PHTLS ® (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) provider courses in Germany - who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training?

Journal of trauma management & outcomes Pub Date : 2014-07-07 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1186/1752-2897-8-7
Christian B Frank, Christoph G Wölfl, Aidan Hogan, Arnold J Suda, Thorsten Gühring, Bernhard Gliwitzky, Matthias Münzberg
{"title":"PHTLS ® (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) provider courses in Germany - who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training?","authors":"Christian B Frank,&nbsp;Christoph G Wölfl,&nbsp;Aidan Hogan,&nbsp;Arnold J Suda,&nbsp;Thorsten Gühring,&nbsp;Bernhard Gliwitzky,&nbsp;Matthias Münzberg","doi":"10.1186/1752-2897-8-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study was to examine PHTLS Provider courses in Germany and to proof the assumption that formation of physicians and paramedics in prehospital trauma care can be optimized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PHTLS participants were asked to fill out standardized questionnaires during their course preparation and directly after the course. There were some open questions regarding their professional background and closed questions concerning PHTLS itself. Further questions were to be answered on an analog scale in order to quantify subjective impressions of confidence, knowledge and also to describe individual levels of education and training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>247 questionnaires could be analyzed. Physicians noted significant (p < 0.001) more deficits in their professional training than paramedics. 80% of the paramedics affirmed to have had adequate training with respect to prehospital trauma care, all physicians claimed not to have had sufficient training for prehospital trauma care situations at Medical School. Physicians were statistically most significant dissatisfied then paramedics (p < 0.001). While most participants gave positive feedback, anesthetists were less convinced of PHTLS (p = 0.005), didn't benefit as much as the rest (p = 0.004) and stated more often, that the course was of less value for their daily work (p = 0.03). After the course confidence increased remarkably and reached higher rates than before the course (p < 0.001). After PHTLS both groups showed similar ratings concerning the course concept indicating that PHTLS could equalize some training deficits and help to gain confidence and assurance in prehospital trauma situations. 90% of the paramedics and 100% of the physicians would recommend PHTLS. Physicians and especially anesthetists revised their opinions with regard to providing PHTLS at Medical School after having taken part in a PHTLS course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of PHTLS courses in Germany indicates the necessity for special prehospital trauma care training. Paramedics and physicians criticize deficits in their professional training, which can be compensated by PHTLS. With respect to relevant items like confidence and knowledge PHTLS leads to a statistically significant increase in ratings on a visual analogue scale. PHTLS should be integrated into the curriculum at Medical School.</p>","PeriodicalId":87652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","volume":"8 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1752-2897-8-7","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-8-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: The goal of this study was to examine PHTLS Provider courses in Germany and to proof the assumption that formation of physicians and paramedics in prehospital trauma care can be optimized.

Methods: PHTLS participants were asked to fill out standardized questionnaires during their course preparation and directly after the course. There were some open questions regarding their professional background and closed questions concerning PHTLS itself. Further questions were to be answered on an analog scale in order to quantify subjective impressions of confidence, knowledge and also to describe individual levels of education and training.

Results: 247 questionnaires could be analyzed. Physicians noted significant (p < 0.001) more deficits in their professional training than paramedics. 80% of the paramedics affirmed to have had adequate training with respect to prehospital trauma care, all physicians claimed not to have had sufficient training for prehospital trauma care situations at Medical School. Physicians were statistically most significant dissatisfied then paramedics (p < 0.001). While most participants gave positive feedback, anesthetists were less convinced of PHTLS (p = 0.005), didn't benefit as much as the rest (p = 0.004) and stated more often, that the course was of less value for their daily work (p = 0.03). After the course confidence increased remarkably and reached higher rates than before the course (p < 0.001). After PHTLS both groups showed similar ratings concerning the course concept indicating that PHTLS could equalize some training deficits and help to gain confidence and assurance in prehospital trauma situations. 90% of the paramedics and 100% of the physicians would recommend PHTLS. Physicians and especially anesthetists revised their opinions with regard to providing PHTLS at Medical School after having taken part in a PHTLS course.

Conclusion: The evaluation of PHTLS courses in Germany indicates the necessity for special prehospital trauma care training. Paramedics and physicians criticize deficits in their professional training, which can be compensated by PHTLS. With respect to relevant items like confidence and knowledge PHTLS leads to a statistically significant increase in ratings on a visual analogue scale. PHTLS should be integrated into the curriculum at Medical School.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

德国PHTLS®(院前创伤生命支持)提供者课程-谁参加了培训,参与者对院前创伤护理培训有何看法?
背景:本研究的目的是考察德国PHTLS提供者课程,并证明院前创伤护理中医生和护理人员的形成可以优化的假设。方法:要求PHTLS参与者在课程准备期间和课程结束后填写标准化问卷。有一些关于他们的专业背景的开放式问题,以及关于PHTLS本身的封闭式问题。进一步的问题将在模拟尺度上回答,以便量化对信心、知识的主观印象,并描述个人的教育和培训水平。结果:共分析问卷247份。内科医生在专业培训方面的缺陷明显多于护理人员(p < 0.001)。80%的护理人员肯定接受过院前创伤护理方面的充分培训,所有医生都声称没有在医学院接受过院前创伤护理方面的充分培训。内科医生的不满意度高于护理人员(p < 0.001)。虽然大多数参与者给出了积极的反馈,但麻醉师对PHTLS的信任度较低(p = 0.005),并没有像其他人那样受益(p = 0.004),并且更频繁地表示,该课程对他们的日常工作价值较小(p = 0.03)。课程结束后,信心显著增加,达到了比课程前更高的比率(p < 0.001)。在PHTLS后,两组对课程概念的评分相似,表明PHTLS可以平衡一些训练缺陷,并有助于在院前创伤情况下获得信心和保证。90%的护理人员和100%的医生会推荐PHTLS。医生,尤其是麻醉师在参加了PHTLS课程后,会改变他们对在医学院提供PHTLS的看法。结论:通过对德国PHTLS课程的评价,提示有必要开展院前创伤护理专业培训。护理人员和医生批评他们在专业培训中的缺陷,这可以通过PHTLS来弥补。就信心和知识等相关项目而言,PHTLS在视觉模拟量表上的评分在统计上显着增加。PHTLS应纳入医学院的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书