Non-obligatory role of prostaglandin D2 receptor subtype 1 in rosacea: laropiprant in comparison to a placebo did not alleviate the symptoms of erythematoelangiectaic rosacea.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2015-02-01 Epub Date: 2014-09-04 DOI:10.1002/jcph.383
Rajesh Krishna, Ying Guo, Valerie Schulz, Evyan Cord-Cruz, Shanna Smith, Suzanne Hair, Walter K Nahm, Zoe D Draelos
{"title":"Non-obligatory role of prostaglandin D2 receptor subtype 1 in rosacea: laropiprant in comparison to a placebo did not alleviate the symptoms of erythematoelangiectaic rosacea.","authors":"Rajesh Krishna,&nbsp;Ying Guo,&nbsp;Valerie Schulz,&nbsp;Evyan Cord-Cruz,&nbsp;Shanna Smith,&nbsp;Suzanne Hair,&nbsp;Walter K Nahm,&nbsp;Zoe D Draelos","doi":"10.1002/jcph.383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea shares facial flushing features with those seen after niacin. This study was performed to test the hypothesis whether prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) receptor subtype 1 antagonist (laropiprant) will improve the symptoms of rosacea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of laropiprant 100 mg administered once daily for 4 weeks on the signs and symptoms of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Subjects received laropiprant 100 mg once-daily (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for 4 weeks. The primary pharmacodynamics endpoint was change in Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score from baseline to week 4. The patient self-assessment (PSA) was a secondary endpoint. Laropiprant was generally well tolerated in this study for the primary endpoint of change in CEA score from Baseline to Week 4, the least-squares mean of change from baseline to visit 4/week 4 was -3.7 and -3.4 for placebo and laropiprant (100 mg), respectively. The least-squares mean difference (placebo minus laropiprant) with 90% confidence interval of change in CEA score from baseline to visit 4/week 4 was estimated as -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0). For the secondary endpoint, the least-squares mean difference (placebo minus laropiprant) with 90% confidence interval of change from baseline to visit 4/week 4 was estimated as -0.7 (-7.7, 6.4) for PSA total score, -4.5 (-14.2, 5.3) for PSA emotion score, -1.3 (-7.8, 5.3) for PSA symptoms score, and 3.6 (-4.3, 11.4) for PSA functioning score. Laropiprant administered once daily for 4 weeks was generally well tolerated in this population of subjects with rosacea. However, there were no clinically meaningful changes in the primary endpoint of CEA given that the response to laropiprant could not be differentiated from that to placebo. There was also no clinically meaningful change in the secondary endpoint, PSA. A DP1 antagonist is not likely to be effective in rosacea. </p>","PeriodicalId":15536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"55 2","pages":"137-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.383","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea shares facial flushing features with those seen after niacin. This study was performed to test the hypothesis whether prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) receptor subtype 1 antagonist (laropiprant) will improve the symptoms of rosacea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of laropiprant 100 mg administered once daily for 4 weeks on the signs and symptoms of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Subjects received laropiprant 100 mg once-daily (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for 4 weeks. The primary pharmacodynamics endpoint was change in Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score from baseline to week 4. The patient self-assessment (PSA) was a secondary endpoint. Laropiprant was generally well tolerated in this study for the primary endpoint of change in CEA score from Baseline to Week 4, the least-squares mean of change from baseline to visit 4/week 4 was -3.7 and -3.4 for placebo and laropiprant (100 mg), respectively. The least-squares mean difference (placebo minus laropiprant) with 90% confidence interval of change in CEA score from baseline to visit 4/week 4 was estimated as -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0). For the secondary endpoint, the least-squares mean difference (placebo minus laropiprant) with 90% confidence interval of change from baseline to visit 4/week 4 was estimated as -0.7 (-7.7, 6.4) for PSA total score, -4.5 (-14.2, 5.3) for PSA emotion score, -1.3 (-7.8, 5.3) for PSA symptoms score, and 3.6 (-4.3, 11.4) for PSA functioning score. Laropiprant administered once daily for 4 weeks was generally well tolerated in this population of subjects with rosacea. However, there were no clinically meaningful changes in the primary endpoint of CEA given that the response to laropiprant could not be differentiated from that to placebo. There was also no clinically meaningful change in the secondary endpoint, PSA. A DP1 antagonist is not likely to be effective in rosacea.

前列腺素D2受体亚型1在酒渣鼻中的非强制性作用:与安慰剂相比,laropiprant并没有减轻红斑性血管扩张型酒渣鼻的症状。
红斑毛细血管扩张型酒痤疮与烟酸后所见的面部潮红特征相同。本研究旨在验证前列腺素D2 (PGD2)受体亚型1拮抗剂(laropiprant)是否会改善酒渣鼻的症状。本研究的目的是评估laropiprant 100 mg每日一次,连续4周对红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻的症状和体征的影响。受试者服用laropiprant 100mg,每日一次(n = 30)或安慰剂(n = 30),持续4周。主要的药效学终点是临床医生红斑评估(CEA)评分从基线到第4周的变化。患者自我评估(PSA)是次要终点。在本研究中,Laropiprant从基线到第4周的CEA评分变化的主要终点总体耐受良好,安慰剂和Laropiprant (100 mg)从基线到第4次就诊的最小二乘平均变化分别为-3.7和-3.4。CEA评分从基线到第4次就诊/第4周变化的最小二乘平均差(安慰剂减去laropiprant)的90%置信区间估计为-0.3(-1.6,1.0)。对于次要终点,从基线到第4次就诊/第4周的变化具有90%置信区间的最小二乘平均差值(安慰剂减去laropiprant)估计为PSA总分-0.7 (-7.7,6.4),PSA情绪评分-4.5 (-14.2,5.3),PSA症状评分-1.3 (-7.8,5.3),PSA功能评分3.6(-4.3,11.4)。在这群酒渣鼻患者中,Laropiprant每天一次,连续4周耐受性良好。然而,考虑到laropiprant的反应无法与安慰剂区分,CEA的主要终点没有临床意义的变化。次要终点PSA也没有临床意义的变化。DP1拮抗剂不太可能对酒渣鼻有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
176
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信