Myringoplasty with and without Cortical Mastoidectomy in Treatment of Non-cholesteatomatous Chronic Otitis Media: A Comparative Study.

Clinical medicine insights. Ear, nose and throat Pub Date : 2014-08-12 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.4137/CMENT.S17980
Hazem Mohammed Abdel Tawab, Fadi Mahmoud Gharib, Tareq M Algarf, Louay S ElSharkawy
{"title":"Myringoplasty with and without Cortical Mastoidectomy in Treatment of Non-cholesteatomatous Chronic Otitis Media: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Hazem Mohammed Abdel Tawab,&nbsp;Fadi Mahmoud Gharib,&nbsp;Tareq M Algarf,&nbsp;Louay S ElSharkawy","doi":"10.4137/CMENT.S17980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcome and success of repair of uncomplicated tympanic membrane perforations with myringoplasty alone and when combined with mastoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study where 40 patients with non-cholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) were recruited during the period of June 2013 to December 2013 from the outpatient clinic of Otorhinolaryngology department, Faculty of medicine, Cairo University. Patients were managed medically and after dryness of their perforations they were operated upon. Twenty patients underwent simple myringoplasty alone and 20 patients underwent myringoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy. Underlay technique with temporalis fascia was done for all patients. Follow-up period was at least 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hearing improvement was comparable in both groups. There was no significant difference in graft uptake between the myringoplasty alone group (70%) and cortical mastoidectomy group (80%) (P = 0.7). There was no significant difference in ear dryness between the myringoplasty alone group (75%) and cortical mastoidectomy group (90%) (P = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mastoidectomy performed in non-cholesteatomatous CSOM in this study gives no statistically significant benefit over simple myringoplasty as regards graft success rate and dryness of the middle ear with comparable hearing outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":89906,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine insights. Ear, nose and throat","volume":"7 ","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/CMENT.S17980","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine insights. Ear, nose and throat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/CMENT.S17980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcome and success of repair of uncomplicated tympanic membrane perforations with myringoplasty alone and when combined with mastoidectomy.

Methods: A prospective study where 40 patients with non-cholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) were recruited during the period of June 2013 to December 2013 from the outpatient clinic of Otorhinolaryngology department, Faculty of medicine, Cairo University. Patients were managed medically and after dryness of their perforations they were operated upon. Twenty patients underwent simple myringoplasty alone and 20 patients underwent myringoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy. Underlay technique with temporalis fascia was done for all patients. Follow-up period was at least 3 months.

Results: Hearing improvement was comparable in both groups. There was no significant difference in graft uptake between the myringoplasty alone group (70%) and cortical mastoidectomy group (80%) (P = 0.7). There was no significant difference in ear dryness between the myringoplasty alone group (75%) and cortical mastoidectomy group (90%) (P = 0.4).

Conclusion: Mastoidectomy performed in non-cholesteatomatous CSOM in this study gives no statistically significant benefit over simple myringoplasty as regards graft success rate and dryness of the middle ear with comparable hearing outcome.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

鼓膜成形术加与不加皮质乳突切除术治疗非胆脂瘤性慢性中耳炎的比较研究。
目的:比较单纯鼓膜成形术与乳突切除术联合修补无并发症鼓膜穿孔的效果和成功率。方法:选取2013年6月至2013年12月在开罗大学医学院耳鼻喉科门诊就诊的40例非胆脂瘤性慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)患者进行前瞻性研究。对患者进行医疗管理,在穿孔干燥后进行手术。20例患者行单纯鼓膜成形术,20例患者行鼓膜成形术加皮质乳突切除术。所有患者均行颞筋膜下垫技术。随访期至少3个月。结果:两组患者的听力改善具有可比性。单纯鼓膜成形术组(70%)与皮质乳突切除术组(80%)的移植物摄取无显著差异(P = 0.7)。单纯鼓膜成形术组(75%)与皮质乳突切除术组(90%)的耳干性差异无统计学意义(P = 0.4)。结论:在本研究中,非胆脂瘤性CSOM的乳突切除术在移植物成功率和中耳干燥度方面与单纯的鼓膜成形术相比没有统计学上的显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书