Comparison of IGRA tests and TST in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection and predicting tuberculosis in risk groups in Krakow, Poland.

Katarzyna Kruczak, Mariusz Duplaga, Marek Sanak, Adam Cmiel, Lucyna Mastalerz, Krzysztof Sladek, Ewa Nizankowska-Mogilnicka
{"title":"Comparison of IGRA tests and TST in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection and predicting tuberculosis in risk groups in Krakow, Poland.","authors":"Katarzyna Kruczak,&nbsp;Mariusz Duplaga,&nbsp;Marek Sanak,&nbsp;Adam Cmiel,&nbsp;Lucyna Mastalerz,&nbsp;Krzysztof Sladek,&nbsp;Ewa Nizankowska-Mogilnicka","doi":"10.3109/00365548.2014.927955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in risk groups in Krakow, using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test and the tuberculin skin test (TST); we also sought to assess the rate of progression to active disease over 4-5 y of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>QFT-GIT tests were performed on 785 subjects and the TST on 701 subjects from the risk groups of homeless persons, close contacts, periodic contacts, and residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs), and subjects from a low risk group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In homeless persons, close contacts, periodic contacts, LTCF residents, and low risk persons, a positive QFT-GIT was found in 36.7%, 27.2%, 27.0%, 21.1%, and 23.7% of subjects, respectively, while a positive TST was found in 55.8%, 47.4%, 47.6%, 43.2%, and 47.9%, respectively. Of 63 homeless subjects, 5 developed active TB over 248 person-y of follow-up (incidence rate (IR) 20 per 1000 person-y, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-48.5); of 148 close contacts, 5 developed active TB over 740 person-y of follow-up (IR 7, 95% CI 2.8-16.2); of 145 periodic contacts, 2 developed active TB over 580 person-y of follow-up (IR 4, 95% CI 0.9-13.8). The IR per 1000 person-y (95% CI) among subjects with a positive QFT-GIT was 30 (9.0-86.1) for homeless subjects, 18 (5.7-54.7) for close contacts, and 13 (3.2-51.3) for periodic contacts. In Poland there is no policy for the provision of LTBI treatment to people with a positive QFT or TST; therefore, the estimated rates of disease progression were analysed amongst untreated subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of positive QFT-GIT and TST was high in the study risk groups. The best predictor of active TB in the homeless and close contacts groups was a positive QFT-GIT together with a positive TST.</p>","PeriodicalId":21541,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.927955","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.927955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in risk groups in Krakow, using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test and the tuberculin skin test (TST); we also sought to assess the rate of progression to active disease over 4-5 y of follow-up.

Methods: QFT-GIT tests were performed on 785 subjects and the TST on 701 subjects from the risk groups of homeless persons, close contacts, periodic contacts, and residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs), and subjects from a low risk group.

Results: In homeless persons, close contacts, periodic contacts, LTCF residents, and low risk persons, a positive QFT-GIT was found in 36.7%, 27.2%, 27.0%, 21.1%, and 23.7% of subjects, respectively, while a positive TST was found in 55.8%, 47.4%, 47.6%, 43.2%, and 47.9%, respectively. Of 63 homeless subjects, 5 developed active TB over 248 person-y of follow-up (incidence rate (IR) 20 per 1000 person-y, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-48.5); of 148 close contacts, 5 developed active TB over 740 person-y of follow-up (IR 7, 95% CI 2.8-16.2); of 145 periodic contacts, 2 developed active TB over 580 person-y of follow-up (IR 4, 95% CI 0.9-13.8). The IR per 1000 person-y (95% CI) among subjects with a positive QFT-GIT was 30 (9.0-86.1) for homeless subjects, 18 (5.7-54.7) for close contacts, and 13 (3.2-51.3) for periodic contacts. In Poland there is no policy for the provision of LTBI treatment to people with a positive QFT or TST; therefore, the estimated rates of disease progression were analysed amongst untreated subjects.

Conclusions: The prevalence of positive QFT-GIT and TST was high in the study risk groups. The best predictor of active TB in the homeless and close contacts groups was a positive QFT-GIT together with a positive TST.

IGRA试验和TST在波兰克拉科夫危险人群中诊断潜伏性结核感染和预测结核的比较
背景:本研究的目的是利用QuantiFERON-TB金管(QFT-GIT)试验和结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)评估克拉科夫危险人群中潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的患病率;我们还试图评估4-5年随访期间进展为活动性疾病的比率。方法:对来自无家可归者、密切接触者、定期接触者、长期护理机构(ltcf)居民和低风险组的785名受试者进行QFT-GIT测试,701名受试者进行TST测试。结果:在无家可归者、密切接触者、周期性接触者、长期接触者和低危人群中,QFT-GIT阳性率分别为36.7%、27.2%、27.0%、21.1%和23.7%,TST阳性率分别为55.8%、47.4%、47.6%、43.2%和47.9%。在63名无家可归者中,5名在248人/年的随访中发展为活动性结核病(发病率(IR) 20 / 1000人/年,95%置信区间(CI) 8.4-48.5);148名密切接触者中,5人在740人/年的随访中出现活动性结核病(IR 7, 95% CI 2.8-16.2);在145名定期接触者中,2名在580人/年的随访中发展为活动性结核病(IR 4, 95% CI 0.9-13.8)。在QFT-GIT阳性受试者中,每1000人的IR (95% CI)为无家可归者30(9.0-86.1),密切接触者18(5.7-54.7),周期性接触者13(3.2-51.3)。在波兰,没有政策规定为QFT或TST呈阳性的人提供LTBI治疗;因此,对未经治疗的受试者的疾病进展率进行了分析。结论:在研究风险组中,QFT-GIT和TST阳性的发生率较高。在无家可归者和密切接触者群体中,活动性结核病的最佳预测指标是QFT-GIT阳性和TST阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信