced primary corneal repair complications, and two subjects (<10 years) developed amblyopia. In both zones, the difference in RGPCLVA outcome between zone I and zone II was not statistically significant (F=0.060, P=0.809). The difference between SVA in zones I and II was found to be statistically significant (F=6.131, P=0.026), as were the differences between SVA and RGPCLVA (F=8.598, P=0.010). The scar size had no significant influence on RGPCLVA, SVA, or UCVA. Four participants (22.2%) were successfully fit. Dropout characteristics included ocular discomfort, inconvenience, parental apprehension, and low motivation.

Conclusions: Rigid gas permeable contact lens is an ideal method for evaluating visual potential in patients with traumatic corneal astigmatism. Pentacam examinations of those patients with poor RGPCLVA can help an ophthalmologist find and understand existing problems in suture techniques.

硬质透气性隐形眼镜与角膜裂伤修复后视力的临床评价。
目的:评价硬质透气性隐形眼镜(RGPCLs)在外伤性角膜瘢痕患者中的临床应用价值,探讨角膜初级修复的意义。方法:18例有角膜撕裂史的患者选择RGPCLs。疤痕位置被划分为两个区域;每位患者使用Pentacam进行检查。输入的数据包括未矫正视力(UCVA)、眼镜矫正视力(SVA)、受伤至RGPCL配合器的时间、疤痕的位置和大小、角膜散光程度。随访数据包括RGPCL视力(RGPCLVA)、RGPCL相关并发症和辍学特征。视敏度值转换为logMAR进行分析。结果:无严重并发症发生。从拆线到RGPCL安装平均时间为5.7±5.5个月。平均角膜散光为-3.44±2.09屈光度。一名受试者出现角膜扩张。1例有原发性角膜修复并发症,2例有RGPCLVA > 0.1。结论:硬质透气性隐形眼镜是评估外伤性角膜散光患者视电位的理想方法。对RGPCLVA差的患者进行Pentacam检查可以帮助眼科医生发现和了解缝合技术中存在的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书