Associations of census-tract poverty with subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage of disease at diagnosis in the United States.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Cancer Epidemiology Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-08-03 DOI:10.1155/2014/823484
Kevin A Henry, Recinda L Sherman, Kaila McDonald, Christopher J Johnson, Ge Lin, Antoinette M Stroup, Francis P Boscoe
{"title":"Associations of census-tract poverty with subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage of disease at diagnosis in the United States.","authors":"Kevin A Henry, Recinda L Sherman, Kaila McDonald, Christopher J Johnson, Ge Lin, Antoinette M Stroup, Francis P Boscoe","doi":"10.1155/2014/823484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. It remains unclear whether neighborhood poverty contributes to differences in subsite-specific colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. We examined associations between census-tract poverty and CRC incidence and stage by anatomic subsite and race/ethnicity. Methods. CRC cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2009 from 15 states and Los Angeles County (N = 278,097) were assigned to 1 of 4 groups based on census-tract poverty. Age-adjusted and stage-specific CRC incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by subsite (proximal, distal, and rectum), sex, race/ethnicity, and poverty. Results. Compared to the lowest poverty areas, CRC IRs were significantly higher in the most impoverished areas for men (IRR = 1.14 95% CI 1.12-1.17) and women (IRR = 1.06 95% CI 1.05-1.08). Rate differences between high and low poverty were strongest for distal colon (male IRR = 1.24 95% CI 1.20-1.28; female IRR = 1.14 95% CI 1.10-1.18) and weakest for proximal colon. These rate differences were significant for non-Hispanic whites and blacks and for Asian/Pacific Islander men. Inverse associations between poverty and IRs of all CRC and proximal colon were found for Hispanics. Late-to-early stage CRC IRRs increased monotonically with increasing poverty for all race/ethnicity groups. Conclusion. There are differences in subsite-specific CRC incidence by poverty, but associations were moderated by race/ethnicity. </p>","PeriodicalId":15366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/823484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. It remains unclear whether neighborhood poverty contributes to differences in subsite-specific colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. We examined associations between census-tract poverty and CRC incidence and stage by anatomic subsite and race/ethnicity. Methods. CRC cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2009 from 15 states and Los Angeles County (N = 278,097) were assigned to 1 of 4 groups based on census-tract poverty. Age-adjusted and stage-specific CRC incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by subsite (proximal, distal, and rectum), sex, race/ethnicity, and poverty. Results. Compared to the lowest poverty areas, CRC IRs were significantly higher in the most impoverished areas for men (IRR = 1.14 95% CI 1.12-1.17) and women (IRR = 1.06 95% CI 1.05-1.08). Rate differences between high and low poverty were strongest for distal colon (male IRR = 1.24 95% CI 1.20-1.28; female IRR = 1.14 95% CI 1.10-1.18) and weakest for proximal colon. These rate differences were significant for non-Hispanic whites and blacks and for Asian/Pacific Islander men. Inverse associations between poverty and IRs of all CRC and proximal colon were found for Hispanics. Late-to-early stage CRC IRRs increased monotonically with increasing poverty for all race/ethnicity groups. Conclusion. There are differences in subsite-specific CRC incidence by poverty, but associations were moderated by race/ethnicity.

Abstract Image

美国人口普查区贫困与特定地区结直肠癌发病率和诊断时疾病阶段的关系。
背景。邻里贫困是否会导致特定部位结直肠癌(CRC)发病率的差异,目前仍不清楚。我们按解剖学亚部位和种族/人种研究了人口普查区贫困与 CRC 发病率和分期之间的关系。研究方法将 15 个州和洛杉矶县 2005 年至 2009 年期间确诊的 CRC 病例(N = 278,097 例)根据人口普查区的贫困程度分为 4 组。计算经年龄调整和分期的 CRC 发病率 (IR) 和发病率比 (IRR)。分析按部位(近端、远端和直肠)、性别、种族/民族和贫困程度进行分层。结果显示与贫困程度最低的地区相比,最贫困地区的男性(IRR = 1.14 95% CI 1.12-1.17)和女性(IRR = 1.06 95% CI 1.05-1.08)CRC IRs 明显更高。远端结肠和近端结肠的贫困率差异最大(男性 IRR = 1.24 95% CI 1.20-1.28;女性 IRR = 1.14 95% CI 1.10-1.18),而近端结肠的差异最小。在非西班牙裔白人、黑人和亚裔/太平洋岛民男性中,这些比率差异显著。在西班牙裔中,贫困与所有 CRC 和近端结肠的 IR 之间存在反向关系。在所有种族/族裔群体中,晚期至早期 CRC IRR 随贫困程度的增加而单调增加。结论。不同贫困程度的亚特异性 CRC 发病率存在差异,但相关性受种族/人种的影响而有所缓和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, and clinical studies in all areas of cancer epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信