Measurement Performance of the Sense of Community Index in Substance Abuse Recovery Communal Housing.

0 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Australian Community Psychologist Pub Date : 2011-08-01
Edward B Stevens, Leonard A Jason, Joseph R Ferrari
{"title":"Measurement Performance of the Sense of Community Index in Substance Abuse Recovery Communal Housing.","authors":"Edward B Stevens,&nbsp;Leonard A Jason,&nbsp;Joseph R Ferrari","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A critical concept in the community psychology has been the sense of community. One of the better known instruments developed and evaluated to measure this construct is the Sense of Community Index (<i>SCI</i>: Perkins, Florin, Rich, Wandersman, & Chavis, 1990). The present research examined the unidimensional <i>SCI</i>'s measurement properties with an adult population (<i>n</i> = 662; <i>M</i> age = 38.4) recovering from substance abuse and residing in Oxford House recovery residences. Overall, the <i>SCI</i> exhibited sufficient reliability as a unidimensional instrument, but lacked reliability as a theoretical four factor model. It did, however, demonstrate an invariant 3 factor latent structure relating to <i>rationale for connection</i> (7 items), <i>social bonds</i> (3 items), and <i>personal importance</i> (2 items). Race was found to be associated with <i>personal importance</i>. In addition, <i>personal importance</i> was predictive of the likelihood of remaining a resident in Oxford House. The implications of these findings for the field of resilience are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43620,"journal":{"name":"Australian Community Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114391/pdf/nihms443410.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Community Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A critical concept in the community psychology has been the sense of community. One of the better known instruments developed and evaluated to measure this construct is the Sense of Community Index (SCI: Perkins, Florin, Rich, Wandersman, & Chavis, 1990). The present research examined the unidimensional SCI's measurement properties with an adult population (n = 662; M age = 38.4) recovering from substance abuse and residing in Oxford House recovery residences. Overall, the SCI exhibited sufficient reliability as a unidimensional instrument, but lacked reliability as a theoretical four factor model. It did, however, demonstrate an invariant 3 factor latent structure relating to rationale for connection (7 items), social bonds (3 items), and personal importance (2 items). Race was found to be associated with personal importance. In addition, personal importance was predictive of the likelihood of remaining a resident in Oxford House. The implications of these findings for the field of resilience are discussed.

社区意识指数在药物滥用康复社区住房中的测量表现。
社区心理学中的一个重要概念是社区意识。开发和评估的比较知名的工具之一是社区意识指数(SCI: Perkins, Florin, Rich, Wandersman, & Chavis, 1990)。本研究对成人群体(n = 662;M年龄= 38.4)正在药物滥用中康复,住在牛津之家康复公寓。总体而言,SCI作为一种单向度的工具具有足够的信度,但作为理论四因素模型的信度不足。然而,它确实展示了一个不变的潜在因素结构,涉及联系的基本原理(7个项目),社会纽带(3个项目)和个人重要性(2个项目)。研究发现,种族与个人重要性有关。此外,个人重要性可以预测留在牛津宿舍的可能性。讨论了这些发现对弹性领域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Community Psychologist
Australian Community Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信