Re-examining Sonographic Cut-off Values for Diagnosing Early Pregnancy Loss.

Jennifer Bickhaus, Erin Perry, Danny J Schust
{"title":"Re-examining Sonographic Cut-off Values for Diagnosing Early Pregnancy Loss.","authors":"Jennifer Bickhaus, Erin Perry, Danny J Schust","doi":"10.4172/2161-0932.1000141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early pregnancy loss is the most common complication of human pregnancy [1]. Such commonality requires dependable evaluation tools and informed, standardized criteria for accurate diagnosis. A brief perusal of the data on which most of the practitioners who treat women who are newly pregnant have based their recommendations for the sonographic diagnosis of a non-viable pregnancy raises significant concern since most of these data are based on relatively small patient numbers [2–5]. Further, recent studies have shown that the measurements used to determine historically-accepted criteria have fairly wide patient-to-patient, hyphenate intra-observer and interobserver variability [6]. This makes the inclusion of investigations based upon small patient numbers even more problematic. This unfortunate combination poses an important problem because the diagnosis of failed pregnancy has immense implications to the physical health of the mother and to the emotional well-being of the mother, her partner, her family and her close friends. The criteria for diagnosing a non-viable pregnancy must have a specificity that is as close to 100% as possible. Still, using commonly accepted historical sonographic criteria, authors have shown that between 1 in 100 and 4 in 100 viable pregnancies might be erroneously deemed non-viable [7,8]. If these incorrect diagnoses lead to immediate interventions, some pregnancies will be inadvertently terminated. Such outcomes are unacceptable. There should be near zero tolerance for misdiagnosis. Increased awareness of this too common problem has led to efforts to improve our diagnostic accuracy and has required a stringent re-evaluation of historical diagnostic criteria using investigations that include much larger study populations that have been evaluated using the most sensitive, commonly-available diagnostic modalities. In this case, the most sensitive ultrasonographic technique available for diagnosing an early, non-viable pregnancy is transvaginal sonography.","PeriodicalId":89928,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology & obstetrics (Sunnyvale, Calif.)","volume":"3 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102315/pdf/nihms455472.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology & obstetrics (Sunnyvale, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Early pregnancy loss is the most common complication of human pregnancy [1]. Such commonality requires dependable evaluation tools and informed, standardized criteria for accurate diagnosis. A brief perusal of the data on which most of the practitioners who treat women who are newly pregnant have based their recommendations for the sonographic diagnosis of a non-viable pregnancy raises significant concern since most of these data are based on relatively small patient numbers [2–5]. Further, recent studies have shown that the measurements used to determine historically-accepted criteria have fairly wide patient-to-patient, hyphenate intra-observer and interobserver variability [6]. This makes the inclusion of investigations based upon small patient numbers even more problematic. This unfortunate combination poses an important problem because the diagnosis of failed pregnancy has immense implications to the physical health of the mother and to the emotional well-being of the mother, her partner, her family and her close friends. The criteria for diagnosing a non-viable pregnancy must have a specificity that is as close to 100% as possible. Still, using commonly accepted historical sonographic criteria, authors have shown that between 1 in 100 and 4 in 100 viable pregnancies might be erroneously deemed non-viable [7,8]. If these incorrect diagnoses lead to immediate interventions, some pregnancies will be inadvertently terminated. Such outcomes are unacceptable. There should be near zero tolerance for misdiagnosis. Increased awareness of this too common problem has led to efforts to improve our diagnostic accuracy and has required a stringent re-evaluation of historical diagnostic criteria using investigations that include much larger study populations that have been evaluated using the most sensitive, commonly-available diagnostic modalities. In this case, the most sensitive ultrasonographic technique available for diagnosing an early, non-viable pregnancy is transvaginal sonography.
超声切断值诊断早期妊娠丢失的再研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信