Characteristics and survival to discharge of patients with STEMI between a PPCI-capable hospital and a non-PPCI hospital: a prospective observational study.

Acute cardiac care Pub Date : 2014-12-01 Epub Date: 2014-08-18 DOI:10.3109/17482941.2014.944539
Irene Kritikou, Athanasios Chalkias, Anastasios Koutsovasilis, Theodoros Xanthos
{"title":"Characteristics and survival to discharge of patients with STEMI between a PPCI-capable hospital and a non-PPCI hospital: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Irene Kritikou,&nbsp;Athanasios Chalkias,&nbsp;Anastasios Koutsovasilis,&nbsp;Theodoros Xanthos","doi":"10.3109/17482941.2014.944539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is a key therapeutic method in the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We studied the characteristics and survival to discharge in STEMI patients who presented in a PPCI-capable hospital and a non-PPCI hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 240 consecutive patients. One basic questionnaire was distributed along with an explanatory letter to the participants, who were followed until discharge from the hospital or death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 240 patients, 234 (97.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Only 6 (5%) patients who were initially presented to a non-PPCI hospital died after inter-facility transfer. Also, 36 (92.3%) of the 39 patients with an intervening time of over 90 min were admitted initially in a non-PPCI hospital. Although there was a statistically significant correlation between the type of the hospital and the delay from the onset of symptoms to PPCI (P=0.001), such correlation was not found between the delay PPCI and the outcome of the patients (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with STEMI may be transferred to a non-PPCI hospital due to the lack of prehospital triage. However, prompt inter-facility transfer results in good outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":87385,"journal":{"name":"Acute cardiac care","volume":"16 4","pages":"118-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2014.944539","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute cardiac care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2014.944539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is a key therapeutic method in the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We studied the characteristics and survival to discharge in STEMI patients who presented in a PPCI-capable hospital and a non-PPCI hospital.

Patients and methods: This prospective observational study included 240 consecutive patients. One basic questionnaire was distributed along with an explanatory letter to the participants, who were followed until discharge from the hospital or death.

Results: Of the 240 patients, 234 (97.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Only 6 (5%) patients who were initially presented to a non-PPCI hospital died after inter-facility transfer. Also, 36 (92.3%) of the 39 patients with an intervening time of over 90 min were admitted initially in a non-PPCI hospital. Although there was a statistically significant correlation between the type of the hospital and the delay from the onset of symptoms to PPCI (P=0.001), such correlation was not found between the delay PPCI and the outcome of the patients (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with STEMI may be transferred to a non-PPCI hospital due to the lack of prehospital triage. However, prompt inter-facility transfer results in good outcome.

有ppci能力的医院和非ppci医院STEMI患者的特征和出院生存率:一项前瞻性观察研究
初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)是治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的关键治疗方法。我们研究了在有ppci能力的医院和非ppci医院就诊的STEMI患者的特征和出院生存率。患者和方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究包括240例连续患者。向参与者分发了一份基本问卷和一封解释性信,一直跟踪到他们出院或死亡。结果:240例患者中,234例(97.5%)存活至出院。最初被送到非ppci医院的患者只有6例(5%)在医院间转院后死亡。此外,39例干预时间超过90分钟的患者中有36例(92.3%)最初入住非ppci医院。虽然医院类型与出现症状延迟至PPCI有统计学意义(P=0.001),但延迟PPCI与患者预后无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:由于缺乏院前分诊,STEMI患者可能会转移到非ppci医院。然而,及时的设施间转移会产生良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信