How Medicare Part D, Medicaid, electronic prescribing, and ICD-10 could improve public health (but only if CMS lets them).

Jennifer L Herbst
{"title":"How Medicare Part D, Medicaid, electronic prescribing, and ICD-10 could improve public health (but only if CMS lets them).","authors":"Jennifer L Herbst","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A simple change to the Medicare and Medicaid outpatient prescription drug billing systems could improve patient safety and the systems' long-term fiscal stability. Including diagnosis codes on prescription drug claims (codes already in use for other billing purposes) would transform the Medicare Part D and Medicaid prescription drug claims databases into powerful public health research tools--ones that could provide much-needed (and, to date, elusive) information on how prescription drugs work in vulnerable patient populations underrepresented in clinical research. Achieving the full potential of this proposal, though, depends upon the federal agency responsible for Medicare and Medicaid, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), maintaining its current reimbursement policy, which is perhaps best characterized as one of benign neglect of the statutory standard for coverage. If, instead of continuing coverage for the vast majority of prescription drugs, CMS decided to deny payment for the millions of prescriptions falling short of the statutory standard (and thus avoid spending billions of federal health care dollars), prescribers would find themselves in an ethical dilemma between truth-telling and effectively treating their patients. Due to the systemic incentives for prescribers and pharmacists to miscode diagnoses in order to get CMS to pay for the prescription drugs needed by patients, the decision to treat patients effectively in the short-term under a strict coverage enforcement policy would undermine the potential to more effectively treat vulnerable patients, reduce prescription errors, and properly allocate federal health care dollars in the future. Even in the midst of a financial crisis, or perhaps especially because of our current financial crisis, we cannot afford to sacrifice improved patient safety and better informed long-term management of federal health care dollars for a short-term reduction in federal spending on prescription drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73212,"journal":{"name":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A simple change to the Medicare and Medicaid outpatient prescription drug billing systems could improve patient safety and the systems' long-term fiscal stability. Including diagnosis codes on prescription drug claims (codes already in use for other billing purposes) would transform the Medicare Part D and Medicaid prescription drug claims databases into powerful public health research tools--ones that could provide much-needed (and, to date, elusive) information on how prescription drugs work in vulnerable patient populations underrepresented in clinical research. Achieving the full potential of this proposal, though, depends upon the federal agency responsible for Medicare and Medicaid, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), maintaining its current reimbursement policy, which is perhaps best characterized as one of benign neglect of the statutory standard for coverage. If, instead of continuing coverage for the vast majority of prescription drugs, CMS decided to deny payment for the millions of prescriptions falling short of the statutory standard (and thus avoid spending billions of federal health care dollars), prescribers would find themselves in an ethical dilemma between truth-telling and effectively treating their patients. Due to the systemic incentives for prescribers and pharmacists to miscode diagnoses in order to get CMS to pay for the prescription drugs needed by patients, the decision to treat patients effectively in the short-term under a strict coverage enforcement policy would undermine the potential to more effectively treat vulnerable patients, reduce prescription errors, and properly allocate federal health care dollars in the future. Even in the midst of a financial crisis, or perhaps especially because of our current financial crisis, we cannot afford to sacrifice improved patient safety and better informed long-term management of federal health care dollars for a short-term reduction in federal spending on prescription drugs.

医疗保险D部分、医疗补助、电子处方和ICD-10如何改善公众健康(但前提是CMS允许)。
对医疗保险和医疗补助门诊处方药计费系统的简单改变可以改善患者安全和系统的长期财政稳定性。在处方药索赔中加入诊断代码(已经用于其他计费目的的代码)将把医疗保险D部分和医疗补助处方药索赔数据库转变为强大的公共卫生研究工具——这些工具可以提供急需的(迄今为止难以获得的)信息,了解处方药如何在临床研究中未被充分代表的弱势患者群体中发挥作用。然而,实现这一提议的全部潜力,取决于负责医疗保险和医疗补助的联邦机构,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS),维持其目前的报销政策,这可能是对法定覆盖标准的善意忽视的最好描述。如果CMS不继续覆盖绝大多数处方药,而是决定拒绝支付数百万低于法定标准的处方(从而避免花费数十亿的联邦医疗保健美元),开处方的人将发现自己在讲真话和有效治疗病人之间陷入道德困境。由于处方医生和药剂师为了让CMS支付患者所需的处方药而对诊断进行错误编码的系统性激励,在严格的保险执行政策下短期有效治疗患者的决定将破坏更有效治疗弱势患者、减少处方错误和未来合理分配联邦医疗保健资金的潜力。即使是在金融危机中,或者特别是因为我们当前的金融危机,我们也不能为了短期减少联邦处方药支出而牺牲提高患者安全和更好地长期管理联邦医疗保健资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信