Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.

Charles O Stanier, Sang-Rin Lee
{"title":"Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.","authors":"Charles O Stanier,&nbsp;Sang-Rin Lee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predictive models of vehicular ultrafine particles less than 0.1 microm in diameter (UFPs*) and other urban pollutants with high spatial and temporal variation are useful and important in applications such as (1) decision support for infrastructure projects, emissions controls, and transportation-mode shifts; (2) the interpretation and enhancement of observations (e.g., source apportionment, extrapolation, interpolation, and gap-filling in space and time); and (3) the generation of spatially and temporally resolved exposure estimates where monitoring is unfeasible. The objective of the current study was to develop, test, and apply the Aerosol Screening Model (ASM), a new physically based vehicular UFP model for use in near-road environments. The ASM simulates hourly average outdoor concentrations of roadway-derived aerosols and gases. Its distinguishing features include user-specified spatial resolution; use of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) meteorologic model for winds estimates; use of a database of more than 100,000 road segments in the Los Angeles, California, region, including freeway ramps and local streets; and extensive testing against more than 9000 hours of observed particle concentrations at 11 sites. After initialization of air parcels at an upwind boundary, the model solves for vehicle emissions, dispersion, coagulation, and deposition using a Lagrangian modeling framework. The Lagrangian parcel of air is subdivided vertically (into 11 levels) and in the crosswind direction (into 3 parcels). It has overall dimensions of 10 m (downwind), 300 m (vertically), and 2.1 km (crosswind). The simulation is typically started 4 km upwind from the receptor, that is, the location at which the exposure is to be estimated. As parcels approach the receptor, depending on the user-specified resolution, step size is decreased, and crosswind resolution is enhanced through subdivision of parcels in the crosswind direction. Hourly concentrations and size distributions of aerosols were simulated for 11 sites in the Los Angeles area with large variations in proximal traffic and particle number concentrations (ranging from 6000 to 41,000/cm3). Observed data were from the 2005-2007 Harbor Community Monitoring Study (HCMS; Moore et al. 2009), in Long Beach, California, and the Coronary Health and Air Pollution Study (CHAPS; Delfino et al. 2008), in the Los Angeles area. Meteorologic fields were extracted from 1-km-resolution meteorologic simulations, and observed wind direction and speed were incorporated. Using on-road and tunnel measurements, size-resolved emission factors ranging from 1.4 x 10(15) to 16 x 10(15) particles/kg fuel were developed specifically for the ASM. Four separate size-resolved emissions were used. Traffic and emission factors were separately estimated for heavy-duty diesel and light-duty vehicles (LDV), and both cruise and acceleration emission factors were used. The light-duty cruise size-resolved number emission factor had a single prominent mode at 12 nm. The diesel cruise size-resolved number emission factor was bimodal, with a large mode at 16 nm and a secondary mode at around 100 nm. Emitted particles were assumed to be nonvolatile. Data on traffic activity came from a 2008 travel-demand model, supplemented by data on diurnal patterns. Simulated ambient number size distributions and number concentrations were compared to observations taking into account estimated losses from particle transmission efficiency in instrument inlet tubing. The skill of the model in predicting number concentrations and size distributions was mixed, with some promising prediction features and some other areas in need of substantial improvement. For long-term (-15-day) average concentrations, the variability from site to site could be modeled with a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.76. Model underprediction was more common than overprediction. The average of the absolute normalized bias was 0.30; in other words, long-term mean particle concentrations at each site were on average predicted to within 30% of the measured values. Observed 24-hour number concentrations were simulated to within a factor of 1.6 on 48% of days at HCMS sites and 81% at CHAPS sites, lower than the original design goal of 90%. Extensive evaluation of hourly concentrations, diurnal patterns, sizedistributions, and directional patterns was performed. At two sites with heavy freeway and heavy-duty-vehicle (HDV) influences and extensive size-resolved measurements, the ASM made significant errors in the diurnal pattern, concentration, and mode position of the aerosol size distribution. Observations indicated a shift in concentrations and size distributions corresponding to the afternoon development of offshore wind at the HCMS sites. The model did not reproduce the changes in particles associated with this wind shift and suffered from overprediction for particles of less than 15 nm and underprediction for particles of between 15 and 500 nm, raising doubt about the applicability of the HDV emission factors and the model's assumptions that particles were nonvolatile. The model's temporal prediction skill at individual monitoring sites was variable; the index of agreement (IOA) for hourly values at single sites ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. The model's ability to reproduce diurnal patterns in aerosol concentrations was site dependent; midday underprediction as well as underprediction for particle sizes greater than 15 nm were typical errors. Despite some problems in model skill, the number of time periods and locations evaluated as well as the extent of our qualitative and quantitative evaluations versus physical measurements well exceeded other published size-resolved modeling efforts. As a trial of a typical application, the sensitivity of the concentrations at each receptor site to LDV traffic, HDV traffic, and various road classes was evaluated. The sensitivity of overall particle numbers to all types of traffic ranged from 0.87 at the site with the heaviest traffic to 0.28 at the site with the lightest traffic, meaning that a 1% reduction in traffic could yield a reduction in particle number of 0.87% to 0.28%. Key conclusions and implications of the study are the following: 1. That variable-resolution (down to 10 m) modeling in a relatively simple framework is feasible and can support most of the applications mentioned above; 2. That model improvements will be required for some applications, especially in the areas of the HDV emission factor and the parameterization of meteorologic dispersion; 3. That particle loss from instrument transmission efficiency can be significant for particles smaller than 50 nm, and especially significant for particles smaller than 20 nm. In cases where loss corrections are not accounted for, or are inaccurate, this loss can cause disagreements in observation-model and observation-observation comparisons. 4. That LDV traffic exposures likely exceed HDV traffic exposures in some locations; 5. That variable step size and adaptive parcel width are critical to balancing computational efficiency and resolution; and 6. That the effects of roadways on air quality depend on both traffic volume and distance--in other words, low traffic volumes at close proximity need to be considered in health and planning studies just as much as do high traffic volumes at distances up to several kilometers. Future improvements to the model have been identified. They include improved emission factors; integration with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) model; nesting with three-dimensional (3D) Eulerian models such as the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model; increased emission dependence on acceleration, load, grade, and speed as well as evaporation and condensation of semivolatile aerosol species; and modeling of carbon dioxide (CO2) as an on-road and near-road dilution tracer. In addition, comparison with other statistically and physically based models would be highly beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":74687,"journal":{"name":"Research report (Health Effects Institute)","volume":" 179","pages":"3-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research report (Health Effects Institute)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictive models of vehicular ultrafine particles less than 0.1 microm in diameter (UFPs*) and other urban pollutants with high spatial and temporal variation are useful and important in applications such as (1) decision support for infrastructure projects, emissions controls, and transportation-mode shifts; (2) the interpretation and enhancement of observations (e.g., source apportionment, extrapolation, interpolation, and gap-filling in space and time); and (3) the generation of spatially and temporally resolved exposure estimates where monitoring is unfeasible. The objective of the current study was to develop, test, and apply the Aerosol Screening Model (ASM), a new physically based vehicular UFP model for use in near-road environments. The ASM simulates hourly average outdoor concentrations of roadway-derived aerosols and gases. Its distinguishing features include user-specified spatial resolution; use of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) meteorologic model for winds estimates; use of a database of more than 100,000 road segments in the Los Angeles, California, region, including freeway ramps and local streets; and extensive testing against more than 9000 hours of observed particle concentrations at 11 sites. After initialization of air parcels at an upwind boundary, the model solves for vehicle emissions, dispersion, coagulation, and deposition using a Lagrangian modeling framework. The Lagrangian parcel of air is subdivided vertically (into 11 levels) and in the crosswind direction (into 3 parcels). It has overall dimensions of 10 m (downwind), 300 m (vertically), and 2.1 km (crosswind). The simulation is typically started 4 km upwind from the receptor, that is, the location at which the exposure is to be estimated. As parcels approach the receptor, depending on the user-specified resolution, step size is decreased, and crosswind resolution is enhanced through subdivision of parcels in the crosswind direction. Hourly concentrations and size distributions of aerosols were simulated for 11 sites in the Los Angeles area with large variations in proximal traffic and particle number concentrations (ranging from 6000 to 41,000/cm3). Observed data were from the 2005-2007 Harbor Community Monitoring Study (HCMS; Moore et al. 2009), in Long Beach, California, and the Coronary Health and Air Pollution Study (CHAPS; Delfino et al. 2008), in the Los Angeles area. Meteorologic fields were extracted from 1-km-resolution meteorologic simulations, and observed wind direction and speed were incorporated. Using on-road and tunnel measurements, size-resolved emission factors ranging from 1.4 x 10(15) to 16 x 10(15) particles/kg fuel were developed specifically for the ASM. Four separate size-resolved emissions were used. Traffic and emission factors were separately estimated for heavy-duty diesel and light-duty vehicles (LDV), and both cruise and acceleration emission factors were used. The light-duty cruise size-resolved number emission factor had a single prominent mode at 12 nm. The diesel cruise size-resolved number emission factor was bimodal, with a large mode at 16 nm and a secondary mode at around 100 nm. Emitted particles were assumed to be nonvolatile. Data on traffic activity came from a 2008 travel-demand model, supplemented by data on diurnal patterns. Simulated ambient number size distributions and number concentrations were compared to observations taking into account estimated losses from particle transmission efficiency in instrument inlet tubing. The skill of the model in predicting number concentrations and size distributions was mixed, with some promising prediction features and some other areas in need of substantial improvement. For long-term (-15-day) average concentrations, the variability from site to site could be modeled with a coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.76. Model underprediction was more common than overprediction. The average of the absolute normalized bias was 0.30; in other words, long-term mean particle concentrations at each site were on average predicted to within 30% of the measured values. Observed 24-hour number concentrations were simulated to within a factor of 1.6 on 48% of days at HCMS sites and 81% at CHAPS sites, lower than the original design goal of 90%. Extensive evaluation of hourly concentrations, diurnal patterns, sizedistributions, and directional patterns was performed. At two sites with heavy freeway and heavy-duty-vehicle (HDV) influences and extensive size-resolved measurements, the ASM made significant errors in the diurnal pattern, concentration, and mode position of the aerosol size distribution. Observations indicated a shift in concentrations and size distributions corresponding to the afternoon development of offshore wind at the HCMS sites. The model did not reproduce the changes in particles associated with this wind shift and suffered from overprediction for particles of less than 15 nm and underprediction for particles of between 15 and 500 nm, raising doubt about the applicability of the HDV emission factors and the model's assumptions that particles were nonvolatile. The model's temporal prediction skill at individual monitoring sites was variable; the index of agreement (IOA) for hourly values at single sites ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. The model's ability to reproduce diurnal patterns in aerosol concentrations was site dependent; midday underprediction as well as underprediction for particle sizes greater than 15 nm were typical errors. Despite some problems in model skill, the number of time periods and locations evaluated as well as the extent of our qualitative and quantitative evaluations versus physical measurements well exceeded other published size-resolved modeling efforts. As a trial of a typical application, the sensitivity of the concentrations at each receptor site to LDV traffic, HDV traffic, and various road classes was evaluated. The sensitivity of overall particle numbers to all types of traffic ranged from 0.87 at the site with the heaviest traffic to 0.28 at the site with the lightest traffic, meaning that a 1% reduction in traffic could yield a reduction in particle number of 0.87% to 0.28%. Key conclusions and implications of the study are the following: 1. That variable-resolution (down to 10 m) modeling in a relatively simple framework is feasible and can support most of the applications mentioned above; 2. That model improvements will be required for some applications, especially in the areas of the HDV emission factor and the parameterization of meteorologic dispersion; 3. That particle loss from instrument transmission efficiency can be significant for particles smaller than 50 nm, and especially significant for particles smaller than 20 nm. In cases where loss corrections are not accounted for, or are inaccurate, this loss can cause disagreements in observation-model and observation-observation comparisons. 4. That LDV traffic exposures likely exceed HDV traffic exposures in some locations; 5. That variable step size and adaptive parcel width are critical to balancing computational efficiency and resolution; and 6. That the effects of roadways on air quality depend on both traffic volume and distance--in other words, low traffic volumes at close proximity need to be considered in health and planning studies just as much as do high traffic volumes at distances up to several kilometers. Future improvements to the model have been identified. They include improved emission factors; integration with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) model; nesting with three-dimensional (3D) Eulerian models such as the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model; increased emission dependence on acceleration, load, grade, and speed as well as evaporation and condensation of semivolatile aerosol species; and modeling of carbon dioxide (CO2) as an on-road and near-road dilution tracer. In addition, comparison with other statistically and physically based models would be highly beneficial.

粒径分辨城市气溶胶筛选模型的建立与应用。
车辆直径小于0.1微米的超细颗粒(ufp *)和其他具有高时空变化的城市污染物的预测模型在以下应用中是有用和重要的:(1)基础设施项目、排放控制和运输模式转换的决策支持;(2)观测数据的解释和增强(例如,源解析、外推、内插和空间和时间上的空白填补);(3)在监测不可行的情况下,生成空间和时间分辨的暴露估计。当前研究的目的是开发、测试和应用气溶胶筛选模型(ASM),这是一种新的基于物理的车辆UFP模型,适用于近路环境。ASM模拟道路气溶胶和气体每小时的室外平均浓度。其显著特征包括用户指定的空间分辨率;使用天气研究与预报(WRF)气象模式估计风力;使用加州洛杉矶地区超过10万个路段的数据库,包括高速公路坡道和当地街道;并对11个地点9000多小时观察到的颗粒浓度进行了广泛的测试。在逆风边界初始化空气包裹后,该模型使用拉格朗日建模框架求解车辆排放、分散、凝聚和沉积。拉格朗日空气包在垂直方向上被细分为11层,在侧风方向上被细分为3层。它的总尺寸为10米(下风),300米(垂直)和2.1公里(侧风)。模拟通常从受体逆风4公里处开始,即要估计暴露的位置。当包裹接近受体时,根据用户指定的分辨率,步长减小,并且通过在侧风方向细分包裹来增强侧风分辨率。模拟了洛杉矶地区11个站点气溶胶的小时浓度和大小分布,这些站点的近距离交通量和颗粒数浓度变化很大(范围从6000到41,000/cm3)。观测数据来自2005-2007年港口社区监测研究(HCMS;Moore et al. 2009),以及冠状动脉健康和空气污染研究(CHAPS;Delfino et al. 2008),在洛杉矶地区。从1公里分辨率的气象模拟中提取气象场,并结合观测到的风向和风速。通过对道路和隧道的测量,ASM专门开发了1.4 x 10(15)至16 x 10(15)颗粒/kg燃料的尺寸分辨排放因子。使用了四个独立的尺寸分辨排放物。分别估算了重型柴油车和轻型柴油车(LDV)的交通和排放因子,并同时使用了巡航和加速排放因子。轻型巡航尺寸分辨数发射因子在12 nm处有一个单一的突出模式。柴油巡航尺寸分解数排放因子为双峰模式,在16 nm处为大模式,在100 nm左右为次模式。发射的粒子被认为是非挥发性的。交通活动数据来自2008年的出行需求模型,并辅以日模式数据。将模拟的环境粒子大小分布和粒子浓度与观测值进行了比较,并考虑了仪器进气管中粒子传输效率造成的估计损失。该模型在预测数量浓度和大小分布方面的技能参差不齐,有些预测特征很有希望,有些地方需要大幅改进。对于长期(-15天)平均浓度,可以用决定系数(r2) 0.76对不同地点的变异性进行建模。模型预测不足比预测过高更为常见。绝对归一化偏差的平均值为0.30;换句话说,每个地点的长期平均颗粒浓度的预测平均在实测值的30%以内。在HCMS站点和CHAPS站点中,分别有48%和81%的站点将观察到的24小时数浓度模拟在1.6倍以内,低于90%的原始设计目标。进行了小时浓度、日模式、大小分布和方向模式的广泛评估。在高速公路和重型车辆(HDV)严重影响的两个站点和大量的尺寸分辨测量中,ASM在气溶胶尺寸分布的日格局、浓度和模态位置上存在显著误差。观测表明,在HCMS站点,浓度和大小分布的变化与下午海上风的发展相对应。 该模型没有重现与风向变化相关的颗粒变化,并且对小于15 nm的颗粒进行了高估,对15至500 nm之间的颗粒进行了低估,这使人们对HDV排放因子的适用性和模型关于颗粒非挥发性的假设产生了怀疑。模型在各个监测点的时间预测能力是可变的;单个站点每小时值的一致性指数(IOA)在0.30 ~ 0.56之间。该模式重现气溶胶浓度日模式的能力取决于地点;正午时的低预报以及大于15纳米的颗粒大小的低预报是典型的误差。尽管在建模技巧上存在一些问题,但是评估的时间段和地点的数量,以及我们的定性和定量评估相对于物理测量的程度,远远超过了其他已发表的尺寸分辨率建模工作。作为典型应用的试验,评估了每个受体位点的浓度对LDV交通、HDV交通和各种道路类别的敏感性。总体颗粒数对各类交通流量的敏感性从交通流量最大的站点的0.87到交通流量最轻的站点的0.28不等,即交通流量每减少1%,颗粒数就会减少0.87% ~ 0.28%。本研究的主要结论和启示如下:可变分辨率(低至10米)建模在一个相对简单的框架是可行的,可以支持上面提到的大多数应用;2. 某些应用将需要改进模式,特别是在高密度病毒排放因子和气象扩散参数化方面;3.对于小于50 nm的颗粒,仪器传输效率造成的颗粒损失可能是显著的,对于小于20 nm的颗粒尤其显著。在没有考虑损失修正或不准确的情况下,这种损失可能导致观测-模型和观测-观测比较中的分歧。4. 在某些地区,低密度交通暴露可能超过高密度交通暴露;5. 可变步长和自适应包宽是平衡计算效率和分辨率的关键;和6。道路对空气质量的影响取决于交通量和距离——换句话说,在健康和规划研究中需要考虑近距离的低交通量,就像在长达几公里的距离上考虑高交通量一样。已经确定了该模型未来的改进。它们包括改善排放系数;与美国环境保护署(EPA)机动车辆排放模拟器(MOVES)模型集成;嵌套三维欧拉模型,如社区多尺度空气质量(CMAQ)模型;排放对半挥发性气溶胶种类的加速、负荷、等级和速度以及蒸发和凝结的依赖性增加;以及二氧化碳(CO2)作为道路上和道路附近稀释示踪剂的建模。此外,与其他基于统计和物理的模型进行比较将非常有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信