Enhancing Patient Flexibility of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin G Dosing: Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Various Maintenance and Loading Regimens in the Treatment of Primary Immunodeficiency.

Biologics in therapy Pub Date : 2014-12-01 Epub Date: 2014-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s13554-014-0018-0
Jagdev Sidhu, Mikhail Rojavin, Marc Pfister, Jonathan Edelman
{"title":"Enhancing Patient Flexibility of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin G Dosing: Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Various Maintenance and Loading Regimens in the Treatment of Primary Immunodeficiency.","authors":"Jagdev Sidhu,&nbsp;Mikhail Rojavin,&nbsp;Marc Pfister,&nbsp;Jonathan Edelman","doi":"10.1007/s13554-014-0018-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) is monthly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or weekly/biweekly subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) infusion. We used population pharmacokinetic modeling to predict immunoglobulin G (IgG) exposure following a broad range of SCIG dosing regimens for initiation and maintenance therapy in patients with PID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Simulations of SCIG dosing were performed to predict IgG concentration-time profiles and exposure metrics [steady-state area under the IgG concentration-time curve (AUC), IgG peak concentration (C max), and IgG trough concentration (C min) ratios] for various infusion regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The equivalent of a weekly SCIG maintenance dose administered one, two, three, five, or seven times per week, or biweekly produced overlapping steady-state concentration-time profiles and similar AUC, C max, and C min values [95% confidence interval (CI) for ratios was 0.98-1.03, 0.95-1.09, and 0.92-1.08, respectively]. Administration every 3 or 4 weeks resulted in higher peaks and lower troughs; the 95% CI of the AUC, C max, and C min ratios was 0.97-1.04, 1.07-1.26, and 0.86-0.95, respectively. IgG levels >7 g/L were reached within 1 week using a loading dose regimen in which the weekly maintenance dose was administered five times in the first week of treatment. In patients with very low endogenous IgG levels, administering 1.5 times the weekly maintenance dose five times in the first week of treatment resulted in a similar response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The same total weekly SCIG dose can be administered at different intervals, from daily to biweekly, with minimal impact on serum IgG levels. Several SCIG loading regimens rapidly achieve adequate serum IgG levels in treatment-naïve patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":89899,"journal":{"name":"Biologics in therapy","volume":"4 1-2","pages":"41-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13554-014-0018-0","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologics in therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13554-014-0018-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Introduction: Standard treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) is monthly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or weekly/biweekly subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) infusion. We used population pharmacokinetic modeling to predict immunoglobulin G (IgG) exposure following a broad range of SCIG dosing regimens for initiation and maintenance therapy in patients with PID.

Methods: Simulations of SCIG dosing were performed to predict IgG concentration-time profiles and exposure metrics [steady-state area under the IgG concentration-time curve (AUC), IgG peak concentration (C max), and IgG trough concentration (C min) ratios] for various infusion regimens.

Results: The equivalent of a weekly SCIG maintenance dose administered one, two, three, five, or seven times per week, or biweekly produced overlapping steady-state concentration-time profiles and similar AUC, C max, and C min values [95% confidence interval (CI) for ratios was 0.98-1.03, 0.95-1.09, and 0.92-1.08, respectively]. Administration every 3 or 4 weeks resulted in higher peaks and lower troughs; the 95% CI of the AUC, C max, and C min ratios was 0.97-1.04, 1.07-1.26, and 0.86-0.95, respectively. IgG levels >7 g/L were reached within 1 week using a loading dose regimen in which the weekly maintenance dose was administered five times in the first week of treatment. In patients with very low endogenous IgG levels, administering 1.5 times the weekly maintenance dose five times in the first week of treatment resulted in a similar response.

Conclusions: The same total weekly SCIG dose can be administered at different intervals, from daily to biweekly, with minimal impact on serum IgG levels. Several SCIG loading regimens rapidly achieve adequate serum IgG levels in treatment-naïve patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

增强患者皮下免疫球蛋白G剂量的灵活性:治疗原发性免疫缺陷的各种维持和负荷方案的药代动力学结果。
简介:原发性免疫缺陷(PID)患者的标准治疗是每月静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),或每周/双周皮下注射免疫球蛋白(SCIG)。我们使用群体药代动力学模型来预测PID患者在开始和维持治疗的大范围SCIG给药方案后的免疫球蛋白G (IgG)暴露。方法:模拟SCIG给药,预测不同输注方案的IgG浓度-时间曲线和暴露指标[IgG浓度-时间曲线下的稳态面积(AUC)、IgG峰值浓度(cmax)和IgG谷浓度(cmin)比]。结果:相当于每周服用1次、2次、3次、5次或7次SCIG维持剂量,或每两周服用一次,产生重叠的稳态浓度-时间曲线和相似的AUC、C max和C min值[比值的95%置信区间(CI)分别为0.98-1.03、0.95-1.09和0.92-1.08]。每3周或4周给药一次,峰值较高,低谷较低;AUC、cmax和cmin比值的95% CI分别为0.97 ~ 1.04、1.07 ~ 1.26和0.86 ~ 0.95。采用负荷给药方案,在治疗第一周给予5次每周维持剂量,1周内达到IgG水平>7 g/L。在内源性IgG水平非常低的患者中,在治疗的第一周给予1.5倍的每周维持剂量5次,结果类似。结论:相同的每周总剂量可以在不同的时间间隔(从每天到两周一次)给药,对血清IgG水平的影响最小。几种SCIG加载方案在treatment-naïve患者中迅速达到足够的血清IgG水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信