Pilots' visual scan patterns and situation awareness in flight operations.

Chung-San Yu, Eric Min-Yang Wang, Wen-Chin Li, Graham Braithwaite
{"title":"Pilots' visual scan patterns and situation awareness in flight operations.","authors":"Chung-San Yu,&nbsp;Eric Min-Yang Wang,&nbsp;Wen-Chin Li,&nbsp;Graham Braithwaite","doi":"10.3357/asem.3847.2014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Situation awareness (SA) is considered an essential prerequisite for safe flying. If the impact of visual scanning patterns on a pilot's situation awareness could be identified in flight operations, then eye-tracking tools could be integrated with flight simulators to improve training efficiency.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participating in this research were 18 qualified, mission-ready fighter pilots. The equipment included high-fidelity and fixed-base type flight simulators and mobile head-mounted eye-tracking devices to record a subject's eye movements and SA while performing air-to-surface tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in pilots' percentage of fixation in three operating phases: preparation (M = 46.09, SD = 14.79), aiming (M = 24.24, SD = 11.03), and release and break-away (M = 33.98, SD = 14.46). Also, there were significant differences in pilots' pupil sizes, which were largest in the aiming phase (M = 27,621, SD = 6390.8), followed by release and break-away (M = 27,173, SD = 5830.46), then preparation (M = 25,710, SD = 6078.79), which was the smallest. Furthermore, pilots with better SA performance showed lower perceived workload (M = 30.60, SD = 17.86), and pilots with poor SA performance showed higher perceived workload (M = 60.77, SD = 12.72). Pilots' percentage of fixation and average fixation duration among five different areas of interest showed significant differences as well.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Eye-tracking devices can aid in capturing pilots' visual scan patterns and SA performance, unlike traditional flight simulators. Therefore, integrating eye-tracking devices into the simulator may be a useful method for promoting SA training in flight operations, and can provide in-depth understanding of the mechanism of visual scan patterns and information processing to improve training effectiveness in aviation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":"85 7","pages":"708-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/asem.3847.2014","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.3847.2014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Introduction: Situation awareness (SA) is considered an essential prerequisite for safe flying. If the impact of visual scanning patterns on a pilot's situation awareness could be identified in flight operations, then eye-tracking tools could be integrated with flight simulators to improve training efficiency.

Method: Participating in this research were 18 qualified, mission-ready fighter pilots. The equipment included high-fidelity and fixed-base type flight simulators and mobile head-mounted eye-tracking devices to record a subject's eye movements and SA while performing air-to-surface tasks.

Results: There were significant differences in pilots' percentage of fixation in three operating phases: preparation (M = 46.09, SD = 14.79), aiming (M = 24.24, SD = 11.03), and release and break-away (M = 33.98, SD = 14.46). Also, there were significant differences in pilots' pupil sizes, which were largest in the aiming phase (M = 27,621, SD = 6390.8), followed by release and break-away (M = 27,173, SD = 5830.46), then preparation (M = 25,710, SD = 6078.79), which was the smallest. Furthermore, pilots with better SA performance showed lower perceived workload (M = 30.60, SD = 17.86), and pilots with poor SA performance showed higher perceived workload (M = 60.77, SD = 12.72). Pilots' percentage of fixation and average fixation duration among five different areas of interest showed significant differences as well.

Discussion: Eye-tracking devices can aid in capturing pilots' visual scan patterns and SA performance, unlike traditional flight simulators. Therefore, integrating eye-tracking devices into the simulator may be a useful method for promoting SA training in flight operations, and can provide in-depth understanding of the mechanism of visual scan patterns and information processing to improve training effectiveness in aviation.

飞行操作中飞行员的视觉扫描模式与态势感知。
态势感知(SA)被认为是安全飞行必不可少的先决条件。如果可以在飞行操作中识别视觉扫描模式对飞行员态势感知的影响,那么眼动追踪工具可以与飞行模拟器集成,以提高训练效率。方法:参加本研究的是18名合格的任务准备战斗机飞行员。设备包括高保真和固定基座型飞行模拟器和移动头戴式眼球追踪设备,用于记录受试者在执行空对地任务时的眼球运动和SA。结果:飞行员在准备阶段(M = 46.09, SD = 14.79)、瞄准阶段(M = 24.24, SD = 11.03)、松开和挣脱阶段(M = 33.98, SD = 14.46)的固定百分率差异有统计学意义。飞行员的瞳孔大小在瞄准阶段最大(M = 27621, SD = 6390.8),其次是释放和分离阶段(M = 27173, SD = 5830.46),然后是准备阶段(M = 25710, SD = 6078.79),最小。此外,SA表现较好的飞行员感知工作负荷较低(M = 30.60, SD = 17.86), SA表现较差的飞行员感知工作负荷较高(M = 60.77, SD = 12.72)。飞行员在五个不同兴趣区域的注视百分比和平均注视时间也存在显著差异。讨论:与传统的飞行模拟器不同,眼球追踪设备可以帮助捕捉飞行员的视觉扫描模式和SA表现。因此,将眼动追踪设备集成到模拟器中可能是促进飞行操作中SA训练的有效方法,可以深入了解视觉扫描模式和信息处理的机制,提高航空训练的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信