Beyond IC50s: Towards Robust Statistical Methods for in vitro Association Studies.

Andrew Beam, Alison Motsinger-Reif
{"title":"Beyond IC<sub>50</sub><i>s</i>: Towards Robust Statistical Methods for <i>in vitro</i> Association Studies.","authors":"Andrew Beam,&nbsp;Alison Motsinger-Reif","doi":"10.4172/2153-0645.1000121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cell line cytotoxicity assays have become increasingly popular approaches for genetic and genomic studies of differential cytotoxic response. There are an increasing number of success stories, but relatively little evaluation of the statistical approaches used in such studies. In the vast majority of these studies, concentration response is summarized using curve-fitting approaches, and then summary measure(s) are used as the phenotype in subsequent genetic association studies. The curve is usually summarized by a single parameter such as the curve's inflection point (e.g. the EC/IC<sub>50</sub>). Such modeling makes major assumptions and has statistical limitations that should be considered. In the current review, we discuss the limitations of the EC/IC<sub>50</sub> as a phenotype in association studies, and highlight some potential limitations with a simulation experiment. Finally, we discuss some alternative analysis approaches that have been shown to be more robust.</p>","PeriodicalId":89693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacogenomics & pharmacoproteomics","volume":"5 1","pages":"1000121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2153-0645.1000121","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacogenomics & pharmacoproteomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-0645.1000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Cell line cytotoxicity assays have become increasingly popular approaches for genetic and genomic studies of differential cytotoxic response. There are an increasing number of success stories, but relatively little evaluation of the statistical approaches used in such studies. In the vast majority of these studies, concentration response is summarized using curve-fitting approaches, and then summary measure(s) are used as the phenotype in subsequent genetic association studies. The curve is usually summarized by a single parameter such as the curve's inflection point (e.g. the EC/IC50). Such modeling makes major assumptions and has statistical limitations that should be considered. In the current review, we discuss the limitations of the EC/IC50 as a phenotype in association studies, and highlight some potential limitations with a simulation experiment. Finally, we discuss some alternative analysis approaches that have been shown to be more robust.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超过ic50:对体外关联研究的稳健统计方法。
细胞系细胞毒性测定已成为越来越流行的方法,遗传和基因组研究的差异细胞毒性反应。有越来越多的成功案例,但对这些研究中使用的统计方法的评价相对较少。在这些研究中,绝大多数使用曲线拟合方法总结浓度反应,然后在随后的遗传关联研究中使用总结测量作为表型。曲线通常用单个参数来概括,例如曲线的拐点(例如EC/IC50)。这样的建模做出了主要的假设,并有统计上的限制,应该加以考虑。在当前的综述中,我们讨论了EC/IC50作为一种表型在关联研究中的局限性,并通过模拟实验强调了一些潜在的局限性。最后,我们讨论了一些已被证明更为健壮的替代分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书